Table of Contents
ISRN Metallurgy
Volume 2012, Article ID 639319, 5 pages
Research Article

Effect of Artificial Aging on Plane Anisotropy of 6063 Aluminium Alloy

Department of Metallurgical & Materials Engineering, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria

Received 15 December 2011; Accepted 11 January 2012

Academic Editor: P. Lukac

Copyright © 2012 S. O. Adeosun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Most aluminum profiles’ production by deep-drawing and extrusion processes require certain degree of structural homogeneity because of the segregated second-phase particles in the as-cast structure. Rolled texture and directionality in properties often give rise to excessive earring, breakout, and tears. This study investigates the effect of heat treatment (artificial aging) on the anisotropic behavior of AA6063 alloy between rolling direction (0°) through 90° directions. The results show significant reduction in property variability in the aged samples along the rolling direction 0°, and 90° directions compared with the as-cast samples. This gave rise to improved % elongation, impact toughness, and substantial reduction (33.3%) in hardness. These results are capable of achieving huge savings in die conditioning and replacement with improved quality and sale of deep-drawn AA6063 alloy profiles for sustained profitability.

1. Introduction

In metal forming, texture gradients often ensued due to nonhomogeneous flow. Texture heterogeneities can also occur in other deformation modes, such as sheet rolling, wire drawing and tube extrusion. Thus, in many industrial forming processes for aluminum, mechanical loading is usually combined with some form of heat treatment such as annealing between deformation steps. This serves the purpose of mitigating substantially strain-hardening phenomenon during deformation. A particular example is the stretching of aluminum parts in a number of stages with intermediate annealing treatments. However, this heating and cooling cycle often results in time wastage and could be minimized.

The cause of work hardening during mechanical working varies in different aluminium alloy compositions.

Hardening of nonheat treatable Al-Mg alloys is due mainly to the presence of solute atoms in solid solution. In heat treatable Al-Mg-Si and Al-Cu alloys, strengthening is determined by precipitates formed during aging treatment. For room-temperature forming, the material behaviour of aluminum sheet is completely determined by work hardening and almost independent of the strain rate [1].

Previous study showed that profiles extruded from both homogenized and unhomogenized billets did exhibit the same mechanical properties and metallurgical features [2]. Hence, the whole homogenizing process could be eliminated without compromising any of the mechanical properties. It is established that the factors that determine behaviour of aluminium alloy component are the type, amount, and distribution of second-phase particles such as Al-Fe, Al- Fe-Si, and Al-Fe-Mn-Si dissolved in solution [3]. Furthermore, the phases formed depend mainly on the cooling rate and the Fe/Si ratio in the alloy [4]. Manganese as a common addition in 6XXX alloys increases strength as finely precipitated intermetallics modifies the shape of plate-like iron phases which reduces their embrittling effect [5]. The combination of manganese with Fe, Si, and Al also forms α-Alx(Fe,Mn)ySiz phase that acts as nucleation sites for Mg2Si crystals, which eventually influences the alloys behavior [6].

Hence, precipitation-hardened aluminium alloys are commercially important group of materials because their mechanical properties can be modified by heat treatment. However, the imperative of even distribution of the precipitated phases to achieve structural homogeneity is a major challenge. This paper studies the impact of ambient temperature rolling and artificial aging on the normal anisotropy, tensile strength, hardness, and impact resistance of 6063 aluminum alloy.

2. Experimental Methodology

The composition of AA6063 alloy used for this study is given in Table 1. Moulds for the castings were made using hard-wood pattern of dimension 350 mm ×150 mm ×15 mm. In the aluminum alloy, 15 kg was charged into a crucible and placed in a pit furnace until molten at 670°C. The molten alloy was poured into the sand moulds and allowed to solidify.

Table 1: Chemical composition of Al 6063 alloy.

The cleaned casts were divided into three groups, namely, control samples (CS), cold rolled sample (RS), and cold rolled and precipitation hardened sample (RAS) for further processing.

RS and RAS samples were homogenized in a Carbolite furnace at 515°C for 8 hours, air cooled and cold rolled (at 27.4°C surface temperature) to 451 mm × 163 mm ×10 mm samples in 13 passes (at 34.4°C surface temperature) (Figure 1). Standard tensile test pieces were machined (ASTM (E8)) from CS, RS, and RAS samples at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90° directions using the rolling direction as datum line. Similarly standard, impact, and hardness tests pieces were machined (Figure 1).

Figure 1: (a) Test pieces cut at different angles to the rolling direction (b) standard test samples (i) tensile, (ii) impact, and (iii) hardness.

RAS test pieces were subjected to solution heat treatment at 515°C for 8 hours and furnace cooled. These solutionized pieces were artificially aged at 190°C for 8 hours and air cooled to room temperature. Standard microstructural test pieces from CS, RS, and RAS were ground using emery paper with grit 220 to 600 microns in succession. The ground surfaces of the pieces were polished using a mixture of Al2O3 and diamond paste before been etched a solution containing 5 grammes of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) dissolved in 100 mL of water, for 20 seconds and dried. The etched surfaces crystals morphology was carried out using a Digital Metallurgical Microscope at ×800 magnification, and the photomicrographs are shown in Figures 7(a)7(i).

There were 21 samples each for tensile, hardness, and impact tests for the three categories of cast samples. A Vickers microhardness tester model “Deco” 2005 with a test load of 100 g and a dwell time of 10 s was used for the test pieces’ hardness determination. Avery Impact Testing Machine (Charpy Tester) model type number 6703 and serial number E67424/4 with a striking velocity of 298.1 J/s was used for impact energy absorption capacity of the test pieces.

3. Results and Discussion

In the aged sample, the hardness in the rolling direction is 51.5 HV which is higher than at 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° directions but lower to that at 45° (56 HV) and 75° (57.1 HV) directions. Hardness at 45° and 75° directions is similar in as-cast sample, but in the rolling direction it is 77.1 HV.

However, the as-cast hardness value declined at 15° (64.5 HV) but increased again at 30° (78.1 HV) and remain almost the same at 45° (76.2 HV), 60° (75.1 HV) and 75° (72.3 HV) respectively. Thus, peak hardness for as-cast sample is attained in the direction perpendicular to rolling direction. The rolled sample has 76.8 HV in the rolling direction and maximum of 91.1 HV in the 90° direction.

The hardness of rolled sample is superior to as-cast sample in all directions except in the rolling direction where both samples have similar and comparable hardness response (Figure 2). Hardness across the surface for as-cast and cold rolled samples varied considerably at 20% and 15%, respectively. The process of aging the as-cast structure of 6063 aluminum alloy considerably reduced its hardness by about 33.3%, and this paved way for improved formability. The impact energy resistances of the samples show sinusoidal pattern (Figure 3). The as-cast sample has minimum impact energy absorption (8.1 J) at 15° and maximum of 12.3 J at 60° and 75° directions. Rolled sample has 6.8 J at 15°, 30°, and 90° directions which is less to that in rolling (8 J), 45°, and 75° directions (9.5 J). For the aged sample, a minimum energy absorption capacity of 6.8 J occurred at 75° direction and maximum of 12.2 J at 30° and 45° directions. Minimal variation in impact toughness behaviour of test samples is observed. This is because the preponderance and the texture of AlFeSi, and other toughness promoting intermetallic phases present do not differ appreciably across the sample surface.

Figure 2: Hardness variations across sample surface.
Figure 3: Impact energy variations across sample surface.

The tensile strength of as-cast sample is maximum (305 MPa) in the rolling direction and 125 MPa minimum at 60° direction. Tensile strength of 270 MPa is obtained in the rolled sample both in the rolling and 90° directions. The tensile strength of the aged sample oscillates between 210 MPa and 180 MPa with peak and minimum strengths at 15° and 60° directions, respectively (Figure 4). The elongations of the samples are similar (1.15) in the rolling direction and are better to that in other directions in as-cast and rolled samples. In the 60° direction, the elongation of aged sample is 1.4 (Figure 5).

Figure 4: Ultimate tensile stress (UTS) variations across sample surface.
Figure 5: Elongation variations across sample surface.

In the rolling direction, the normal anisotropy of the samples displayed close responses as the values lie between 0.14 and 0.17. The maximum normal anisotropy for as-cast sample is 0.3 at 15° direction, while the sample’s minimum is 0.14 at 45° direction. Normal anisotropy is 0.21 in the 90° direction for rolled sample and 0.03 minimum at 60° direction. The aged sample has maximum normal anisotropy of 0.33 at 30° direction 0.29 in 45° direction (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Normal anisotropy variations across sample surface.
Figure 7: Micrographs of samples (a) as-cast at 0°, (b) rolled at 0°, (c) rolled and precipitation Hardened at 0°, (d) as-cast at 45°, (e) rolled at 45°, (f) rolled and precipitation Hardened at 45°, (g) as-cast at 90°, and (h) rolled at 90° (i) rolled and precipitation hardened at 90°.

In the rolling direction Mg2Si crystals are formed at the grain boundaries in α-aluminum matrix of as-cast sample but are discontinuous threadlike feature in the rolled matrix caused by deformation process. In the aged matrix, the intermetallic crystals are precipitated alongside α- aluminum crystals in company of other intermetallics with high nominal volume fraction than in the as-cast and rolled matrixes (Figures 7(a), 7(b), and 7(c)).

At 45°, there is significant increase in the nominal volume fraction of Mg2Si crystals which were precipitated in tandem with the α-aluminum crystal and other intermetallics in as-cast matrix. The cold rolled matrix showed decrease in volume of Mg2Si crystals precipitated while its crystals point in the slip direction. However, there was an increase in nominal volume fraction of Mg2Si crystals resident at the grain boundaries in aged-sample matrix than in rolled matrix (Figures 7(d), 7(e), and 7(f)).

In the as-cast matrix fairly fine crystals of Mg2Si are precipitated side by side with crystals of α-aluminum and other intermetallics. As the as-cast sample is being rolled, there is an increase in volume clustering of Mg2Si crystals in the matrix.

However, by aging the cold rolled sample, recrystallization and precipitation of fresh Mg2Si crystals occurred in between crystals of α-aluminum and those of other intermetallics in directional pattern (Figures 7(g), 7(h), and 7(i)).

Nucleation of semicoherent precipitates, 𝜃 and θ, often occurs at elevated aging temperature [7]. The 𝜃 and θ precipitates were usually impenetrable obstacles to dislocations resulting in increased work hardening of the rolled sample over other samples. The precipitate spacing also changes with aging, as well as the heterogeneity of the precipitate distribution in the matrix. All these are responsible for the changes in mechanical properties observed with test samples.

4. Conclusion

The results of this study have shown that moderate thermal treatment and enough time allowed for recovery ensure redistribution of the Mg2Si precipitates and other intermetallics within the matrix. This phenomenon is the precursor for the improved formability, better fracture toughness, and significant reduction in hardness coupled with minimal anisotropy.


The authors are grateful to the Management and Staff of Nigerian Aluminum Extrusion (NIGALEX) Company, Oshodi, Lagos Nigeria for the provision of 6063 aluminum alloy used in this study.


  1. S. Kurukuri, Simulation of thermally assisted forming of aluminum sheet, Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Tweante, The Netherlands, 2010.
  2. G. Al-Marahleh, “Effect of heat treatment parameters on distribution and volume fraction of Mg2Si in the structural Al 6063 alloys,” American Journal of Applied Science, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1819–1823, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  3. N. C. W. Kuijpers, W. H. Kool, P. T. G. Koenis, K. E. Nilsen, I. Todd, and S. Van der Zwaag, “Assessment of different techniques for quantification of α-Al(FeMn)Si and β-AlFeSi intermetallics in AA 6xxx alloys,” Materials Characterization, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 409–420, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. A. Siddiqui, H. A. Abdullah, and K. R. Al-Belushi, “Influence of aging parameters on the mechanical properties of 6063 aluminium alloy,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 234–240, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. K. Gupta, D. J. Lloyd, and S. A. Court, “Precipitation hardening in Al—Mg—Si alloys with and without excess Si,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 316, no. 1-2, pp. 11–17, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Sha, K. O'Reilly, B. Cantor, J. Worth, and R. Hamerton, “Growth related metastable phase selection in a 6xxx series wrought Al alloy,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 304—306, no. 1-2, pp. 612–616, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Sehitoglu, T. Foglesong, and H. J. Maier, “Precipitate effects on the mechanical behavior of aluminum copper alloys,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 36, pp. 1–13, 2005. View at Google Scholar