Table of Contents
ISRN Mathematical Physics
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 617291, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/617291
Research Article

On Delayed Choice and Contingent Absorber Experiments

University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-4450, USA

Received 5 August 2011; Accepted 5 September 2011

Academic Editors: D. Gepner and F. Sugino

Copyright © 2012 R. E. Kastner. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. A. Wheeler, “The “past” and the “delayed-choice” double-slit experiment,” in Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, A. R. Marlow, Ed., p. 13, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. G. Cramer, “The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 647–687, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. T. Maudlin, Quantum Nonlocality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics, Wiley-Blackwell, London, UK, 2nd edition, 2002.
  4. J. Berkovitz, “On causal loops in the quantum realm,” in Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Modality, Probability and Bell's Theorems, T. Placek and J. Butterfield, Eds., pp. 233–255, Kluwer, 2002.
  5. J. G. Cramer, “The quantum handshake: a review of the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics,” in Proceedings of the Time-Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics Conference, Sydney, Australia, July 2005, http://faculty.washington.edu/jcramer/PowerPoint/Sydney_20050723_a.ppt.
  6. D. J. Miller, “Private communication,” 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. H. Stapp, “Retrocausal effects as a consequence of orthodox quantum mechanics refined to accommodate the principle of sufficient reason,” submitted to Quantum Physics, http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2053/.
  8. A. Elitzur, “Private communication,” 2009. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Berkovitz, “On predictions in retro-causal interpretations of quantum mechanics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 709–735, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. R. E. Kastner, “Cramer's transactional interpretation and causal loop problems,” Synthese, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. L. Marchildon, “Causal loops and collapse in the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Physics Essays, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 422–429, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  12. Y. Aharonov, P. G. Bergmann, and J. L. Lebowitz, “Time symmetry in the quantum process of measurement,” Physical Review, vol. 134, no. 6 B, pp. B1410–B1416, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. R. E. Kastner, “Time-symmetrised quantum theory, counterfactuals and ‘advanced action’,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 237–259, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  14. R. E. Kastner, “Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 649–658, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar