Table of Contents
ISRN Education
Volume 2012, Article ID 617137, 10 pages
Research Article

Perceptions and Practices: A Survey of Professional Engineers and Architects

1English Department, Radford University Radford, VA 24141, USA
2Language and Culture Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
3Department of Math and Statistics, Radford University, Radford, VA 24141, USA

Received 7 December 2011; Accepted 10 January 2012

Academic Editors: T. A. Betts and L. Roecker

Copyright © 2012 Don Cunningham and Jill Stewart. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Anderson, Technical Communication, Wadsworth Publishing., Florence, Ky, USA, 7th edition, 2010.
  2. P. Sageev and C. J. Romanowski, “A message from recent engineering graduates in the workplace: results of a survey on technical communication skills,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 685–742, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. National Commission on Writing. (NCW), Writing: A Ticket to Work…or a Ticket Out, New York, NY, USA, 2004,
  4. STC Certification, 2011,
  5. C. R. Lanier, “Analysis of the skills called for by technical communication employers in recruitment postings,” Technical Communication, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 51–61, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Commission on Writing (NCW) National, The Neglected “R”: The Need for a Writing Revolution, New York, NY, 2003,
  7. C. Paine, P. Anderson, and B. Gonyea, “NSSE experimental questions on writing: selected results,” in Proceedings of theWriting Program Administration and/as Learning (WPA '08), Denver, Colo, USA, 2008.
  8. N. Allen and S. Benninghoff, “TPC program snapshots: developing curricula and addressing challenges,” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 157–185, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  9. E. Kaneko, W. Rozycki, and T. Orr, “Survey of workplace English needs among computer science graduates,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC '09), Commitment to Excellence, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2009.
  10. D. Cunningham, “Trends in curricular matters for science and technology journalism,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on the Convergence of Technology and Professional Communication: Racing into the Future, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA, 2006.
  11. W. Hart-Davidson, “On writing, technical communication, and information technology: the core competencies of technical communication,” Technical Communication, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 145–155, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. T. Rainey, R. K. Turner, and D. Dayton, “Do curricula correspond to managerial expectations? Core competencies for technical communicators,” Technical Communication, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 323–352, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Turner and K. Rainey, “Certification in technical communication,” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 211–234, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Whiteside, Bridging theory and practice: an investigation of recent technical communication graduates in business and industry, M.S. thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn, USA, 2002.
  15. A. L. Whiteside, “The skills that technical communicators need: an investigation of technical communication graduates, managers, and curricula,” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 303–318, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Smith, “What is “good” technical communication? A comparison of the standards of writing and engineering instructors,” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7–24, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  17. N. Amare and C. Brammer, “Perceptions of memo quality: a case study of engineering practitioners, professors, and students,” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 179–190, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus