Research Article
Growth and Nutrient Uptake Responses of Kinnow to Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizae
Table 5
Influence of different AMF treatments on foliar concentration of micronutrients in Kinnow.
| | Treatment | Zinc | Manganese | Iron | Copper | | (μg/g dw) | | First year | Second year | First year | Second year | First year | Second year | First year | Second year |
| | T0 | 57.65 | 75.85 | 166.3 | 164.2 | 47.30 | 75.07 | 13.63 | 22.51 | | T1 | 71.10 | 97.05 | 173.8 | 197.9 | 123.3 | 154.2 | 12.11 | 21.85 | | T2 | 65.90 | 86.23 | 112.8 | 184.4 | 74.55 | 85.77 | 12.80 | 29.68 | | T3 | 69.40 | 78.92 | 166.3 | 203.9 | 72.70 | 88.15 | 13.35 | 26.55 | | T4 | 66.60 | 83.08 | 196.8 | 231.1 | 51.25 | 74.36 | 13.35 | 26.55 | | LSD (0.05) | 18.79 | 55.47 | 31.14 | 6.31 |
|
|
T0: control (non-AMF); T1: Glomus manihotis; T2: Gigaspora gigantia; T3: Glomus mosseae; T4: T1 + T2 + T3.
|
