International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2012 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 180787 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/180787

Similar Device Architectures for Inverted Organic Solar Cell and Laminated Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Academic Editor: M. Hopkinson
Received14 Apr 2012
Accepted28 May 2012
Published14 Jul 2012

Abstract

Here, we examine the device architecture of two different types of solar cells mainly inverted organic solar cells and solid state dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) that use organic materials as hole transportation. The inverted organic solar cells structure is dominated by work on titanium dioxide ( T i O 2 ) and zinc oxide (ZnO). These layers are sensitized with dye in solid state DSSCs. Because of the similar device architecture, it becomes possible to fabricate laminated solid-state DSSCs. The performance of the device was improved by varying the top metal electrode. In laminated solid-state DSSC, we expect that excited dye molecules inject electron into the conduction band of nanocrystalline T i O 2 layer, whereas P3HT provides efficient hole transportation. These solar cells are promising for future energy source as they are cheaper, light weight, flexible and made into large areas, which are showing growing importance.

1. Introduction

Organic photovoltaic (OPV) provides promise of a low-cost solar photovoltaic solution and attracts significant academic and industry research. Organic semiconducting materials having delocalized pi (π) electron system can absorb sunlight, create exciton, and transport photogenerated charge carriers. They have higher absorption coefficients; therefore active layer of a few hundreds of nanometer range is enough. Electronic band gap of the materials can be controlled by chemical synthesis. Polymer-fullerene bulk heterojunction was studied showing several breakthroughs in efficiency [13]. Every year new record on power conversion efficiency (PCE) of organic solar cell is being set. Mitsubishi Chemical reportedly set a new efficiency record, producing organic solar cells with 9.2% conversion efficiency. Meanwhile, Konarka Technologies, Solarmer Energy Inc., and Heliatek are now reporting cells with efficiencies greater than 8% [4]. These results pave towards commercialization of the techniques. It is predicted that OPVs devices achieve 10% efficiency from single layer device and around 15% in tandem structure [5]. However, the conventional device architecture which consists of a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) as hole-collecting layer and a bulk-heterojunction layer (polymer-fullerenes), sandwiched between indium-doped tin oxide (ITO) or fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO), and a low work function metal electrode is considered not efficient for higher power conversion efficiency and long stability. The low work function metal electrode can be easily oxidized in air leading to deterioration in performance. To address these problems, a new device architecture using a titanium oxide ( T i O 𝑥 ) or zinc oxide (ZnO) buffer layer between the organic active layer and ITO substrate has been introduced as a hole blocking and oxygen barrier layer for device stability. Therefore, the concept of inverted organic solar cell was introduced [69].

2. Inverted Solar Cell

The name “inverted” describes the reversed change in polarity of solar cell. For example, in ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PCBM/Al device structure, ITO and Al electrodes collect holes and electrons, respectively, as shown in Figure 1(a). But in inverted device structure, proper n or p-type interfacial layers are introduced above ITO or below metal electrode, which change the polarity of the device. Now, ITOs collect electrons and metal electrodes collect holes. In this way, the polarity of the solar cell is reversed. Schematic diagram of inverted solar cell is given in Figure 1(b). Higher work function metal electrodes like gold (Au), silver (Ag), and copper (Cu) are generally used as top metal electrodes in inverted solar cell architecture. These metal electrodes are air-stable and make good contact with organic layers. Furthermore, nonvacuum coating technique process of top electrode is also possible [1013], which is very important to reduce the device fabrication complexity and cost. High-energy band gap materials such as zinc oxide (ZnO) [14, 15], titanium oxide ( T i O 𝑥 ) [1618], cesium carbonates (Cs2CO3) [19, 20], and calcium (Ca) [21] are generally coated on ITO substrate for efficient electron transportation, whereas molybdenum trioxide (VI) MnO3 [2226], vanadium oxide (V2O5) [27, 28], tungsten oxide (WO3) [29, 30], and solution-processed conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) [3133], sulfonated poly(diphenylamine) (SPDPA) [34] are deposited or coated below the top metal electrodes. Such interfacial layers play important roles (a) to suppress contact resistance between the organic and charge collecting electrodes [1434], (b) change non-Ohmic contact to Ohmic contact [19], and (c) efficiently transport charges [1435], and so on.

Furthermore, the inverted solar cell structures are classified into two categories. Figures 1(b) and 1(c) are the two examples of inverted solar cell architecture introduced by Krebs et al. [35] and Gaynor et al. [11]. In the formal case, light is illuminated from the bottom electrode whereas it is illuminated from top in the latter case. Based on the light source illumination, the inverted architecture is differentiated into top illuminated or bottom illuminated inverted solar cells. The top illuminated architecture utilizes a reflective buried bottom electrode and a semitransparent top electrode (like Ag nanowires in Figure 1(c)) whereas the bottom illuminated inverted solar cell utilizes a higher work function reflective electrode at the top and semitransparent conducting electrode (like ITO, FTO) at the bottom (Figure 1(b)). In top illuminated inverted solar cell, it is important to note that the bottom electrode is metal foil instead of a glass substrate. Ag, ITO, Cs2CO3, Al are generally deposited in the metal foil to harvest light from reflection. The detail review on inverted polymer solar is given in [36].

3. Laminated Polymer Solar Cell

Inverted polymer solar cell architecture is an efficient way to improve the efficiency as well as stability of organic solar cells. It can be further simplified by stamping or laminating top metal electrodes for roll-to-roll fabrication [3740]. It has been suggested that direct vacuum evaporation of the metal electrodes on the active polymeric layer could damage the surface morphology of the device reducing device performance [4146]. Therefore, stacking [3740] or stamping [4751] processes are introduced to fabricate the device. Stacking or stamping as a method of device fabrication has several advantages over conventional-bottom up device fabrication process. They are (a) PCE of the stacking (or laminated) device which is almost similar or higher to the devices fabricated from the evaporated top metal electrode [3740]. (b) Laminated interface produces Ohmic contact to another layer showing high fill factor and low series resistance [39]. (c) The processing step of thermal evaporation of a metal onto the active layer is eliminated which reduces the high parasitic resistance [37, 38]. (d) Inert atmosphere for the fabrication of device is not necessary [3740]. (e) The device is self-encapsulated and mechanically protected from both sides [39]. (f) The methodology allows one to prepare, optimize, and characterize two parts of the device independently before bringing them to contact [3740]. (g) All solution processing fabrication of device is possible. (h) It is cost effective and simple method, which allows the fabrication of multijunction solar cell [37].

One way to fabricate multijunction solar cell is by connecting two polymer blend layers with introduction of a (semi) transparent metal or semiconducting layer between the blend layers, which is generally named as tandem solar cell. In tandem structure, the intermediate layer works as charge recombination center; therefore the device has an open circuit voltage ( 𝑉 o c ) that is the sum of the values of two devices, whereas short circuit ( 𝐽 s c ) of the device is restricted to the smaller value of the two. On the other hand, in multilayer device, the two active layers are stacked directly (i.e., without any interfacial layer). Thus the device has a 𝐽 s c value that is the sum of the values of the two cells. Recently, Sun et al. [52] demonstrated the fabrication of multilayer structure solar cell from solution-processing method. This unique temperature-dependent solubility of poly(2,5-bis(3-alkylthiophen-2-yl)thieno[3,2-b]thiophene) (PBTTT) enabled to spin-coat a solution of PBTTT at 70°C and another overlaid polymer (MDMO-PPV) from the same solvent at room temperature without dissolving the underlying PBTTT layer. As a result, the fabrication of multilayer BHJ solar cells from all-solution process was achieved. Postannealed bilayer bulk-heterojunction devices yielded a 𝑉 o c of 0.59 V, 𝐽 s c values of 10.1–10.7 mA/cm2, FF of 0.55, and PCE of 3.0–3.2%, showing an increased 𝐽 s c and PCE by a factor of 2 with respect to their single layer counterparts. Preparation of multilayer device from solution processing is difficult task because the underlying polymer layer may dissolve from the solution processing of the second polymeric solution. The follow-up work by Nakamura et al. demonstrates the fabrication of multilayer structure BHJ solar cell from lamination process [37, 53]. Multilayer structures consisting of two blend layers of poly(3-hexylthiophene):(6,6)-phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl ester (P3HT:PCBM) and poly{N-[1-(2′-ethylhexyl)-3-ethylheptanyl]-dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyrrole-2,6-diyl-alt-4,7-di(2-thienyl)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole-5′,5′′-diyl} (PDTPDTBT):PCBM were prepared by a simple thermal lamination technique under heat and pressure [37]. They demonstrated improvement in PCE of inverted-structure laminated photovoltaic devices from 1.6% to 2.6% based on single structural BHJ solar cell. The insertion of a PEDOT:PSS layer, between the metal electrode and polymer layer, further improved the PCE to 3.3%. However, lamination of two parts of the device to finish the final OPV structure was shown a decade ago for polymer-polymer bilayers [54].

Heat and pressure are important parameters to laminate two different electrodes. Nakamura et al. suggested that adhesive materials were not necessary when heat and pressure were applied simultaneously [37, 53]. However, Bailey et al. noticed that 25% of devices without adhesive material delaminated when plates of the press were pull apart [39]. Conducting polymers like d-sorbitol are mixed with PEDOT:PSS to improve adhesive property. D-sorbitol is a transparent glue, exhibiting a conductivity of 102 Scm−1 that could effectively laminate various substrates electrically and mechanically. D-sorbitol melts and penetrates into the polymer at temperature above 98–100°C [40]. Bailey et al. selected flexible conducting substrate (PET) as anode to fabricate laminated solar cell with PET/Ag/PEDOT:PSS (d-sorbitol)//P3HT:PCBM/ZnO/ITO/glass configuration. The PET substrates improve device reproducibility because of its flexible nature. Nonflexible glass substrate may break with pressure during lamination. The best-laminated device shows PCE of 3.19%, which is higher than the control devices produced with the best-evaporated top metal electrode. Such improvement comes from the increased work function of Ag metal electrode with air oxidation [39]. Similarly, Yuan et al. [38] increases the work function of Ag film by ultraviolet/ozone treatment for improved photovoltaic response. This treatment increases the coverage of the adhesive material (d-sorbitol) from 70% to 100%. The device architecture was PET/Ag/d-sorbitol//P3HT:PCBM/Cs2Co3/ITO/glass. Hot plate lamination technique also promotes the crystallization of PCBM material [38]. Under the one-sun simulated irradiation, the device with laminated PET/Ag/d-sorbitol anode shows the highest PCE compared to devices without Ag electrodes. The reduction of device performance in PET/ITO/d-sorbitol architecture is believed to be due to (a) the increase in sheet resistance of ITO substrates during multiple bending and (b) penetration of ITO fragments into the soft polymer layers during the lamination process that may form current leakage paths. Similarly, improvements in device performance with PEN/Ag/d-sorbitol anode have been explained as (a) better light harvest from the light reflection from top Ag anode film and (b) efficient charge collection, and (c) oxidation of Ag surface increases the anode work function and surface energy.

4. Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Using Conjugated Polymers as HTMs

Materials and technique that are used to fabricate inverted and laminated OPVs are almost same and similar to the materials and technique used to fabricate solid-state DSSCs that use conjugated polymers as HTMs. The prime differences are the sensitization of the ZnO or TiO2 layers, its thickness, and role of the compact layer. Organic material like spiro-OMeTAD possesses higher PCE in solid-state DSSCs family [55]. But spiro-OMeTAD has low hole mobility and high fabrication cost compared to the conjugated organic polymer materials. Therefore, p-type conjugated polymer materials are one of the promising materials in this case [5658]. External quantum efficiency (EQE) shows the large contribution of photocurrent generation from the sensitized layer [5985]. Short circuit condition requires the electron injection from the excited dye molecule into conduction band of TiO2 and transfer of the hole through polymer layer to the back contact electrode. For this, several requirements have to be fulfilled [59]. They are as follows.(a)The p-type polymeric material must be highly transparent in the spectral range, where the dye absorbs light. (b)p-type polymeric material must be available for depositing without dissolving or degrading the dye monolayer on TiO2 nanocrystallites. (c)The excited state energy level of dye should be located above the conduction band of TiO2, and the ground state must be below the upper edge of the valence band of the p-type polymeric material. This is essential for electron transfer from the excited dye molecule to the conduction band of TiO2 and hole transfer to the valence band of the p-type polymeric material.

Various triarylamine-based polymers [6063], poly(3-alkylthiophene)s [6476], polypyrrole [7780], polyaniline [8185], are studied as HTMs in solid-state DSSCs. The polymers cast from solutions must penetrate into the pores between the nanoparticles and should form a good contact with the absorbed dye. Karthikeyan et al. [86] demonstrated the self-organized interacted molecular between the dye and polymer layers, for the efficient transfer of hole from excited dye to polymer material. Actually, they developed ruthenium complexes carrying different triphenylamine-based donor groups, which combine with a triarylamine material of spiro-OMeTAD. The result indicated that the dye/spiro-OMeTAD interfaces are self-organized by oleophilic interaction resulting in improved photocurrent and efficiency. Similarly, Jiang et al. [74] also reported the dyes with oleophilic thienyl groups, which show power conversion efficiency of up to 2.7%. Such improvement in PCE is also believed because of self-organized interface between dye molecules and polymer material.

5. Laminated Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell

In the previous section, it was noticed that lamination as a method of device fabrication has several advantages over conventional metal evaporation method. Therefore, we tried to fabricate solid-state DSSC from hot plate lamination technique. Poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) was spin coated on the surface of dye sensitized TiO2 layer. Likewise, in flexible ITO substrate, mix solution of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) and d-sorbitol was spin coated. The two different electrodes were then pressed one above another on hot plate and laminated under heat and pressure. The performance of the device improves using flexible Au-coated ITO substrate.

5.1. Experimental Details

FTO substrates were cleaned with acetone, methanol followed by drying in nitrogen gas. It is then ozone treated for 10 mins, to remove remaining organic materials from the substrates. A compact layer of T i O 𝑥 paste (PASOL HPW-18NR) was spin coated on the cleaned FTO substrate at 2200 rpm for 40 secs. This compact layer removes the possibility of short in the device. In this FTO- T i O 𝑥 compact layer, nanoporous TiO2 slurry was spin coated to make TiO2 layer of about 2 μm thickness.

5.1.1. Preparation of TiO2 Slurry

TiO2 slurry is prepared in the following way. At first, 4 mg of P25 TiO2 nanoparticles was mixed with 0.4 mL acetylacetone (2,4-Pentanedione) and ground for a few minutes till it changes to light golden color. In the second step, deionized water (0.5 mL) was poured on it and ground for 5 minutes. At every 5 minutes, the same amount of deionized water (0.5 mL) was added and ground. This process was repeated for 7 times then 2 mL of TritonX (30 vol%) was mixed on the solution. Finally, fine PEG (0.4 mg) was added to the TiO2 slurry and ground for a few minutes (10 minutes). The prepared TiO2 paste was spin coated on the surface of FTO- T i O 𝑥 compact layer.

5.1.2. Device Fabrication

The above substrates were sintered at 450°C for 30 min and sensitized with Ru-dye (N719) for 18 hours in ethanol solution. P3HT (17 mg/mL) solution in 1,2-dichlorobenzene was spin coated on the surface of dye-sensitized TiO2 layer at 2000 rpm for 40 sec. This completes the fabrication of one (bottom electrode) part of the laminated solid-state DSSC. Another part (top electrode) was prepared in flexible ITO plastic substrate (with and without Au deposition) by spin coating PEDOT:PSS (with 10 wt% of D-sorbitol) at 500 rpm for 30 sec. Finally, the two parts of the device were placed one above another at hot plates and laminated under heat (120°C) and pressure (1.2 Mpa) in air. Before lamination, the edges of the FTO substrates were covered with plastic tape so that the cracked or bare spaces at the edges do not touch the upper electrode.

5.1.3. Characterization

Surface morphologies of TiO2 films were studied using SEM (Hitachi S-3000H). The current-voltage (J-V) characteristics of the devices were measured by a JASCO instrument with a white light xenon lamp under one-sun illumination (AM1.5 G, 100 mW/cm2). All characterizations were carried out in an ambient environment. Ultraviolet/visible/near infrared (UV/VIS/NIR) spectrophotometry was taken from JASCO V-570. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were obtained by Spa 300 SII Seiko Instrument.

5.2. Results and Discussion
5.2.1. Improvement in Transparency after TiOx Coating

Figure 2 shows the improvement in transparency of FTO substrates from 400 nm to 750 nm wavelength after spin coating of T i O 𝑥 solution. The reason for this transmission improvement is unknown at present condition because of the lack of chemical compositions of the commercial product (PASOL HPW-18NR).

Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show the AFM images of FTO glass substrate before and after spin coating of T i O 𝑥 solution, respectively. It depicts that the RMS roughness of FTO substrates reduced from 3 . 0 6 0 𝐸 + 0 1 nm to 8.317 nm and the peak-to-valley (P-V) distance was also reduced from 2 . 2 3 3 𝐸 + 0 2 nm to 7 . 7 7 6 𝐸 + 0 1 nm. This measurement indicates that the roughness and P-V distance improve after T i O 𝑥 coating.

5.2.2. Surface Morphology of TiO2 Films

Figure 4(a) shows the SEM image of the TiO2 film (not T i O 𝑥 ) on FTO substrate. After sintering, cracks were observed in the film. With liquid electrolyte, DSSC works well even though the conducting FTO substrate is in direct contact with the electrolyte at the FTO/electrolyte interface. But for solid-state DSSC, this becomes the problem. Crack-free titanium layer was prepared by mixing the same amount of commercial available titanium paste (Pasol-HPW-18NR) with our prepared paste with 1 : 1 ratio. Thin film produced from the mixed slurry lacks cracks after sintering as shown in Figure 4(b).

5.2.3. Device Characterization and Discussion

Figure 5(a) shows the device configuration of solid-state DSSC fabricated from hot press lamination. The melting point of d-sorbitol is about 90~100°C. After reaching to its melting point, it laminates two electrodes electrically and mechanically. Its solvent-free electric glue exhibits a conductivity of 102 S/cm [40]. Figure 5(b) shows the photograph of the laminated PET/ITO/PEDOT:PSS (d-sorbitol)//P3HT/N719-TiO2/ T i O 𝑥 /FTO/glass substrate (the // represents the laminated interfaces), photovoltaic device. The device fabricated without d-sorbitol does not show adhesive property.

Figure 6 shows the J-V characteristics of the photovoltaic devices measured under AM 1.5 simulated solar radiations. The cells were prepared with and without Au-deposited ITO-PET substrate. The mask of area 0.16 cm2 was used during 𝐽 - 𝑉 measurement. Under illumination, Au-deposited ITO-PET device shows 𝐽 s c and 𝑉 o c about 0.031 mA/cm2 and 0.122 V, respectively. The fill factor (FF) and white light conversion efficiency (η) are about 0.272 and 0.001%, respectively. A twin reference cell fabricated on identical parameters with ITO-PET substrate shows no good photovoltaic response. We believe that such improvement in photovoltaic properties is due to excess light harvest from light reflection through top metal electrode and good contact between metal electrode and polymer layer. In bare ITO substrate, it may be possible that ITO fragments penetrate the soft polymer layer during the lamination process that may form current leakage path. The photovoltaic properties that are stated here are just a report on the successful fabrication of solid-state DSSCs from hot plate lamination method. There is a lot of scope to optimize the device parameters for the improved photovoltaic properties. Sensitizing TiO2 particles with dye of high molar extinction coefficient, optimization of parameters, improving crystallinity of polymer materials, and incorporating quantum dots and carbon nanomaterials with polymer or TiO2 particles are some of the simple ways to improve the device performance. The control device parameters will be discussed on separate communication.

Generally, p-type semiconducting polymers that accept holes from the dye cation are important. In FTO/ T i O 𝑥 /N719-TiO2/P3HT//PEDOT:PSS (d-sorbitol)/Au/ITO/PET configuration, we believe that photoexcited dye molecules inject electrons into the conduction band of TiO2 ( 𝐸 c b 4 eV) and hole towards P3HT. The favorable charge transportation is suitable because the excited state energy level of N719 ( L U M O 3 . 7  eV) is located above the conduction band of TiO2, and the ground state ( H O M O 5 . 5  eV) level is below the upper edge of the valance band of the P3HT ( 𝐸 v b 5 . 1  eV). This is essential for electron transfer from the excited dye molecule to the conduction band of TiO2 and hole transfer to the valance band of P3HT. P3HT possesses high hole mobility of up to 0.1 cm2 V−1s−1. Energetically favorable charge transportation and band diagram are shown in Figure 7.

6. Conclusion

Inverted organic solar cell architecture allows depositing various layers of material onto flexible substrates from solution processing to industrial roll-to-roll manufacture. This device architecture is further modified by depositing, optimizing, and characterizing two parts of the organic layers independently in laminated organic solar cell. The power conversion capacities of inverted and laminated solar cells are almost same or higher to the power conversion efficiency of devices fabricated from conventional process. More interestingly, the device architecture of inverted solar cells is similar to the device architecture of solid-state DSSCs that use conjugated polymer as HTMs, which make it possible for the fabrication of laminated solid-state DSSCs. Fabrication of solid-state DSSC from hot plate lamination is simple and cost-effective method. The present studies offer novel directions for achieving high-efficiency solid-state DSSCs by optimizing and characterizing two different parts of the device independently before bringing them to contact.

Acknowledgment

I. Khatri would like to thank Kosuke Ezaka for his kind cooperation and support.

References

  1. J. Y. Kim, S. H. Kim, H.-H. Lee et al., “New architecture for high-efficiency polymer photovoltaic cells using solution-based titanium oxide as an optical spacer,” Advanced Materials, vol. 18, pp. 572–576, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Yakimov and S. R. Forrest, “High photovoltage multiple-heterojunction organic solar cells incorporating interfacial metallic nanoclusters,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 1667–1669, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. W. M. Blom, V. D. Mihailetchi, L. J. A. Koster, and D. E. Markov, “Device physics of polymer:Fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells,” Advanced Materials, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1551–1566, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. F. Service, “Outlook brightens for plastic solar cells,” Science, vol. 332, no. 6027, p. 293, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. Dennler, M. C. Scharber, T. Ameri et al., “Design rules for donors in bulk-heterojunction tandem solar cells-towards 15 % energy-conversion efficiency,” Advanced Materials, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 579–583, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. Li, C.-W. Chu, V. Shrotriya, J. Huang, and Y. Yang, “Efficient inverted polymer solar cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, no. 25, Article ID 253503, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. H. Hsieh, Y. J. Cheng, P. J. Li et al., “Highly efficient and stable inverted polymer solar cells integrated with a cross-linked fullerene material as an interlayer,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 132, no. 13, pp. 4887–4893, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Glatthaar, M. Niggemann, B. Zimmermann et al., “Organic solar cells using inverted layer sequence,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 491, no. 1-2, pp. 298–300, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. W. Zhao, P. Liu, X. W. Sun, S. T. Tan, L. Ke, and A. K. K. Kyaw, “An inverted organic solar cell with an ultrathin Ca electron-transporting layer and MoO3 hole-transporting layer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 95, Article ID 153304, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. C. Krebs, “Air stable polymer photovoltaics based on a process free from vacuum steps and fullerenes,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 715–726, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. W. Gaynor, J. Y. Lee, and P. Peumans, “Fully solution-processed inverted polymer solar cells with laminated nanowire electrodes,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 30–34, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. Girotto, B. P. Rand, S. Steudel, J. Genoe, and P. Heremans, “Nanoparticle-based, spray-coated silver top contacts for efficient polymer solar cells,” Organic Electronics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 735–740, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. K. Hau, H. L. Yip, K. Leong, and A. K. Y. Jen, “Spraycoating of silver nanoparticle electrodes for inverted polymer solar cells,” Organic Electronics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 719–723, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. S. White, D. C. Olson, S. E. Shaheen, N. Kopidakis, and D. S. Ginley, “Inverted bulk-heterojunction organic photovoltaic device using a solution-derived ZnO underlayer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, no. 14, Article ID 143517, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. K. Hau, H.-L. Yip, H. Ma, and A. K.-Y. Jen, “High performance ambient processed inverted polymer solar cells through interfacial modification with a fullerene self-assembled monolayer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 23, Article ID 233304, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. Waldauf, M. Morana, P. Denk et al., “Highly efficient inverted organic photovoltaics using solution based titanium oxide as electron selective contact,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, no. 23, Article ID 233517, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. Steim, S. A. Choulis, P. Schilinsky, and C. J. Brabec, “Interface modification for highly efficient organic photovoltaics,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 9, Article ID 093303, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. K. Hau, H. L. Yip, O. Acton, N. S. Baek, H. Ma, and A. K. Y. Jen, “Interfacial modification to improve inverted polymer solar cells,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 42, pp. 5113–5119, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H.-H. Liao, L.-M. Chen, Z. Xu, G. Li, and Y. Yang, “Highly efficient inverted polymer solar cell by low temperature annealing of Cs2 C O3 interlayer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, Article ID 173303, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y. I. Lee, J. H. Youn, M. S. Ryu, J. Kim, H. T. Moon, and J. Jang, “Highly efficient inverted poly(3-hexylthiophene): methano-fullerene [6,6]-phenyl C71-butyric acid methyl ester bulk heterojunction solar cell with Cs2CO3 and MoO3,” Organic Electronics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 353–357, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. W. Zhao, S. T. Tan, L. Ke et al., “Optimization of an inverted organic solar cell,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 985–991, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. Hori, H. Moritou, N. Fukuoka, J. Sakamoto, A. Fujii, and M. Ozaki, “Photovoltaic properties in interpenetrating heterojunction organic solar cells utilizing MoO3 and ZnO charge transport buffer layers,” Materials, vol. 3, pp. 4915–4921, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  23. T. Hori, T. Shibata, V. Kittichungchit et al., “MoO3 buffer layer effect on photovoltaic properties of interpenetrating heterojunction type organic solar cells,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 518, no. 2, pp. 522–525, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. K. K. Kyaw, X. W. Sun, C. Y. Jiang, G. Q. Lo, D. W. Zhao, and D. L. Kwong, “An inverted organic solar cell employing a sol-gel derived ZnO electron selective layer and thermal evaporated MoO3 hole selective layer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, Article ID 221107, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. Tao, S. Ruan, X. Zhang et al., “Performance improvement of inverted polymer solar cells with different top electrodes by introducing a MoO3 buffer layer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, Article ID 193307, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Schmidt, H. Flügge, T. Winkler, T. Bülow, T. Riedl, and W. Kowalsky, “Efficient semitransparent inverted organic solar cells with indium tin oxide top electrode,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, Article ID 243302, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. V. Shrotriya, G. Li, Y. Yao, C.-W. Chu, and Y. Yang, “Transition metal oxides as the buffer layer for polymer photovoltaic cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, Article ID 073508, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. N. Espinosa, H. F. Dam, D. M. Tanenbaum, J. W. Andreasen, M. Jorgensen, and F. C. Krebs, “Roll-to-roll processing of inverted polymer solar cells using hydrated vanadium(V)oxide as a PEDOT:PSS replacement,” Materials, vol. 4, pp. 169–182, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  29. C. Tao, S. Ruan, G. Xie et al., “Role of tungsten oxide in inverted polymer solar cells,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, Article ID 043311, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Y. Chan, C. S. Lee, S. L. Lai et al., “Efficient organic photovoltaic devices using a combination of exciton blocking layer and anodic buffer layer,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 100, no. 9, Article ID 094506, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. K. Hau, H.-L. Yip, J. Zou, and A. K.-Y. Jen, “Indium tin oxide-free semi-transparent inverted polymer solar cells using conducting polymer as both bottom and top electrodes,” Organic Electronics, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1401–1407, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. B.-Y. Yu, A. Tsai, S.-P. Tsai et al., “Efficient inverted solar cells using TiO2 nanotube arrays,” Nanotechnology, vol. 19, no. 25, Article ID 255202, pp. 2552021–2552025, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Weickert, H. Sun, C. Palumbiny, H. C. Hesse, and L. Schmidt-Mende, “Spray-deposited PEDOT: PSS for inverted organic solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 2371–2374, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. Y. Li, T. C. Wen, and T. F. Guo, “Sulfonated poly(diphenylamine) as a novel hole-collecting layer in polymer photovoltaic cells,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 37, pp. 4478–4482, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. C. Krebs, S. A. Gevorgyan, and J. Atstrup, “A roll-to-roll process to flexible polymer solar cells: model studies, manufacture and operational stability studies,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, pp. 5442–5451, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. K. Hau, H. L. Yip, and A. K. Y. Jen, “A review on the development of the inverted polymer solar cell architecture,” Polymer Reviews, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 474–510, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. Nakamura, C. Yang, E. Zhou, K. Tajima, and K. Hashimoto, “Polymer bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices with multilayer structures prepared by thermal lamination,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 2703–2706, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Yuan, Y. Bi, and J. Huang, “Achieving high efficiency laminated polymer solar cell with interfacial modified metallic electrode and pressure induced crystallization,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 98, Article ID 063306, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. B. A. Bailey, M. O. Reese, D. C. Olson, S. E. Shaheen, and N. Kopidakis, “Air-processed organic photovoltaic devices fabricated with hot press lamination,” Organic Electronics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 108–112, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. Ouyang and Y. Yang, “Conducting polymer as transparent electric glue,” Advanced Materials, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 2141–2144, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. Jørgensen, K. Norrman, and F. C. Krebs, “Stability/degradation of polymer solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 686–714, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. Suemori, T. Miyata, M. Yokoyama, and M. Hiramoto, “Organic solar cells protected by very thick naphthalene tetracarboxylic anhydride films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, no. 25, pp. 6269–6271, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. K. Suemori, M. Yokoyama, and M. Hiramoto, “Electrical shorting of organic photovoltaic films resulting from metal migration,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 99, Article ID 036109, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  44. T. H. Lee, J. C. A. Huang, G. L. Pakhomov et al., “Organic-oxide cathode buffer layer in fabricating high-performance polymer light-emitting diodes,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 18, no. 19, pp. 3036–3042, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. Gu, V. Bulovic, P. E. Burrows, S. R. Forrest, and N. E. Thompson, “Transparent organic light emitting devices,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 68, pp. 2606–2608, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. H.-K. Kim, D.-G. Kim, K.-S. Lee et al., “Plasma damage-free sputtering of indium tin oxide cathode layers for top-emitting organic light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 86, no. 18, Article ID 183503, pp. 1–3, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. K. H. Yim, Z. Zheng, Z. Liang, R. H. Friend, W. T. S. Huck, and J. S. Kim, “Efficient conjugated-polymer optoelectronic devices fabricated by thin-film transfer-printing technique,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1012–1019, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. L. Chen, P. Degenaar, and D. D. C. Bradley, “Polymer transfer printing: application to layer coating, pattern definition, and diode dark current blocking,” Advanced Materials, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1679–1683, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. J. H. Huang, Z. Y. Ho, T. H. Kuo, D. Kekuda, C. W. Chu, and K. C. Ho, “Fabrication of multilayer organic solar cells through a stamping technique,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 24, pp. 4077–4080, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. D. H. Wang, D. G. Choi, K. J. Lee, S. H. Im, O. O. Park, and J. H. Park, “Unexpected solid-solid intermixing in a bilayer of poly(3-hexylthiophene) and [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acidmethyl ester via stamping transfer,” Organic Electronics, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1376–1380, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. D. H. Wang, D. G. Choi, K. J. Lee, O. O. Park, and J. H. Park, “Photovoltaic devices with an active layer from a stamping transfer technique: single layer versus double layer,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 9584–9588, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. Q. Sun, K. Park, and L. Dai, “Liquid crystalline polymers for efficient bilayer-bulk-heterojunction solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 18, pp. 7892–7897, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Nakamura, C. Yang, K. Tajima, and K. Hashimoto, “High-performance polymer photovoltaic devices with inverted structure prepared by thermal lamination,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 1681–1684, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. Granström, K. Petritsch, A. C. Arias, A. Lux, M. R. Andersson, and R. H. Friend, “Laminated fabrication of polymeric photovoltaic diodes,” Nature, vol. 395, no. 6699, pp. 257–260, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. U. Bach, D. Lupo, P. Comte et al., “Solid-state dye-sensitized mesoporous TiO2 solar cells with high photon-to-electron conversion efficiencies,” Nature, vol. 395, no. 6702, pp. 583–585, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. T. J. Savenije, J. M. Warman, and A. Goossens, “Visible light sensitisation of titanium dioxide using a phenylene vinylene polymer,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 287, no. 1-2, pp. 148–153, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  57. A. C. Arango, S. A. Carter, and P. J. Brock, “Charge transfer in photovoltaics consisting of interpenetrating networks of conjugated polymer and TiO2 nanoparticles,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 1698–1700, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  58. K. M. Coakley, Y. Liu, C. Goh, and M. D. McGehee, “Ordered organic-inorganic bulk heterojunction photovoltaic cells,” Materials Research Society Bulletin, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 37–40, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  59. D. Gebeyehu, C. J. Brabec, N. S. Sariciftci et al., “Hybrid solar cells based on dye-sensitized nanoporous TiO2 electrodes and conjugated polymers as hole transport materials,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 279–287, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. L. Schmidt-Mende and M. Grätzel, “TiO2 pore-filling and its effect on the efficiency of solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 500, no. 1-2, pp. 296–301, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. J. E. Kroeze, N. Hirata, and L. Schmidt-Mende, “Parameters influencing charge separation in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells using novel hole conductors,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 16, pp. 1832–1838, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. K. R. Haridas, J. Ostrauskaite, M. Thelakkat, M. Heim, R. Bilke, and D. Haarer, “Synthesis of low melting hole conductor systems based on triarylamines and application in dye sensitized solar cells,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 121, no. 1–3, pp. 1573–1574, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. K. Peter, H. Wietasch, B. Peng, and M. Thelakkat, “Dual-functional materials for interface modifications in solid-state dye-sensitised TiO2 solar cells,” Applied Physics A, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 65–71, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. J. Roncali, “Conjugated poly(thiophenes): synthesis, functionalization, and applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 92, pp. 711–738, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  65. Y.-J. Cheng, S.-H. Yang, and C.-S. Hsu, “Synthesis of conjugated polymers for organic solar cell applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 109, no. 11, pp. 5868–5923, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. C. Houarner-Rassin, E. Blart, P. Buvat, and F. Odobel, “Solid-state dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells based on a sensitizer covalently wired to a hole conducting polymer,” Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 789–793, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. N. Kudo, S. Honda, Y. Shimazaki, H. Ohkita, S. Ito, and H. Benten, “Improvement of charge injection efficiency in organic-inorganic hybrid solar cells by chemical modification of metal oxides with organic molecules,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 90, no. 18, Article ID 183513, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. C. Zafer, C. Karapire, N. S. Serdar, and S. Icli, “Characterization of N, N′-bis-2-(1-hydoxy-4-methylpentyl)-3, 4, 9, 10-perylene bis (dicarboximide) sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 solar cells with polythiophene hole conductors,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. M. Wang and X. Wang, “P3HT/TiO2 bulk-heterojunction solar cell sensitized by a perylene derivative,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 91, no. 19, pp. 1782–1787, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. K. Takahashi, T. Nakanishi, T. Yamaguchi, J.-I. Nakamura, and K. Murata, “Performance enhancement by blending merocyanine photosensitizer in TiO2/polythiophen solid-state solar cells,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 714–715, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. E. Lancelle-Beltran, P. Prené, C. Boscher, P. Belleville, P. Buvat, and C. Sanchez, “All-solid-state dye-sensitized nanoporous TiO2 hybrid solar cells with high energy-conversion efficiency,” Advanced Materials, vol. 18, no. 19, pp. 2579–2582, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. R. Zhu, C. Y. Jiang, B. Liu, and S. Ramakrishna, “Highly efficient nanoporous TiO2-polythiophene hybrid solar cells based on interfacial modification using a metal-free organic dye,” Advanced Materials, vol. 21, pp. 994–1000, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  73. J. Krüger, R. Plass, L. Cevey, M. Piccirelli, M. Grätzel, and U. Bach, “High efficiency solid-state photovoltaic device due to inhibition of interface charge recombination,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, pp. 2085–2087, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. K. J. Jiang, K. Manseki, Y. H. Yu et al., “Photovoltaics based on hybridization of effective dye-sensitized titanium oxide and hole-conductive polymer P3HT,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 19, pp. 2481–2485, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  75. G. K. Mor, S. Kim, M. Paulose et al., “Visible to near-infrared light harvesting in TiO2 nanotube array-P3HT based heterojunction solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 9, pp. 4250–4257, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. A. Chang, J. H. Rhee, S. H. Im et al., “High-performance nanostructured inorganicâ-organic heterojunction solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 2609–2612, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. K. Murakoshi, R. Kogure, Y. Wada, and S. Yanagida, “Solid state dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cell with polypyrrole as hole transport layer,” Chemistry Letters, no. 5, pp. 471–472, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  78. K. Murakoshi, R. Kogure, Y. Wada, and S. Yanagida, “Fabrication of solid-state dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells combined with polypyrrole,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 55, no. 1-2, pp. 113–125, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  79. T. Kitamura, M. Maitani, M. Matsuda, Y. Wada, and S. Yanagida, “Improved solid-state dye solar cells with polypyrrole using a carbon-based counter electrode,” Chemistry Letters, no. 10, pp. 1054–1055, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  80. R. Cervini, Y. Cheng, and G. Simon, “Solid-state Ru-dye solar cells using polypyrrole as a hole conductor,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. S. X. Tan, J. Zhai, M. X. Wan, L. Jiang, and D. B. Zhu, “Polyaniline as a hole transport material to prepare solid solar cells,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 137, no. 1-3, pp. 1511–1512, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. S. Tan, J. Zhai, B. Xue et al., “Property influence of polyanilines on photovoltaic behaviors of dye-sensitized solar cells,” Langmuir, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2934–2937, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. S. Tan, J. Zhai, M. Wan et al., “Influence of small molecules in conducting polyaniline on the photovoltaic properties of solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 108, no. 48, pp. 18693–18697, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. H. S. Kim and C. C. Wamser, “Photoelectropolymerization of aniline in a dye-sensitized solar cell,” Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, vol. 5, 955 pages, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. S. Ameen, M. S. Akhtar, G. S. Kim, Y. S. Kim, O. B. Yang, and H. S. Shin, “Plasma-enhanced polymerized aniline/TiO2 dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 487, no. 1-2, pp. 382–386, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. C. S. Karthikeyan, H. Wietasch, and M. Thelakkat, “Highly efficient solid-state dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells using donor-antenna dyes capable of multistep charge-transfer cascades,” Advanced Materials, vol. 19, pp. 1091–1095, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Ishwor Khatri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

2693 Views | 1564 Downloads | 5 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder