Table of Contents
ISRN Ophthalmology
Volume 2012, Article ID 295613, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/295613
Clinical Study

Anthropometry, Amplitude of Accommodation, and Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error in a Nigerian Population

1Department of Optometry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
2Eye Clinic, Faith Medical Complex, Benin City, Nigeria

Received 14 May 2012; Accepted 9 July 2012

Academic Editors: N. Ardjomand, A. M. Avunduk, and Y. F. Shih

Copyright © 2012 Eghosasere Iyamu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Grosvenor, “Anomalies of refraction,” in Primary Care Optometry—Anomalies of Refraction and Binocular Vision, pp. 3–17, Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton, Mass, USA, 3rd edition, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. G. Bennet and R. B. Rabbetts, “Accommadation and presbyopia,” in Clinical Visual Optics, pp. 140–142, Butterworths, London, UK, 2nd edition, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. O. Mutti, G. L. Mitchell, L. A. Jones et al., “Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during emmetropization in infants,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 3074–3080, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. J. Johnson, A. Matthews, and E. S. Perkins, “Survey of ophthalmic conditions in a Labrador community. I. Refractive errors,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 440–448, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Y. Wong, P. J. Foster, G. J. Johnson, B. E. K. Klein, and S. K. L. Seah, “The relationship between ocular dimensions and refraction with adult stature: the tanjong pagar survey,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1237–1242, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. M. Teikari, “Myopia and stature,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 673–676, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Rosner, A. Laor, and M. Belkin, “Myopia and stature: findings in a population of 106,926 males,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. Nangia, J. B. Jonas, A. Matin, M. Kulkarni, A. Sinha, and R. Gupta, “Body height and ocular dimensions in the adult population in rural central india. The Central India Eye and Medical Study,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 248, no. 11, pp. 1657–1666, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. P. Osuobeni, I. Okpala, T. H. Williamson, and P. Thomas, “Height, weight, body mass index and ocular biometry in patients with sickle cell disease,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 189–198, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Grosvenor, “Changes with Refractive error with age,” in Primary Care Optometry, pp. 41–70, Butterworth-Heinemann, London, UK, 4th edition, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  11. H. W. Hofstetter, “Useful age-amplitude formula,” Optometry World, vol. 38, p. 42, 1950. View at Google Scholar
  12. E. V. Johansen, “Simple myopia in schoolboys in relation to body height and weight,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 355–361, 1950. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Dirani, A. Islam, and P. N. Baird, “Body stature and myopia—the genes in myopia (GEM) twin study,” Ophthalmic Epidemiology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 135–139, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. A. Gardiner, “The relation of myopia to growth,” The Lancet, vol. 263, no. 6810, pp. 476–479, 1954. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Gardiner, “Physical growth and the progress of myopia,” The Lancet, vol. 266, no. 6897, pp. 952–953, 1955. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. Goldschmidt, “Myopi and height,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 44, pp. 751–761, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  17. U. Krause, K. Krause, and P. Rantakallio, “Sex differences in refraction errors up to the age of 15,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 917–926, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. J. Gawron, “Differences among myopes, emmetropes, and hyperopes,” American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 753–760, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus