Table of Contents
ISRN Rehabilitation
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 490950, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/490950
Research Article

Looking into Task-Specific Activation Using a Prosthesis Substituting Vision with Audition

1Neural Rehabilitation Group, Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 54, UCL B1.54.09, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
2Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium

Received 26 August 2011; Accepted 25 October 2011

Academic Editors: G. Kerkhoff and C. I. Renner

Copyright © 2012 Paula Plaza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. M. Zeki, “Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey,” Nature, vol. 274, no. 5670, pp. 423–428, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. G. Ungerleider and M. Mishkin, “Two cortical visual systems,” in Analysis of Visual Behavior, D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, and R. J. W. Mansfield, Eds., pp. 549–586, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. V. Haxby, C. L. Grady, B. Horwitz et al., “Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1621–1625, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. A. Goodale and A. D. Milner, “Separate visual pathways for perception and action,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Arno, A. G. De Volder, A. Vanlierde et al., “Occipital activation by pattern recognition in the early blind using auditory substitution for vision,” NeuroImage, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 632–645, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Renier, O. Collignon, C. Poirier et al., “Cross-modal activation of visual cortex during depth perception using auditory substitution of vision,” NeuroImage, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 573–580, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Ptito, S. M. Moesgaard, A. Gjedde, and R. Kupers, “Cross-modal plasticity revealed by electrotactile stimulation of the tongue in the congenitally blind,” Brain, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 606–614, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Poirier, A. De Volder, D. Tranduy, and C. Scheiber, “Pattern recognition using a device substituting audition for vision in blindfolded sighted subjects,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1108–1121, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Amedi, W. M. Stern, J. A. Camprodon et al., “Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 687–689, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. Striem-Amit, O. Dakwar, L. Reich, and A. Amedi, “The large-scale organization of “visual” streams emerges without visual experience,” Cerebal Cortex. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. I. Matteau, R. Kupers, E. Ricciardi, P. Pietrini, and M. Ptito, “Beyond visual, aural and haptic movement perception: hMT+ is activated by electrotactile motion stimulation of the tongue in sighted and in congenitally blind individuals,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 82, no. 5-6, pp. 264–270, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Renier and A. G. De Volder, “Cognitive and brain mechanisms in sensory substitution of vision: a contribution to the study of human perception,” Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 489–503, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Poirier, A. G. De Volder, and C. Scheiber, “What neuroimaging tells us about sensory substitution,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1064–1070, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. W. James, G. K. Humphrey, J. S. Gati, R. S. Menon, and M. A. Goodale, “Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams,” Neuron, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 793–801, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. F. Valyear, J. C. Culham, N. Sharif, D. Westwood, and M. A. Goodale, “A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: a human fMRI study,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 218–228, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Sathian and A. Zangaladze, “Feeling with the mind's eye: contribution of visual cortex to tactile perception,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 135, no. 1-2, pp. 127–132, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. I. Gauthier, W. G. Hayward, M. J. Tarr, A. W. Anderson, P. Skudlarski, and J. C. Gore, “BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition,” Neuron, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 161–171, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Eger, J. Ashburner, J. D. Haynes, R. J. Dolan, and G. Rees, “fMRI activity patterns in human LOC carry information about object exemplars within category,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 356–370, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. Pourtois, S. Schwartz, M. Spiridon, R. Martuzzi, and P. Vuilleumier, “Object representations for multiple visual categories overlap in lateral occipital and medial fusiform cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1806–1819, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. I. Faillenot, S. Sunaert, P. van Hecke, and G. A. Orban, “Orientation discrimination of objects and gratings compared: an fMRI study,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 585–596, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Talairach and P. Tournoux, Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain, Thieme Medical, New York, NY, USA, 1988.
  22. C. Capelle, C. Trullemans, P. Arno, and C. Veraart, “A real-time experimental prototype for enhancement of vision rehabilitation using auditory substitution,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1279–1293, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Arno, C. Capelle, M. C. Wanet-Defalque, M. Catalan-Ahumada, and C. Veraart, “Auditory coding of visual patterns for the blind,” Perception, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1013–1029, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Renier, C. Laloyaux, O. Collignon et al., “The Ponzo illusion with auditory substitution of vision in sighted and early-blind subjects,” Perception, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 857–867, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Renier, R. Bruyer, and A. G. De Volder, “Vertical-horizontal illusion present for sighted but not early blind humans using auditory substitution of vision,” Perception and Psychophysics, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 535–542, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Renier and A. G. De Volder, “Vision substitution and depth perception: early blind subjects experience visual perspective through their ears,” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 175–183, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. K. J. Friston, A. P. Holmes, K. J. Worsley, J. P. Poline, C. D. Frith, and R. S. J. Frackowiak, “Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 189–210, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. C. Prather, J. R. Votaw, and K. Sathian, “Task-specific recruitment of dorsal and ventral visual areas during tactile perception,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1079–1087, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. W. van Boven, J. E. Ingeholm, M. S. Beauchamp, P. C. Bikle, and L. G. Ungerleider, “Tactile form and location processing in the human brain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 35, pp. 12601–12605, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Zhang, E. Mariola, R. Stilla et al., “Tactile discrimination of grating orientation: fMRI activation patterns,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 370–377, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. C. Roth and J. B. Hellige, “Spatial processing and hemispheric asymmetry: contributions of the transient/magnocellular visual system,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 472–484, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. Jager and A. Postma, “On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a review of the current evidence,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 504–515, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. O. Bushara, R. A. Weeks, K. Ishii et al., “Modality-specific frontal and parietal areas for auditory and visual spatial localization in humans,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 759–766, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. P. Rauschecker and B. Tian, “Mechanisms and streams for processing of “what” and “where” in auditory cortex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 22, pp. 11800–11806, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. Alain, S. R. Arnott, S. Hevenor, S. Graham, and C. L. Grady, ““What” and “where” in the human auditory system,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 21, pp. 12301–12306, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. L. Reed, R. L. Klatzky, and E. Halgren, “What vs. where in touch: an fMRI study,” NeuroImage, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 718–726, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. A. Renier, I. Anurova, A. G. De Volder, S. Carlson, J. VanMeter, and J. P. Rauschecker, “Multisensory integration of sounds and vibrotactile stimuli in processing streams for “what” and “where”,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 35, pp. 10950–10960, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Stricanne, R. A. Andersen, and P. Mazzoni, “Eye-centered, head-centered, and intermediate coding of remembered sound locations in area LIP,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 2071–2076, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. C. Culham and N. G. Kanwisher, “Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 157–163, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. E. Ricciardi, D. Bonino, C. Gentili, L. Sani, P. Pietrini, and T. Vecchi, “Neural correlates of spatial working memory in humans: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study comparing visual and tactile processes,” Neuroscience, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 339–349, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. Alain, Y. He, and C. Grady, “The contribution of the inferior parietal lobe to auditory spatial working memory,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 285–295, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. A. Weeks, A. Aziz-Sultan, K. O. Bushara et al., “A PET study of human auditory spatial processing,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 262, no. 3, pp. 155–158, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. P. Maeder, R. A. Meuli, M. Adriani et al., “Distinct pathways involved in sound recognition and localization: a human fMRI study,” NeuroImage, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 802–816, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Clarke, A. B. Thiran, P. Maeder et al., “What and where in human audition: selective deficits following focal hemispheric lesions,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R. J. Zatorre, M. Bouffard, P. Ahad, and P. Belin, “Where is 'where' in the human auditory cortex?” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 905–909, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S. R. Arnott, M. A. Binns, C. L. Grady, and C. Alain, “Assessing the auditory dual-pathway model in humans,” NeuroImage, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 401–408, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. F. Gougoux, R. J. Zatorre, M. Lassonde, P. Voss, and F. Lepore, “A functional neuroimaging study of sound localization: visual cortex activity predicts performance in early-blind individuals,” PLoS Biology, vol. 3, no. 2, article e27, pp. 0324–0333, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. C. F. Altmann, C. Bledowski, M. Wibral, and J. Kaiser, “Processing of location and pattern changes of natural sounds in the human auditory cortex,” NeuroImage, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1192–1200, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. C. F. Altmann, M. Henning, M. K. Döring, and J. Kaiser, “Effects of feature-selective attention on auditory pattern and location processing,” NeuroImage, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 69–79, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Lewald, K. A. J. Riederer, T. Lentz, and I. G. Meister, “Processing of sound location in human cortex,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1261–1270, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. R. Malach, J. B. Reppas, R. R. Benson et al., “Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 18, pp. 8135–8139, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. K. Grill-Spector, T. Kushnir, T. Hendler, S. Edelman, Y. Itzchak, and R. Malach, “A sequence of object-processing stages revealed by fMRI in the human occipital lobe,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 316–328, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. Z. Kourtzi and N. Kanwisher, “Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 3310–3318, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. Amedi, R. Malach, T. Hendler, S. Peled, and E. Zohary, “Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 324–330, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. Amedi, G. Jacobson, T. Hendler, R. Malach, and E. Zohary, “Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1202–1212, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. R. Kupers, D. R. Chebat, K. H. Madsen, O. B. Paulson, and M. Ptito, “Neural correlates of virtual route recognition in congenital blindness,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 28, pp. 12716–12721, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. Vanlierde, A. G. De Volder, M. C. Wanet-Defalque, and C. Veraart, “Occipito-parietal cortex activation during visuo-spatial imagery in early blind humans,” NeuroImage, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 698–709, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. Zhang, V. D. Weisser, R. Stilla, S. C. Prather, and K. Sathian, “Multisensory cortical processing of object shape and its relation to mental imagery,” Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 251–259, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. T. Sack, C. Jacobs, F. de Martino, N. Staeren, R. Goebel, and E. Formisano, “Dynamic premotor-to-parietal interactions during spatial imagery,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 34, pp. 8417–8429, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. H. D. Zimmer, “Visual and spatial working memory: from boxes to networks,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1373–1395, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus