Research Article

Performance of a Simplified Wall Motion Score Index Method for Noncardiologists to Assess Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Table 1

Percent concordance between RNA/BIP and participant estimates for each method and for each patient.

Type of observerBMA234CSig best
PatientVisualSQVisualSQBMA/234CMethod

Professional( 𝑁 = 1 6 )( 𝑁 = 1 6 )( 𝑁 = 1 6 )( 𝑁 = 1 6 )
Patient 1 ( E F = 1 8 % )100100100100NSNS
Patient 2 ( E F = 2 9 % )81.350.081.375.0NSNS
Patient 3 ( E F = 3 6 % )81.393.875.075.0NSNS
Patient 4 ( E F = 4 0 % )56.381.375.081.3NSNS
Patient 5 ( E F = 6 3 % )94.894.887.581.3NSNS
Patient 6 ( E F = 7 2 % )10010093.893.8NSNS

Novice( 𝑁 = 1 0 3 )( 𝑁 = 1 0 1 )( 𝑁 = 1 0 3 )( 𝑁 = 1 0 1 )
Patient 1 ( E F = 1 8 % )82.552.586.469.6234CVisual
Patient 2 ( E F = 2 9 % )20.44.093.360.2234CVisual
Patient 3 ( E F = 3 6 % )53.984.860.267.3NSSQ
Patient 4 ( E F = 4 0 % )65.786.363.175.2NSSQ
Patient 5 ( E F = 6 3 % )90.496.163.170.6BMANS
Patient 6 ( E F = 7 2 % )93.298.067.683.0BMASQ

Sig best: significant best method with a 𝑃 value ≤0.05; NS: nonsignificant.