Table of Contents
ISRN Education
Volume 2012, Article ID 170790, 4 pages
Research Article

Interpersonal Rejection Sensitivity and Regulatory Focus Theory to Explain College Students' Class Engagement

1Brigham Young School of Law, Provo, UT 84602, USA
2Department of Physicians Assistant Studies, University of South Dakota, 414 E Clark Street, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA

Received 6 December 2011; Accepted 15 January 2012

Academic Editors: F. Paas and G. Velan

Copyright © 2012 David Roscheck and William E. Schweinle. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Association of American Colleges and Universities, College Learning for the New Global Century: A report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America’s Promise, Association of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
  2. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), Student Engagement: Exploring Different Dimensions of Student Engagement, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, Bloomington, Ind, USA, 2005.
  3. C. A. Hyde and B. J. Ruth, “Multicultural content and class participation: do students self-censor?” Journal of Social Work Education, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 241–256, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  4. K. Rubin and R. Coplan, The Development of Shyness and Social Withdrawal, Guilford, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
  5. K. A. Rocca, “Student participation in the college classroom: an extended multidisciplinary literature review,” Communication Education, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 185–213, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. R. Neer and W. F. Kircher, “Apprehensives' perception of classroom factors influencing their class participation,” Communications Research Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. S. Feldman and G. Downey, “Rejection sensitivity as a mediator of the impact of childhood exposure to family violence on adult attachment behavior,” Development and Psychopathology, vol. 6, pp. 231–247, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. G. Downey and S. I. Feldman, “Implications of Rejection Sensitivity for Intimate Relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1327–1343, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  9. G. Downey, A. Lebolt, and C. Rincon, Rejection Sensitivity: A Consequence of Rejection and a Cause of Interpersonal Difficulties in Adolescence, Columbia University, Columbia, SC, USA, 1995.
  10. G. Downey, S. Feldman, J. Khuri, and S. Friedman, “Maltreatment and child depression,” in Handbook of Depression in Childhood and Adolescence, W. M. Reynolds and H. F. Johnson, Eds., pp. 481–508, Plenum, New York, NY, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  11. E. T. Higgins, R. S. Friedman, R. E. Harlow, L. C. Idson, O. N. Ayduk, and A. Taylor, “Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: promotion pride versus prevention pride,” European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 3–23, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. E. Landrum, “Faculty perceptions concerning the frequency and appropriateness of student behaviors,” Teaching of Psychology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 269–272, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. L. Aiken and S. West, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif, USA, 1991.
  14. C. M. Burchfield and J. Sappington, “Participation in classroom discussion,” Teaching of Psychology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 290–291, 1999. View at Google Scholar