Table of Contents
ISRN Civil Engineering
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 435618, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/435618
Research Article

Evaluating Variable Speed Limits and Dynamic Lane Merging Systems in Work Zones: A Simulation Study

1Planning Wing, National Highway Authority, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
2CATSS, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA

Received 29 February 2012; Accepted 1 May 2012

Academic Editors: P. J. S. Cruz and I. Raftoyiannis

Copyright © 2012 Zaier Zaidi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Tarko and S. Venugopal, “Safety and capacity evaluation of the Indiana lane merge system,” FHWA/IN/JTRP/-2000/19. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind, USA, 2001.
  2. A. G. Beacher, M. D. Fontaine, and N. J. Garber, “Evaluation of the late merge work zone traffic control strategy,” Tech. Rep. VTRC-05-R6, Virginia Transportation Council, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. Tarko, S. Kanipakapatman, and J. Wasson, “Modeling and optimization of the Indiana Lane merge control system on approaches to freeway work zones,” Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-97/12, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  4. P. T. McCoy, G. Pesti, and P. S. Byrd, “Alternative information to alleviate work zone related delays,” SPR-PL-1 SPR-PL-1(35) P513, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  5. “Dynamic Lane Merge Traffic Control System: A Strategy for Alleviating Aggressive Driving Behavior at Work Zones in Michigan,” Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wayne State University, 2001.
  6. P. T. McCoy and G. Pesti, “Dynamic late merge control concept for work zones on rural interstate highway,” in Proceedings of the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  7. Meyer, E. Construction Area Late Merge (CALM) System, “Midwest Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative,” 2004.
  8. “An Applied Technology and Traffic Analysis Program,” University of Maryland, 2006.
  9. URS, “Dynamic Late Merge System Evaluation: Initial Deployment on US-10,” Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2003.
  10. URS, “Evaluation of 2004 Dynamic Late Merge System,” Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2004.
  11. L. F. Grillo, T. K. Datta, and C. Hartner, “Evaluation of Dynamic late lane merge system at freeway construction zones,” in Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  12. K. P. Kang, G. L. Chang, N. Zou, and Transportation Research Record, “An optimal dynamic speed limit control for highway work-zone operations,” in Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2004.
  13. R. W. Lyles, W. C. Taylor, and D. Lavansiri, “A field test and evaluation of variable speed limits in work zones,” in Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2004.
  14. G. Pesti and P. T. McCoy, “Long-Term Effectiveness of Speed Monitoring Displays in Work Zones on Rural Interstate Highways,” Transportation Research Record 1754. Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  15. Florida Department of Transportation, “Plans Preparation Manual (Chapter 10. Work Zone Traffic Control),” 2008.
  16. VISSIM User Manual Version 4.30. P.T.V AG, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2007.
  17. R. Harb, E. Radwan, and M. Abdel-Aty, “Two simplified ITS-based lane management strategies for short term work zones,” Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 52–61, 2011. View at Google Scholar