Table of Contents
ISRN Civil Engineering
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 507269, 18 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/507269
Research Article

Comparing Three Lane Merging Schemes for Short-Term Work Zones: A Simulation Study

1CATSS, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
2CATSS, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
3Gulf Coast Research Center for Evacuation and Transportation Resiliency, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA

Received 23 August 2011; Accepted 27 September 2011

Academic Editors: J. D. Nelson and I. G. Raftoyiannis

Copyright © 2012 Rami Harb et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Tarko and S. Venugopal, “Safety and capacity evaluation of the Indiana lane merge system,” Tech. Rep. FHWA/IN/JTRP/-2000/19, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. G. Beacher, M. D. Fontaine, and N. J. Garber, “Evaluation of the Late Merge Work Zone Traffic Control Strategy,” Report VTRC-05-R6, Virginia Transportation Council, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. Tarko, S. Kanipakapatman, and J. Wasson, “Modeling and optimization of the Indiana lane merge control system on approaches to freeway work zones,” Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-97/12, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  4. P. T. McCoy, G. Pesti, and P. S. Byrd, “Alternative information to alleviate work zone related delays,” SPR-PL-1(35) P513, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  5. Wayne State University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, “Dynamic Lane Merge Traffic Control System: A Strategy for Alleviating Aggressive Driving Behavior at Work Zones in Michigan,” 2001.
  6. P. T. McCoy and G. Pesti, “Dynamic late merge control concept for work zones on rural interstate highway,” in Proceedings of the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
  7. E. Meyer, “Midwest Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative,” Construction Area Late Merge (CALM) System, 2004, http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/9000/9500/9529/Meyer1.pdf.
  8. URS, “Dynamic Late Merge System Evaluation: Initial Deployment on US-10,” Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2003.
  9. URS, “Evaluation of 2004 Dynamic Late Merge System,” Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2004.
  10. L. F. Grillo, T. K. Datta, and C. Hartner, “Evaluation of the dynamic late lane merge system at freeway construction zones,” in Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  11. “Florida Department of Transportation. Plans Preparation Manual (Chapter 10. Work Zone Traffic Control),” 2008, http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/2012/Volume2/2012Volume2.pdf.
  12. R. Harb, E. Radwan, S. Ramasamy, M. Abdel-Aty, and S. Putcha, “Two simplified ITS-based Lane Management strategies for Short term work zones,” in Proceedings of the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
  13. VISSIM User Manual, “Version 4.30. P. T. V. AG,” Karlsruhe, Germany, 2007.
  14. Traffic Analysis Toolbox, “Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software,” Federal Highway Administration United States Department of Transportation, Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. McLean, Va, USA, 2004.
  15. I. Chatterjee, E. Praveen, M. Sandeep, and S. Carlos, “Replication of work zone capacity values in a simulation model,” in Proceedings of the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.