International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 591953 |

Kamiar Zomorodian, Mohammad Jamal Saharkhiz, Samaneh Shariati, Keyvan Pakshir, Mohammad Javad Rahimi, Reza Khashei, "Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activities of Essential Oils from Nepeta cataria L. against Common Causes of Food-Borne Infections", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2012, Article ID 591953, 6 pages, 2012.

Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activities of Essential Oils from Nepeta cataria L. against Common Causes of Food-Borne Infections

Academic Editor: S. Raic-Malic
Received27 Mar 2012
Accepted22 Apr 2012
Published17 Jun 2012


Nepeta cataria L. is traditionally consumed as a food additive. The effects of three different harvest stages of N. cataria essential oils (EOs) against most common causes of food-borne infections were evaluated by broth microdilution method as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The chemical composition of the EOs from N. cataria has been analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The analysis of the EOs indicated that 4a-α,7-α,7a-β-nepetalactone (55–58%) and 4a-α,7-β,7a-α-nepetalactone (30–31.2%) were the major compounds of the EOs at all developmental stages. The results showed that the tested EOs exhibited antimicrobial activities against the food-borne pathogens at concentrations of 0.125–2 μL/mL. Based on these results, the EO of N. cataria can possibly be used in food products as a natural preservative agent.

1. Introduction

For thousands of years, aromatic plants have been used for flavoring and medicinal properties [1, 2]. These plants represent a renewable source of flavoring substances and are commonly used in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical products [3, 4]. It has been shown that many of these plants and their aromatic products have potential antimicrobial activities [58]. In tropical climates where these food-borne infections are common, they are traditionally used in food stuff for their preservative properties [3, 4]. In the recent decades, there is a great tendency towards using natural products and phytochemicals in medicine and food industries to overcome antibiotic resistance and increase the shelf life of products [8].

The family Nepeta (Lamiaceae) with the common Persian name “puneh” includes a large number of volatile oil plants that are wildly distributed in Europe, Asia, North America, and the mountains of tropical Africa [9]. About 67 species of this family are grown endemically in Iran. Nepeta cataria (Catnip), a tropical aromatic plant belonging to this family, is native to Asia and Southeast Europe. Its leaves resemblemintin appearance and the flowers are white and finely spotted with purple with a strong odor [10]. In Iran and some other countries, fresh or dried leaves and flowers of N. cataria are used in making sauces, soups, and cheese [11].

In folk medicine, this plant has been used for antispasmodic, carminative, stimulant, and tonic properties [1114]. Moreover, traditionally, the tea made of its leaves is known as sedative and soporific and also is used to relive gastrointestinal and respiratory disorders such as colic, diarrhea, cough, asthma, and bronchitis [11, 12, 14]. It has been shown that many medical properties of Nepeta species are the characteristic of its essential oil (EO) and flavonoids. The EOs of N. cataria are rich in nepetalactones [1520] and have been reported to have antibacterial [15, 17, 19], antifungal [15, 19], insecticidal [21, 22] and antioxidant activities [15]. It has also been shown that the extract of N. cateria has an inhibitory activity on growth, enzyme production and adhesion of some bacteria [15, 23].

EOs, especially with known antibacterial effects, have the potential to be used in food industry as a preservative, for prevention of spoilage and to increase the shelf life of products [8, 24]. To the best of our knowledge, only a few published reports are available regarding the antimicrobial effects of the N. cataria EOs, especially against food-borne and resistant microorganisms. In the present study, the chemical constituents of three different phenological stages (vegetative, floral budding and full flowering) of N. cataria were studied and their components were compared with each other and with the previously reported data. In addition, the antimicrobial effects of these EOs were evaluated against the common causes of food-borne infections.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

This study was carried out in the research field station of the Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Iran. The station is located 1810 m above the mean sea level, with the latitude of 29°36′ north and altitude of 52°32′ east. The minimum and maximum temperatures of the field in the recent ten years were −10°C and 38°C, respectively. The daily climatic data during this study were obtained from the agro-meteorological station of Irrigation Department located in a state farm about 500 m far from the experimental site. Catnip seeds (obtained from Medicinal Plants and Drugs Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Iran) were sown in January 2010 in a sandy-loam textured soil with pH = 7.5, EC = 1.8 dS m−1, 0.97% organic matter, 0.094% N, 24 ppm P, 250 ppm K, 4.5 ppm Fe, 0.42 ppm Zn, 20 ppm Mn, and 0.94 ppm Cu. The plant samples were harvested at vegetative, floral budding, and full flowering stages. The plant species was identified and authenticated by A. R. Khosravi, a plant taxonomist, at Shiraz University, Herbarium, Shiraz, Iran. Voucher specimen (no. 24995) has been deposited in the herbarium.

2.2. Essential Oil Extraction

The aerial parts of the plants were harvested at vegetative, floral budding, and full flowering stages, and then air dried. The samples (30 g, three replicates for each stage) were hydro-distillated for 3 hr using an all glass Clevenger-type apparatus, to extract EOs, according to the method recommended by the European Pharmacopoeia [25]. The extracted EO samples were dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and stored in sealed vials at low temperature (4°C) before gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography/mass spectrometric (GC/MS) analysis.

2.3. GC and GC/MS Analysis

The analysis of EOs was carried out using a Thermoquest-Finnigan Trace GC-MS instrument equipped with a DB-5 fused silica capillary column ( 6 0 m × 0 . 2 5 m m i.d., film thickness 0.25 mm). The oven temperature was programmed to increase from 60 to 250°C at a rate of 4°C min−1 and finally held for 10 min; transfer line temperature was 250°C. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.1 mL min−1 with a split ratio equal to 1/50. The quadrupole mass spectrometer was scanned over the 35–465 amu with an ionizing voltage of 70 eV and an ionization current of 150 mA.

2.4. Chromatography Flame Ionisation Detector (GC/FID) Analyses

The GC/FID analysis of the oils was conducted using a Thermoquest-Finnigan instrument equipped with a DB-5 fused silica column ( 6 0 m × 0 . 2 5 m m i.d., film thickness 0.25 mm). Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas at the constant flow rate of 1.1 mL min−1; the split ratio was the same as that used for GC/MS. The oven temperature was raised from 60 to 250°C at a rate of 4°C min−1 and held for 10 min. The injector and detector (FID) temperatures were kept at 250 and 280°C, respectively. Semiquantitative data were obtained from FID area percentages without the use of correction factors.

2.5. Identification of Essential Oil Components

Retention indices (RI) were calculated using retention times of n-alkanes (C6–C24) that were injected after the oil at the same temperature and conditions. The compounds were identified by comparison of their RI with those reported in the literature, and their mass spectrum was compared with the Wiley Library [26].

2.6. Determination of Antimicrobial Activities
2.6.1. Microorganisms

The antimicrobial activities of the EOs against food-borne pathogens including standard species of S. aureus (ATCC 29213 and ATCC 700698), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (ATCC 43894), Shigella flexneri (NCTC 8516), Bacillus cereus (ATCC 11778), P. aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), Aspergillus flavus (ATCC 64025), A. fumigates (ATCC 14110 and CBS 144.89), A. clavatus (CBS 514.65), A. orizae (CBS 818.72), and clinical isolates of S. aureus, E. coli, Shigella spp, Salmonella spp, Listeria monocytogenes and P. aeruginosa collected from Dr. Faghihi Hospital (Shiraz, Iran) were determined in this study. The susceptibility of all clinical isolates of bacteria and fungi against selected antibiotics was examined by microdilution and disk diffusion methods [2729].

2.6.2. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

MICs were determined using broth microdilution method recommended by the CLSI with some modifications [28, 29]. Briefly, for determination of antifungal activities against filamentous fungi, serial dilutions of the EOs (0.031 to 16.0  𝜇 L/ml) were prepared in 96-well microtitre plates using RPMI-1640 media (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) buffered with MOPS (Sigma, St. Louis, USA). To determine the antibacterial activities, serial dilutions of the EOs (0.125 to 128.0  𝜇 L/ml) were prepared in Muller-Hinton Broth media (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Test fungi or bacteria strains were suspended in the media and the cell densities were adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standards at 530 nm wavelength using a spectrophotometric method (this yields stock suspension of 1–5 × 106 cells/mL for fungi and 1–1.5 × 108 cells/mL for bacteria). 0.1 mL of the working inoculums was added to the microtiter plates, which were incubated in a humid atmosphere at 30°C for 24–48 h (fungi) or at 37°C for 24 h (bacteria). 200 μL of the uninoculated medium was included as a sterility control (blank). In addition, growth controls (medium with inoculums but without essential oil) were also included. The growth in each well was compared with that of the growth control well. MICs were visually determined and defined as the lowest concentration of the essential oil produced no visible growth. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. In addition, media from wells with fungi showing no visible growth were further cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and from wells with bacteria showing no visible growth on Muller-Hinton agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to determine the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). MBCs and MFCs were determined as the lowest concentration yielding no more than 4 colonies, which corresponds to a mortality of 99.9% of the microbes in the initial inoculums.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Results

The hydrodistillation of 30 g of the aerial parts of N. cataria at the vegetative, floral budding, and full flowering stages yielded 0.3, 0.5, and 0.9% (w/w) essential oil, respectively. The composition of EOs at different growth stages is shown in Table 1 in the order of their elution from a DB-5 column. A total of 13, 12, and 14 compounds representing 93.6, 99.6, and 99% of the total were detected at vegetative, floral budding, and full flowering stages, respectively. The nepetalactones including 4a-α,7-α,7a-β-nepetalactone (55–58%) and 4a-α,7-β,7a-α-nepetalactone (30–31.2%) were the major oil constituents of all growth stages. The highest amount of components such as α-pinene (4.6%), β-pinene (1.64%), and 4a-α,7-β,7a-α-nepetalactone (31.2%) were detected at full flowering stage.

ComponentRIaVegetative (%)Floral budding (%)Full flowering (%)

1-Cyclohexen-1-yl-methyl ketone9800.50.60.7
trans Caryophyllene14301.12.72.1
Caryophyllene oxide15690.50.20.12

aRetention index.

The antibacterial activities of the EOs of N. cataria against the common causes of food-borne infections are shown in Table 2. The EOs inhibited the growth of all Gram-positive food-borne bacteria at concentrations of 0.125–1  𝜇 L/mL. Furthermore, the EOs exhibited the bactericidal activity (MBC) for all of the above-mentioned Gram-positive bacteria at concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 8  𝜇 L/mL. All of the Gram-negative bacteria were susceptible to the Catnip oils at concentrations of 0.25–32  𝜇 L/mL. The essence of N. cataria at different growth stages exhibited bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities against the Shigella and Salmonella species at concentrations of 0.25–2  𝜇 L/mL and 0.5–8  𝜇 L/mL, respectively. Moreover, the EOs inhibited the growth of the standard species of Aspergillus at concentration of 0.25–1  𝜇 L/mL.

Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3
Bacteria (number of strains)MICa ( 𝜇 L/mL)MMCb ( 𝜇 L/mL)MICa ( 𝜇 L/mL)MMCb ( 𝜇 L/mL)MICa ( 𝜇 L/mL)MICb ( 𝜇 L/mL)
GMc (range)GMc (range)GMc (range)GMc (range)GMc (range)GMc (range)

BacteriaMethicillin resistant S. aureus (6)0.22 (0.125–0.5)1.12 (1-2)0.17 (0.125–0.5)1.41 (1-2)0.28 (0.25–0.5)1.41 (1-2)
Methicillin sensitive S. aureus (6)0.19 (0.125–0.5)0.89 (0.5–2)0.15 (0.125–0.25)1.26 (1-2)0.22 (0.125–0.5)1.41 (1–4)
B. cereus ATCC 1177812110.51
L. monocytogenes 141818
Third generation cephalosporins resistance E. coli (5)3.48 (2–4)6.96 (4–8)3.48 (2–4)6.96 (4–8)3.03 (2–4)5.65 (2–8)
Third generation cephalosporins sensitive E. coli (6)4 (2–8)8.98 (4–16)3.56 (2–8)8.98 (4–16)3.17 (2–4)6.35 (2–8)
Enterohemorrhagic E. coli ATCC 43894121211
S. flexneri NCTC 85160.520.520.52
S. dysentery (4)0.5 (0.25–2)2 (1–4)0.5 (0.25–2)1.68 (1-2)0.42 (0.25–2)1 (0.5–2)
S. sonnei 281212
S. enterica serovarparatyphi A242412
S. enterica serovarparatyphi B242412

FungiA. flavusATCC 640250.510.510.51
A. fumigatus ATCC 141100.510.510.51
A. fumigatus CBS 144.890.510.510.51
A. clavatus CBS 514.650.510.510.251
A. orizae CBS 818.720.510.510.51

a Minimum inhibitory concentration, bMinimum microbicidal concentration, cGeometric mean.
3.2. Discussion

The composition of the EOs might be affected by the developmental stages and geographical region of the plant [5, 7, 24]. Similar to the previous reports [1520], we identified nepetalactone isomers as the major constituent of the Catnip EOs in all stages of growth, which reached its maximum level at the floral budding stage. However, some studies have detected no nepetalactones in their examined EOs and reported 1,8-cineol [30] and alpha-citral [31] as the most abundant compounds of the catnip oil. The pinene (α and β) was detected as the third main component of the EO in the present work, increasing gradually following maturation of the plant.

Food-borne pathogens are considered as one of the leading causes of gastrointestinal diseasesand mortality in less developed and developing countries [32]. In the present study, the main causes of food-borne infections including S. aureus, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes, E. coli, Shigella spp. and Salmonella spp. were inhibited by the EOs at concentration of 0.125–2  𝜇 L/mL. The results can be best compared to those of the study reported by Zenasni et al. on the same strains [17]. Many of the filamentous fungi, in particular Aspergillus species, are known for causing food spoilage and mycotoxin production. Similar to the study of Adiguzel et al., the growth of the examined Aspergillus spp. was inhibited at concentrations up to 0.5  𝜇 L/mL [15].

In the present study, the MICs of the EOs against Gram-positive bacteria were almost lower than those of Gram-negative bacteria. No significant difference was found in the MICs of the EOs between antibiotics-susceptible and antibiotics-resistant strains, suggesting that the mechanism of the action of the EO might be different from that of the tested antibiotics. As expected from the results of GC/MS analysis, no significant differences in MICs were found between the EOs distilled from different growth stages.

As nepetalactone isomers were detected as the major compounds of catnip EO, the good antimicrobial properties of the EO found in this study and the other reports might be the characteristic of nepetalactones [15, 17, 19]. However, further studies are still needed to clarify the antimicrobial properties of the isomers of nepetalactone molecule.

4. Conclusion

Nowadays there is a great demand to reduce the use of chemical preservatives in products, EOs of N. cataria with active antimicrobial properties might be a candidate as a natural source for the maintenance or extension of the shelf life of products. In addition, delectable taste and odor of the EOs is an additional benefit to its antimicrobial activities. Moreover, the EOs of N. cataria might be considered for developing antimicrobial agents and disinfectants. However, further studies especially in animal models are still required to determine the in vivo antimicrobial activity of the EO and its ingredients.


This study is a part of MD thesis of Miss Samaneh Shariati and financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Grant no. 88-01-43-1843).


  1. L. C. Tapsell, I. Hemphill, L. Cobiac et al., “Health benefits of herbs and spices: the past, the present, the future,” The Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 185, no. 4, supplement, pp. S4–S24, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  2. B. B. Aggarwal, C. Sundaram, N. Malani, and H. Ichikawa, “Curcumin: the Indian solid gold,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 595, pp. 71–75, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Billing and P. W. Sherman, “Antimicrobial functions of spices: why some like it hot,” Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 3–49, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  4. P. W. Sherman and G. A. Hash, “Why vegetable recipes are not very spicy,” Evolution and Human Behavior, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 147–163, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Zomorodian, M. J. Saharkhiz, M. J. Rahimi et al., “Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of the essential oils from three ecotypes of Zataria multiflora,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 7, no. 25, pp. 53–59, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. J. Saharkhiz, K. Zomorodian, M. R. Rezaei, F. Saadat, and M. J. Rahimi, “Influence of growth phase on the essential oil composition and antimicrobial activities of Satureia hortensis,” Natural Product Communications, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1173–1178, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  7. K. Zomorodian, M. R. Moein, Z. Goeinilori et al., “Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of the essential oilfrom Myrtus communis leaves,” Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants. In press. View at: Google Scholar
  8. S. C. Ricke, M. M. Kundinger, D. R. Miller, and J. T. Keeton, “Alternatives to antibiotics: chemical and physical antimicrobial interventions and foodborne pathogen response,” Poultry Science, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 667–675, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  9. W. C. Evans, Trease and Evans' Pharmacognosy, WB Saunders, London, UK, 1996.
  10. V. Mozaffarian, A Dictionary of Iranian Plant Names, Farhang Moaser Press, Tehran, Iran, 1996.
  11. J. A. Duke, Handbook of Medicinal Herbs, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1986.
  12. C. A. Newall, L. A. Anderson, and J. D. Phillipson, Herbal Medicines: A Guide for Health-Care Rofessionals, The Pharmaceutical Press, London, UK, 1966.
  13. A. Zargari, Medicinal Plants, Tehran University Publications, Tehran, Iran, 1990.
  14. K. H. C. Baser, N. Kirimer, M. Kurkcuoglu, and B. Demirci, “Essential oils of Nepeta species growing in Turkey,” Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 356–359, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. Adiguzel, H. Ozer, M. Sokmen et al., “Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of the essential oil and methanol extract of Nepeta cataria,” Polish Journal of Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  16. R. A. Malizia, J. S. Molli, D. A. Cardell, and J. A. Retamar, “Volatile constituents of the essential oil of Nepeta cataria L. grown in Cordoba Province (Argentina),” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 565–567, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  17. L. Zenasni, L. Bouidida, A. Hancali et al., “The essentials oils and antimicrobial activity of four Nepeta species from Morocco,” Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 111–114, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  18. N. V. Handjieva, S. S. Popov, and L. N. Evstatieva, “Constituents of essential oils from Nepeta cataria L., N. grandiflora M.B. and N. nuda L,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 639–643, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  19. C. Bourrel, F. Perineau, G. Michel, and J. M. Bessiere, “Catnip (Nepeta cataria L.) essential oil: analysis of chemical constituents, bacteriostatic and fungistatic properties,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 159–167, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  20. J. Safaei-Ghomi, Z. Djafari-Bidgoli, and H. Batooli, “Volatile constituents analysis of Nepeta cataria from central Iran,” Chemistry of Natural Compounds, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 913–915, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. A. Birkett, A. Hassanali, S. Hoglund, J. Pettersson, and J. A. Pickett, “Repellent activity of catmint, Nepeta cataria, and iridoid nepetalactone isomers against Afro-tropical mosquitoes, ixodid ticks and red poultry mites,” Phytochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 109–114, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. J. Peterson, L. T. Nemetz, L. M. Jones, and J. R. Coat, “Behavioral activity of catnip (Lamiaceae) essential oil components to the German cockroach (Blattodea: Blattellidae),” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 377–380, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  23. A. Nostro, M. A. Cannatelli, G. Crisafi, and V. Alonzo, “The effect of Nepeta cataria extract on adherence and enzyme production of Staphylococcus aureus,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 583–585, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Burt, “Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—a review,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 223–253, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. British Pharmacopoeia, HMSO, London, UK, 1988.
  26. R. P. Adams, Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol Stream, Ill, USA, 4th edition, 2007.
  27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2006, CLSI M2-A9.
  28. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa, USA, 7th edition, 2006, CLSI M7-A7.
  29. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi; Approved Standard, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2006, CLSI M38-A.
  30. S. Saeidnia, A. R. Gohari, and A. Hadjiakhoondi, “Trypanocidal activity of oil of the young leaves of Nepeta cataria L. obtained by solvent extraction,” Journal of Medicinal Plants, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 54–57, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  31. A. H. Gilani, A. J. Shah, A. Zubair et al., “Chemical composition and mechanisms underlying the spasmolytic and bronchodilatory properties of the essential oil of Nepeta cataria L.,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 405–411, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. M. Fratamico, A. K. Bhunia, and J. L. Smith, Foodborne Pathogens: Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK, 2005.

Copyright © 2012 Kamiar Zomorodian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are experiencing issues with article search and journal table of contents. We are working on a fix as to remediate it and apologise for the inconvenience.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.