Table of Contents
ISRN Education
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 424715, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/424715
Research Article

Keeping Our Nation's Mathematics Teachers

Mathematics Department, Fresno City College, 1101 East University Avenue, Fresno, CA 93741, USA

Received 21 October 2012; Accepted 8 November 2012

Academic Editors: M. F. Cerda and M. Reis

Copyright © 2012 Carol Curtis. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Levy, E. Fields, and E. Jablonski, “Overview of research: What we know and don’t know about the consequences of science and math teacher turnover,” Paper presented at the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future, Racine, Wis, USA, October 2006, http://ltd.edc.org/science.
  2. G. Hampden-Thompson, W. Herring, and G. Kienzi, Attrition of public school mathematics and science teachers. NCES Report No. 2008-77, 2008, http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/?ED501286.pdf.
  3. R. Ingersoll and D. Perda, The Mathematics and Science Teacher Shortage: Fact and Myth, Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2009.
  4. R. Ingersoll and L. Merrill, “Who’s teaching our children?” Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 14–20, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Ingersoll, Who Controls Teachers’ Work? Power and Accountability in America’s Schools, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006.
  6. J. Dewey, The Child and the Curriculum, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1974.
  7. E. Durkheim, Moral Education: A Study in the Theory and Application of the Sociology of Education, Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 1961.
  8. J. Meyer and W. Scott, Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif, USA, 1983.
  9. L. Darling-Hammond, “Inequality and the right to learn: access to qualified teachers in California's public schools,” Teachers College Record, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 1936–1966, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Cochran-Smith, “Inequality and the right to learn: access to qualified teachers in California’s public schools,” Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 367–392, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  11. L. Darling-Hammond, “We need to invest in math and science teachers,” Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 54, no. 17, p. 1, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. Ingersoll, Misdiagnosing the Teacher Quality Problem, The Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2007.
  13. K. Futernick, A Possible Dream: Retaining California Teachers so All Students Learn, California State University Press, Sacramento, Calif, USA, 2007.
  14. J. Marvel, D. Lyter, P. I. Peltola, G. Strizek, B. Morton, and R. Rowland, Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2004-2005 teacher follow-up survey, (NCES 2007-307), Washington, DC, USA, National Center for Education Statistics, 2006.
  15. C. M. Guarino, L. Santibañez, and G. A. Daley, “Teacher recruitment and retention: a review of the recent empirical literature,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 173–208, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. X. S. Liu, “The effect of teacher influence at school on first-year teacher attrition: a multilevel analysis of the Schools and Staffing Survey for 1999-2000,” Educational Research and Evaluation, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Center for Teaching Quality, “Understanding teacher working conditions: a review and look to the future,” 2008, http://www.teachingquality.org/pdfs/TWC2_Nov08.pdf.
  18. C. N. Tsouloupas, R. L. Carson, R. Matthews, M. J. Grawitch, and L. K. Barber, “Exploring the association between teachers' perceived student misbehaviour and emotional exhaustion: the importance of teacher efficacy beliefs and emotion regulation,” Educational Psychology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 173–189, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Kukla-Acevedo, “Leavers, movers, and stayers: the role of workplace conditions in teacher mobility decisions,” Journal of Educational Research, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 443–452, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Buchanan, “Where are they now? Ex-teachers tell their life-work stories,” Issues in Educational Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Hare and J. Heap, Effective Teacher Recruitment and Retention Strategies in the Midwest: Who is Making Use of Them?North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, Napierville, Canada, 2001.
  22. Charlotte Advocates for Education, “Role of principal leadership in increasing teacher retention. Creating a supportive environment,” 2004, http://sparkaction.org/node/26467.
  23. A. Miller, “Principal turnover, student achievement and teacher retention. (Unpublished master’s thesis),” Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2009.
  24. K. Brown and S. Wynn, “Finding, supporting, and keeping: the role of the principal in teacher retention issues,” Leadership and Policy in Schools, vol. 8, pp. 37–63, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  25. E. Denton, “Teachers’ perceptions of how leadership styles and practices of principals influence their job satisfaction and retention,” Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Education, vol. 70, no. 08, 3369249, 2009.
  26. National Center for Education Statistics, “Schools and staffing survey, 2007-2008,” 2008, http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass/pdf/0708/sass4a.pdf.
  27. United States Census Bureau, Census regions and divisions of the United States, 2010, http://www.census.gov/geo/www/us_regdiv.pdf.