Table of Contents
ISRN Botany
Volume 2012, Article ID 193807, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/193807
Research Article

No Reproductive Interference from an Alien to a Native Species in Cerastium (Caryophyllaceae) at the Stage of Seed Production

Division of Urban Environment, Osaka City Institute of Public Health and Environmental Sciences, 8-34 Tojo-cho, Tennoji, Osaka 543-0026, Japan

Received 28 November 2012; Accepted 20 December 2012

Academic Editors: F. A. Culianez-Macia and T. L. Weir

Copyright © 2012 Koh-Ichi Takakura. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Gröning and A. Hochkirch, “Reproductive interference between animal species,” The Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 257–282, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. M. C. Ribeiro and A. Spielman, “The Satyr Effect: a model predicting parapatry and species extinction,” The American Naturalist, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 513–528, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  3. E. Kuno, “Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference,” Researches on Population Ecology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 275–284, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Hochkirch, J. Gröning, and A. Bücker, “Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 633–642, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. A. R. Eaton, C. B. Fenster, J. Hereford, S. Q. Huang, and R. H. Ree, “Floral diversity and community structure in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae),” Ecology, vol. 93, no. 8, supplement, pp. S182–S194, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  6. K. I. Takakura, T. Nishida, T. Matsumoto, and S. Nishida, “Alien dandelion reduces the seed-set of a native congener through frequency-dependent and one-sided effects,” Biological Invasions, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 973–981, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Matsumoto, K. I. Takakura, and T. Nishida, “Alien pollen grains interfere with the reproductive success of native congener,” Biological Invasions, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1617–1626, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. I. Takakura and S. Fujii, “Reproductive interference and salinity tolerance differentiate habitat use between two alien cockleburs: Xanthium occidentale and X. italicum (Compositae),” Plant Ecology, vol. 206, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. A. Dame and K. Petren, “Behavioural mechanisms of invasion and displacement in Pacific island geckos (Hemidactylus),” Animal Behaviour, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 1165–1173, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. D'Amore, E. Kirby, and V. Hemingway, “Reproductive interference by an invasive species: an evolutionary trap?” Herpetological Conservation and Biology, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 325–330, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. W. Crowder, M. I. Sitvarin, and Y. Carrière, “Plasticity in mating behaviour drives asymmetric reproductive interference in whiteflies,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 579–587, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Rosenthal, “The “file-drawer problem” and tolerance for null results,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 85–97, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  13. R. B. Runquist and M. L. Stanton, “Asymmetric and frequency-dependent pollinator-mediated interactions may influence competitive displacement in two vernal pool plants,” Ecology Letters. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Nishida, K. I. Takakura, T. Nishida, T. Matsumoto, and M. M. Kanaoka, “Differential effects of reproductive interference by an alien congener on native Taraxacum species,” Biological Invasions, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 439–447, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Kitagawa, “Caryophyllaceae,” in Wildflowers of Japan, Y. Satake, T. Ooi, S. Kitamura, T. Watari, and T. Tominari, Eds., pp. 39–45, Heibonsha, Tokyo, Japan, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  16. T. Makino, Researches on Wild Plants, Sanbunsha, Tokyo, Japan, 1907.
  17. H. Fukuhara, R. Murata, H. Noda, and H. Igarashi, “Comparative ecology of the alien species, Cerastium glomeratum and native species, C. holosteoides var. hallaisanense: (1) distribution and life history,” Memoirs of the Faculty of Education. Natural Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–37, 2007 (Japanese). View at Google Scholar
  18. USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program, “Cerastium glomeratum Thuill,” in Germplasm Resources Information Network [Online Database], Beltsville, Md, USA, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  19. B. M. Bolker, M. E. Brooks, C. J. Clark et al., “Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 127–135, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2012.
  21. M. Ownbey, “Natural hybridization and amphiploidy in the genus Tragopogon,” American Journal of Botany, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 487–499, 1950. View at Google Scholar
  22. P. J. Brownsey, “Asplenium hybrids in the New Zealand flora,” New Zealand Journal of Botany, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 601–637, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  23. A. Aparicio, “Fitness components of the hybrid Phlomis x margaritae aparicio and silvestre (Lamiaceae),” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 331–343, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Yoshimura and C. W. Clark, “Population dynamics of sexual and resource competition,” Theoretical Population Biology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 121–131, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus