Table of Contents
ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 496935, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/496935
Clinical Study

Routine Use of Color Doppler in Fetal Heart Scanning in a Low-Risk Population

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
2Department of Pediatrics, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
3Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway

Received 14 February 2012; Accepted 19 March 2012

Academic Editors: K. Chan and E. Cosmi

Copyright © 2012 Torbjørn Moe Eggebø et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Dolk, M. Loane, and E. Garne, “Congenital heart defects in Europe: prevalence and perinatal mortality, 2000 to 2005,” Circulation, vol. 123, no. 8, pp. 841–849, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. Allan, B. Benacerraf, J. A. Copel et al., “Isolated major congenital heart disease,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 370–379, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Blyth, D. Howe, J. Gnanapragasam, and D. Wellesley, “The hidden mortality of transposition of the great arteries and survival advantage provided by prenatal diagnosis,” International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 115, no. 9, pp. 1096–1100, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. A. Copel, A. S. A. Tan, and C. S. Kleinman, “Does a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease alter short-term outcome?” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 237–241, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Sharland, “Fetal cardiac screening: why bother?” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. F64–F68, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. S. Carvalho, E. Mavrides, E. A. Shinebourne, S. Campbell, and B. Thilaganathan, “Improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening for major congenital heart defects,” Heart, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 387–391, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Chaoui, “The four-chamber view: four reasons why it seems to fail in screening for cardiac abnormalities and suggestions to improve detection rate,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Acharya, V. Sitras, J. M. Maltau et al., “Major congenital heart disease in Northern Norway: shortcomings of pre- and postnatal diagnosis,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 83, no. 12, pp. 1124–1129, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  9. E. Tegnander, W. Williams, O. J. Johansens, H. G. K. Blaas, and S. H. Eik-Nes, “Prenatal detection of heart defects in a non-selected population of 30149 fetuses-detection rates and outcome,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 252–265, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Westin, S. Saltvedt, G. Bergman et al., “Routine ultrasound examination at 12 or 18 gestational weeks for prenatal detection of major congenital heart malformations? A randomised controlled trial comprising 36 299 fetuses,” International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 675–682, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Galindo, I. Herraiz, D. Escribano, D. Lora, J. C. Melchor, and J. De La Cruz, “Prenatal detection of congenital heart defects: a survey on clinical practice in Spain,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 287–295, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Tegnander and S. H. Eik-Nes, “The examiner's ultrasound experience has a significant impact on the detection rate of congenital heart defects at the second-trimester fetal examination,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 8–14, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. McBrien, A. Sands, B. Craig, J. Dornan, and F. Casey, “Impact of a regional training program in fetal echocardiography for sonographers on the antenatal detection of major congenital heart disease,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 279–284, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Chew, S. Stone, S. M. Donath, and D. J. Penny, “Impact of antenatal screening on the presentation of infants with congenital heart disease to a cardiology unit,” Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 704–708, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. L. Simpson, “Screening for congenital heart disease,” Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. Lee, L. Allan, J. S. Carvalho et al., “ISUOG consensus statement: what constitutes a fetal echocardiogram?” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 239–242, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Chaoui and R. McEwing, “Three cross-sectional planes for fetal color Doppler echocardiography,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 81–93, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, “Cardiac screening examination of the fetus: guidelines for performing the “basic” and “extended basic” cardiac scan,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 107–113, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  19. Fetal Echocardiography Task Force, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Clinical Standards Committee, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, “AIUM practice guideline for the performance of fetal echocardiography,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 127–136, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. Salvesen, C. Lees, J. Abramowicz, C. Brezinka, G. Ter Haar, and K. Marsal, “ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler in the 11 to 13 +6-week fetal ultrasound examination,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 37, no. 6, p. 628, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Yagel, R. Arbel, E. Y. Anteby, D. Raveh, and R. Achiron, “The three vessels and trachea view (3VT) in fetal cardiac scanning,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 340–345, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. Tegnander, S. H. Eik-Nes, and D. T. Linker, “Incorporating the four-chamber view of the fetal heart into the second-trimester routine fetal examination,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 24–28, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  23. A. Del Bianco, S. Russo, N. Lacerenza et al., “Four chamber view plus three-vessel and trachea view for a complete evaluation of the fetal heart during the second trimester,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 309–312, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. J. Yoo, Y. H. Lee, E. S. Kim et al., “Three-vessel view of the fetal upper mediastinum: an easy means of detecting abnormalities of the ventricular outflow tracts and great arteries during obstetric screening,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 173–182, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Vinals, F. Heredia, and A. Giuliano, “The role of the three vessels and trachea view (3 VT) in the diagnosis of congenital heart defects,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 358–367, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  26. L. Allan, “Fetal cardiac scanning today,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 639–643, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Wren, Z. Reinhardt, and K. Khawaja, “Twenty-year trends in diagnosis of life-threatening neonatal cardiovascular malformations,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. F33–F35, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus