Table of Contents
ISRN Education
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 456094, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/456094
Research Article

Scaffolding: Meaningful Sequences during the Training Phase of a Learning Potential Test?

1School of Education, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Handelskade 75, 7417 DH Deventer, The Netherlands
2Research Centre of Education, Faculty of Education, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 14007, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
3Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2, 9712 TC Groningen, The Netherlands

Received 21 December 2011; Accepted 19 February 2012

Academic Editor: Y. Xie

Copyright © 2012 Geerdina M. van der Aalsvoort et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. S. Lidz, Ed., Dynamic Assessment. An Interactional Approach to Evaluating Learning Potential, The Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA, 1987.
  2. L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1978, Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Soubermann.
  3. J. D. Day, J. L. Engelhardt, S. E. Maxwell, and E. E. Erika, “Comparison of static and dynamic assessment procedures and their relation to independent performance,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 358–368, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. S. Lidz and G. M. van der Aalsvoort, “Usefulness of the application of cognitive functions scales with young children from the Netherlands,” Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–44, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  5. W. C. M. Resing, “Understanding potential, about dynamic testing, variability in problem solving solutions and learning potential with children,” Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands, professorial speech, 2006.
  6. G. M. Van Der Aalsvoort and C. S. Lidz, “A cross-cultural validation study of the application of cognitive functions scale: a dynamic assessment procedure, with Dutch first grade students from regular primary schools,” Journal of Applied School Psychology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 91–108, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. S. Lidz and R. H. Jepsen, “The Application of Cognitive Function Scale (ACFS): an example of curriculum-based dynamic assessment,” in Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing Models en Applications, C. S. Lidz and J. G. Elliott, Eds., pp. 407–439, JAI/Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. Feuerstein, Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers, University Park Press, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1979.
  9. P. S. Klein and A. J. Tannenbaum, To Be Young and Gifted, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, USA, 1992.
  10. C. S. Lidz, Reaction to Mediation Scales, Personal correspondence with the author, 1997.
  11. C. S. Lidz and H. C. Haywood, Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and Educational Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007.
  12. D. Tzuriel, Dynamic Assessment of Young Children, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  13. P. van Geert, “Dynamische systeemtheorie van ontwikkeling, Mogelijke consequenties voor de benadering van de ontwikkeling van ‘afwijkende’ kinderen, diagnostiek, behandeling en evaluatie van interventies,” in De Ontwikkeling van Kinderen met Problemen: Gewoon Anders, E. J. Knorth, H. Nakken, C. E. Oenema-Mostert, A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars, and J. Strijker, Eds., pp. 28–43, Garant, Antwerp, Belgium, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  14. P. van Geert, “Play, an approach from the perspective of dynamic system theory,” University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2009.
  15. A. Ensing, G. M. van der Aalsvoort, and P. van Geert, “Dynamic patterns of teacher-child interaction and the way they provide insight in the learning potential of a five-year old child,” in Learning, Social Interaction and Diversity-Exploring Identities in School Practices, E. Hjörne, G. van der Aalsvoort, and G. de Abreu, Eds., pp. 163–175, Sense, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  16. P. van Geert and H. Steenbeek, “Explaining after by before: basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development,” Developmental Review, vol. 25, no. 3-4, pp. 408–442, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. W. Steenbeek and P. L. C. van Geert, “A theory and dynamic model of dyadic interaction: concerns, appraisals, and contagiousness in a developmental context,” Developmental Review, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–40, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. M. van der Aalsvoort, P. van Geert, and H. W. Steenbeek, “Microgenetic Methodology: possibilities with regard to research on learning and instruction,” in Investigating Classroom Interaction: Methodologies in Action, K. Kumpulainen, C. Hmelo-Silver, and M. César, Eds., pp. 203–227, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  19. D. K. Meyer and J. C. Turner, “Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Wood, J. S. Bruner, and G. Ross, “The role of tutoring in problem solving,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 17, pp. 89–100, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  21. I. Molenaar, C. A. M. Van Boxtel, and P. J. C. Sleegers, “The effects of scaffolding metacognitive activities in small groups,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1727–1738, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. V. D. Pol, M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen, “Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 46–57, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. S. Siegler and K. Crowley, “The microgenetic method: a direct means for studying cognitive development,” American Psychologist, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 606–620, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. S. Siegler and Z. Chen, “Developmental differences in rule learning: a microgenetic analysis,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 273–310, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. S. Lidz, Practitioner’s Guide to Dynamic Assessment, The Guilford Press, New York, NY ,USA, 1991.
  26. F. Hiddink, The relationship between parent-child interactions and learning gains with the subtest of Classification: validation of the ACFS, M.S. thesis, University of Groningen, Developmental Psychology, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2009.
  27. A. Ensing and E. B. Hensema, Categories, University of Groningen, Department of Developmental Psychology, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2008.
  28. F. van Loo and G. M. van der Aalsvoort, “Are effective dynamic interaction patterns related to learning gains?” in Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of EARLI SIG Social interaction in learning and instruction & SIG Learning and Teaching in Culturally Diverse Settings, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2010.
  29. F. van Loo and G. M. van der Aalsvoort, “Interaction patterns leading to learning gains: how to measure and how to interpret?” in Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of EARLI SIG Special Educational Needs, Frankfurt, Germany, 2010.
  30. J. Bos and H. W. Steenbeek, MediaCoder 2008, A Simple Application for Coding Behavior within Media Files. Dutch Manual, University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2008.
  31. J. Hattie and H. Timperley, “The power of feedback,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 81–112, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. E. Flynn and R. Siegler, “Measuring change: current trends and future directions in microgenetic research,” Infant and Child Development, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 135–149, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. M. Kennedy, “Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality,” Educational Researcher, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 591–598, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar