Table of Contents
ISRN Analytical Chemistry
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 308062, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/308062
Research Article

Evaluation of the Electrostatic Contribution to the Retention of Modified Nucleosides and Nucleobases by Zwitterionic Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography

Departamento de Química Analítica, Nutrición y Bromatología, Universidad de Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain

Received 20 December 2011; Accepted 10 January 2012

Academic Editors: T. Bolanca, A. M. Haji Shabani, and K. Ohyama

Copyright © 2012 Diego García-Gómez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. J. Alpert, “Hydrophilic-interaction chromatography for the separation of peptides, nucleic acids and other polar compounds,” Journal of Chromatography, vol. 499, pp. 177–196, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. D. V. McCalley, “Study of the selectivity, retention mechanisms and performance of alternative silica-based stationary phases for separation of ionised solutes in hydrophilic interaction chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1217, no. 20, pp. 3408–3417, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. S. Mysling, G. Palmisano, P. Hojrup, and M. Thaysen-Andersen, “Utilizing ion-pairing hydrophilic interaction chromatography solid phase extraction for efficient glycopeptide enrichment in glycoproteomics,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 82, no. 13, pp. 5598–5609, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Kumar, J. P. Hart, and D. V. McCalley, “Determination of catecholamines in urine using hydrophilic interaction chromatography with electrochemical detection,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1218, no. 25, pp. 3854–3861, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. J. Alpert, “Electrostatic repulsion hydrophilic interaction chromatography for isocratic separation of charged solutes and selective isolation of phosphopeptides,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 62–76, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. D. V. McCalley, “Is hydrophilic interaction chromatography with silica columns a viable alternative to reversed-phase liquid chromatography for the analysis of ionisable compounds?” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1171, no. 1-2, pp. 46–55, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Ruta, S. Rudaz, D. V. McCalley, J. L. Veuthey, and D. Guillarme, “A systematic investigation of the effect of sample diluent on peak shape in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1217, no. 52, pp. 8230–8240, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Guo and S. Gaiki, “Retention and selectivity of stationary phases for hydrophilic interaction chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1218, no. 35, pp. 5920–5938, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P. Jandera, “Stationary and mobile phases in hydrophilic interaction chromatography: a review,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 692, no. 1-2, pp. 1–25, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. Z. Hao, B. Xiao, and N. Weng, “Impact of column temperature and mobile phase components on selectivity of hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC),” Journal of Separation Science, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1449–1464, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. A. E. Karatapanis, Y. C. Fiamegos, and C. D. Stalikas, “A revisit to the retention mechanism of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography using model organic compounds,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1218, no. 20, pp. 2871–2879, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R.-I. Chirita, C. West, S. Zubrzycki, A. -L. Finaru, and C. Elfakir, “Investigations on the chromatographic behaviour of zwitterionic stationary phases used in hydrophilic interaction chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1218, no. 35, pp. 5939–5963, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. B. Buszewski and S. Noga, “Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)—a powerful separation technique,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 402, no. 1, pp. 231–247, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  14. K. Jinno, N. S. Quiming, N. L. Denola, and Y. Saito, “Modeling of retention of adrenoreceptor agonists and antagonists on polar stationary phases in hydrophilic interaction chromatography: a review,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 393, no. 1, pp. 137–153, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. E. Rodríguez-Gonzalo, D. García-Gómez, and R. Carabias-Martínez, “Study of retention behaviour and mass spectrometry compatibility in zwitterionic hydrophilic interaction chromatography for the separation of modified nucleosides and nucleobases,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1218, no. 26, pp. 3994–4001, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. Y. Guo and S. Gaiki, “Retention behavior of small polar compounds on polar stationary phases in hydrophilic interaction chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1074, no. 1-2, pp. 71–80, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus