Management of Type 3 Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Comparison of Long-Term Functional Results of Two Operative Methods

Table 1

Group 1 (modified WD procedure).

Age	Sex	Occupation	Mechanism of injury	Injured side	Interval b/w injury and surgery (months)	Complications	Total duration of followup (years)	Oxford shoulder score	Strength	Appearance	Return to preinjury level of activity
28	M	Engineer	Rugby	Dominant	18	Nil	6.5	57	Full	Satisfactory	Yes
35	M	Building site manager	RTA	Dominant	2	Rolled out of bed 6 weeks postop.? rupture	6	50	Full	Not satisfactory	Yes
39	F	Home care assistant	Fall	Dominant	3	Nil	5	60	Full	Satisfactory	Yes
35	M	Mechanic	Motor Cross Racing	Dominant	5	Nil	6.3	60	Full	Satisfactory	Yes
59	F	House wife	Fall	Non-dominant	5	Nil	6	56	Full	Satisfactory	Yes
43	M	Landscape gardener	Fall	Non-dominant	16	Shoulder pain 8 months postop.	5.6	58	Full	Satisfactory	Yes
22	M	Police officer	Rugby	Non-dominant	18	Nil	6.6	58	Yes	Satisfactory	Yes
16	F	Student	Fall	Non-dominant	24	Nil	6.6	58	Full	Satisfactory	Yes
18	M	Student	Fall	Dominant	24	Nil	6.6	58	Full	Satisfactory	Yes
31	M	Welder	Fall	Dominant	48	Nil	6.6	58	Full	Satisfactory	Yes
23	M	Student	Fall	Dominant	120	Nil	6.6	58	Full	Satisfactory	Yes