Research Article

Clothing and Teacher Credibility: An Application of Expectancy Violations Theory

Table 4

Multivariate analysis of variance for attractiveness and homophily ratings.

Independent variableMultivariate effectUnivariate effects

RewardWilks’s Λ = 0.99, 𝐹 ( 3 , 2 1 9 ) = 0 . 3 8 , 𝑃 = . 7 6 6 Soc. attrac. 𝐹 ( 1 , 2 2 1 ) = 0 . 6 6 , 𝑃 = . 4 1 6
Phys. attrac. 𝐹 ( 1 , 2 2 1 ) = 1 . 0 3 , 𝑃 = . 3 1 2
Homophily 𝐹 ( 1 , 2 2 1 ) = 0 . 1 0 , 𝑃 = . 7 4 9
FormalityWilks’s Λ = 0.92, 𝐹 ( 6 , 4 3 8 ) = 3 . 3 3 , 𝑃 = . 0 0 3 Soc. attrac. F (2, 221) = 2.39, 𝑃 = . 0 9 4 , 𝜂 2 = . 0 2
Phys. attrac. F (2, 221) = 4.10, 𝑃 = . 0 1 8 , 𝜂 2 = . 0 4
Homophily F (2, 221) = 2.22, 𝑃 = . 1 1 1 , 𝜂 2 = . 0 2
Reward × formalityWilks’s Λ = 0.98, 𝐹 ( 6 , 4 3 8 ) = 0 . 8 1 , 𝑃 = . 5 6 0 Soc. attrac. 𝐹 ( 2 , 2 2 1 ) = 1 . 8 2 , 𝑃 = . 1 6 5
Phys. attrac. 𝐹 ( 2 , 2 2 1 ) = 1 . 2 6 , 𝑃 = . 2 8 5
Homophily 𝐹 ( 2 , 2 2 1 ) = 0 . 6 4 , 𝑃 = . 5 2 7