Table of Contents
ISRN Minimally Invasive Surgery
Volume 2012, Article ID 469013, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/469013
Clinical Study

Laparoscopic Intraoperative Cholangiography Interpretation by Surgeons versus Radiologists, A Comparative Study and Review of 200 Cholangiographies

1Department of General Surgery, Al Khor Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
2Department of Radiology, Al Khor Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
3Department of Geriatric Medicine, Al Amal Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
4Department of Tropical Medicine, Ain Shams University, Egypt
5Department of General Medicine, Al Khor Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar

Received 14 May 2012; Accepted 31 July 2012

Academic Editors: L. Boni, A. Dezawa, C.-G. Ker, and A. Umezawa

Copyright © 2012 Hany M. El-Hennawy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. T. Buddingh, V. B. Nieuwenhuijs, L. van Buuren, J. B. F. Hulscher, J. S. de Jong, and G. M. van Dam, “Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 25, pp. 2449–2461, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. L. Robinson, J. H. Donohue, S. Gunes et al., “Selective operative cholangiography: appropriate management for laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 625–631, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. D. Kondylis, D. R. Simmons, S. K. Agarwal, K. A. Ciardiello, and R. B. Reinhold, “Abnormal intraoperative cholangiography: treatment options and long- term follow-up,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 347–350, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Y. Azary, H. Kalbasi, A. Setayesh et al., “Predictive value and main determinants of abnormal features of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy,” Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases International, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 308–312, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. T. Buddingh, A. N. Morks, H. O. ten Cate Hoedemaker et al., “Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 26, pp. 79–85, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. R. Fletcher, M. S. T. Hobbs, P. Tan et al., “Complications of cholecystectomy: Risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 229, no. 4, pp. 449–457, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. W. Way, L. Stewart, W. Gantert et al., “Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 237, no. 4, pp. 460–469, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. S. Woods, L. W. Traverso, R. A. Kozarek et al., “Biliary tract complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are detected more frequently with routine intraoperative cholangiography,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1076–1080, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. S. Barkun, G. M. Fried, A. N. Barkun et al., “Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography: Implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 218, no. 3, pp. 371–379, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. W. Pace, J. Cosgrove, B. Breuer, and I. B. Margolis, “Intraoperative cholangiography revisited,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 448–450, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. Kharbutli and V. Velanovich, “Management of preoperatively suspected choledocholithiasis: a decision analysis,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1973–1980, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Horwood, F. Akbar, D. Katherine, and R. Morgan, “Prospective evaluation of a selective approach to cholangiography for suspected common bile duct stones,” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 206–210, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. U. Haglund, “Bile duct injuries - X-ray reduces the risk, but gives no guarantee. Unconsciously wrong interpretation is avoided if two experts make the evaluation,” Lakartidningen, vol. 100, no. 48, pp. 3973–3975, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. P. Spinn, D. S. Wolf, D. Verma, and F. J. Lukens, “Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1479–1484, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus