Research Article

Effect of Tillage, Irrigation, and Nutrient Levels on Growth and Yield of Sweet Potato in Rice Fallow

Table 8

Effect of different treatments on consumptive use of water by sweet potato in rice fallow during 2007-2008.

TreatmentMoisture contribution from profile storage
(mm)
Evaporation
(mm)
Effective
rainfall (mm)
Consumptive
use (mm)
Water use efficiency (kg mm−1)
0–15 cm15–30 cm30–45 cm45–60 cmTotal

Method of tillage
Minimum tillage34.431.929.126.3121.624.858.2204.654.6
(28.3)*(26.2)(23.9)(21.6)(100.0)
Conventional28.928.828.225.6111.522.758.2192.460.6
(25.9)(25.8)(25.3)(23.0)(100.0)
LSD ( 𝑃 = 0 . 0 5 )13.5NS

No. of irrigation
321.721.521.419.584.114.458.2156.759.5
(25.8)(25.6)(25.4)(23.2)(100.0)
529.031.129.024.3113.423.558.2195.159.5
(25.6)(27.4)(25.6)(21.4)(100.0)
740.140.839.132.3152.333.458.2243.953.8
(26.3)(26.8)(25.7)(21.2)(100.0)
LSD ( 𝑃 = 0 . 0 5 )5.03.6

Nutrient levels (kg h−1)
0-0-027.329.227.624.5108.623.858.2190.652.8
(25.1)(26.9)(25.4)(22.6)(100.0)
37.5-25-37.531.130.830.225.1117.223.858.2199.258.4
(26.5)(26.3)(25.8)(21.4)(100.0)
75-50-7533.832.731.226.1123.923.858.2205.961.7
(27.3)(26.4)(25.2)(21.1)(100.0)
LSD ( 𝑃 = 0 . 0 5 )3.42.4

*Percentage values are given within parentheses.
NS: Not significant.