Table of Contents
ISRN Nursing
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 676905, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/676905
Research Article

Mapping the Diagnosis Axis of an Interface Terminology to the NANDA International Taxonomy

1School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Campus of Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
2Nursing Information Systems Department, University Hospital of Bellvitge, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain

Received 11 March 2012; Accepted 8 May 2012

Academic Editors: B. Mandleco and A. Williams

Copyright © 2012 Maria-Eulàlia Juvé Udina et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. A. Matney, R. DaDamio, C. Couderc et al., “Translation and Integration of CCC Nursing Diagnoses into ICNP,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 791–793, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Bakken, M. S. Cashen, E. A. Mendonca, A. O'Brien, and J. Zieniewicz, “Representing nursing activities within a concept-oriented terminological system: evaluation of a type definition,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. Y. So and H. A. Park, “Exploring the possibility of information sharing between the medical and nursing domains by mapping medical records to SNOMED CT and ICNP,” Health Information Research, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 156–161, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Müller-Staub, M. A. Lavin, I. Needham, and T. van Achterberg, “Meeting the criteria of a nursing diagnosis classification: evaluation of ICNP®, ICF, NANDA and ZEFP,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 702–713, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Moss, A. Coenen, and M. E. Mills, “Evaluation of the draft international standard for a reference terminology model for nursing actions,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 36, no. 4-5, pp. 271–278, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Moss and V. Saba, “Costing nursing care: using the clinical care classification system to value nursing intervention in an acute-care setting,” Computers Informatics Nursing, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 455–460, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. American Nurses Association (ANA). ANA recognized terminologies and Data Elements Sets, 2012, http://www.nursingworld.org/npii/terminologies.htm.
  8. M. Müller-Staub, I. Needham, M. Odenbreit, M. A. Lavin, and T. Van Achterberg, “Implementing nursing diagnostics effectively: cluster randomized trial,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 291–301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Hogston, “Nursing diagnosis and classification systems: a position paper,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 496–500, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Spitzer, “Moving into the information era: does the current nursing paradigm still hold?” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 786–793, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. M. C. Mason and M. Attree, “The relationship between research and the nursing process in clinical practice,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1045–1049, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. J. Mcdonald, “The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 213–221, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. T. Rosenbloom, R. A. Miller, K. B. Johnson, P. L. Elkin, and S. H. Brown, “Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health records,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 277–288, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. E. Juvé-Udina, “Development of a clinical assessment system based on the theory of complexity and the nursing science,” Nursing, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 50–55, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. E. Juvé-Udina, “Philosophical and theoretical foundations for the development and validation of a nursing interface terminology,” Part I. Revista de Enfermería, vol. 35, no. 4, 2012 (Spanish). View at Google Scholar
  16. M. E. Juvé-Udina, “Inductive evaluation of a nursing interface terminology: conceptualization of the nursing process” (Spanish), Nursing. In press.
  17. R. Reis da Silva, A. Malucelli, and M. R. Cubas, “Classificações de enfermagem: mapeamento entre termos do foco da prática,” Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 835–840, 2008 (Portuguese). View at Google Scholar
  18. S. Hyun and H. A. Park, “Cross-mapping the ICNP with NANDA, HHCC, Omaha system and NIC for unified nursing language system development,” International Nursing Review, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 99–110, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. R. Cubas, C. M. Gaspar Carvalho, and A. Malucelli, “Gonzalez Martinez Denipote A. Mapeamento dos termos do eixo ação entre diferentes classificações de enfermagem,” Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 355–360, 2011 (Portuguese). View at Google Scholar
  20. P. de Oliveira Salgado and T. Machado Chianca, “Identification and mapping of the nursing diagnosis and actions in na intensive care unit,” Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 928–935, 2011 (Portuguese). View at Google Scholar
  21. N. R. Hardiker and A. L. Rector, “Structural validation of nursing terminologies,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 212–221, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Wieteck, “Furthering the development of standardized nursing terminology through an ENP®-ICNP® cross-mapping,” International Nursing Review, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 296–304, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International, Diagnósticos Enfermeros. Definiciones y Clasificación 2009–2011, Elsevier, Barcelona, Spain, 2010.
  24. S. T. Rosenbloom, R. A. Miller, K. B. Johnson, P. L. Elkin, and S. H. Brown, “A model for evaluating interface terminologies,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 65–76, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. F. Marin, R. J. Rodrigues, C. Delaney, G. H. Nielsen, and J. Yan, Eds., Building Standard-Based Nursing Information Systems, World Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA, 2000, http://www.ehealthstrategies.com/files/nursing_IS_standards.pdf.
  26. L. Whittenburg, “Nursing terminology: documentation of quality outcomes,” Journal of Healthcare Information Management, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 51–55, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. P. Sewell and L. Q. Thede, Informatics and Nursing: Opportunities and Challenges. Online Glossary of Terms, 2012, http://dlthede.net/Informatics/glossary2.html.
  28. R. R. Reischman and H. N. Yarandi, “Critical care cardiovascular nurse expert and novice diagnostic cue utilization,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 24–34, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. E. Juvé-Udina, S. Farrero-Muñoz, D. Monterde-Prat et al., “Expertise threshold for nursing competent performance,” Metas de Enfermería, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 8–17, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  30. R. D. Zielstorff, C. Tronni, J. Basque, L. R. Griffin, and E. M. Welebob, “Mapping nursing diagnosis nomenclatures for coordinated care,” Journal of Nursing Scholarship, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 369–373, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Ozbolt, “Terminology standards for nursing: collaboration at the summit,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 517–522, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus