Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
ISRN Surgery
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 729086, 12 pages
Review Article

Hemostatic Agents in Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery: A Review of the Literature and Critical Evaluation of a Novel Carrier-Bound Fibrin Sealant (TachoSil)

1Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA
2Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery and Islet Cell Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA

Received 21 May 2012; Accepted 24 July 2012

Academic Editors: J.-M. Catheline, G. Nasso, and B. H. Yong

Copyright © 2012 K. A. Simo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Background. Despite progress in surgical techniques applied during hepatobiliary and pancreas (HPB) surgery, bleeding and bile leak remain significant contributors to postoperative mortality and morbidity. Topical hemostatics have been developed and utilized across surgical specialties, but data regarding effectiveness remains inconsistent and sparse in HPB surgery. Methods. A comprehensive search for studies and reviews on hemostatics in HPB surgery was performed via an October 2011 query of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. In-depth evaluation of a novel carrier-bound fibrin sealant (TachoSil) was also performed. Results. The literature review illustrates multiple attempts have been made at developing different topical hemostatics and sealants to aid in surgical procedures. In HPB surgery, efforts have been directed at decreasing bleeding, biliary leakage, and pancreatic fistula. Conflicting scientific evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of these agents. Critical evaluation of the literature demonstrates TachoSil is a valuable tool in achieving hemostasis, and possibly biliostasis and pancreatic fistula prevention. Conclusion. While progress has been made in topical hemostatics for HPB surgery, an ideal agent has not yet been identified. TachoSil is promising, but larger randomized, controlled clinical trials are required to more fully evaluate its efficacy in reducing bleeding, biliary leakage, and pancreatic fistulas in HPB surgery.

1. Introduction

Improvements in hepatobiliary and pancreas (HPB) surgery over the past 2 decades have resulted in low surgical mortality (<1 to 5%) and morbidity rates (4 to 20%) in high-volume centers [13]. However, bleeding (specifically diffuse oozing from the raw resection surface) and bile leakage continue to be problematic in these operations, both intraoperatively, as well as, in the postoperative period. While there are thousands of publications available in various surgical fields regarding the use of hemostats, glues, and sealants; a very small number have focused on HPB surgery [46]. Differing requirements and needs for each surgical specialty should lead one to apply caution before inferring equal appropriateness and efficacy of hemostatic (and bilostatic) agents across specialties [7].

A very thorough update and comparison of FDA-approved topical hemostats (capable of clotting blood), sealants (provide a sealing barrier in the presence or absence of blood), and adhesives (bond tissues together) in the “surgical toolbox” was recently performed by Spotnitz and Burks [8, 9]. These authors have previously discussed five performance categories that should be considered in the evaluation of any potential hemostatic agent: safety, efficacy, usability, cost, and approvability [7]. Furthermore, it is stressed that hemostatic agents must be used/applied appropriately so that maximum efficacy can be achieved [8, 9]. They also note that currently, the indications for usage and choice of agents are heterogeneous and for the most part based on the individual surgeon’s preference [8, 9]. Likewise, others also note this selection and application is often done without in-depth knowledge of pharmacodynamic characteristics and specific strengths of various agents [5]. Table 1 list all topical hemostatics and sealants currently approved by the FDA as per their website ( as of December 2011. It is important to note that only a few of the approved hemostatics have a specific indication for HPB surgery. Other FDA approved hemostatics are also frequently used off-label in HPB surgery, as in other subspecialities.

Table 1: Topical hemostatics and sealant agents approved by the FDA as of December 2011.

The goal of this paper is to briefly discuss the use of current routine hemostatic agents in HPB surgery and then to perform an in-depth examination of a novel carrier-bound fibrin sealant that permits the simultaneous application of collagen, fibrin, and thrombin (TachoSil, NycomedGmbH, Linz, Austria).

2. Methods

Current literature concerning the utilization and effectiveness of topical hemostatic (and bilostatic) agents was reviewed. A comprehensive search for studies and reviews on the use of hemostatic agents in HPB surgery was performed including an October 2011 electronic search of Medline via Pubmed and EMBASE databases and browsing references. Search terms included “hemostat,” “hepatobiliary,” “pancreas,” “liver,” “bile duct,” “fibrin,” “hepatectomy”, and “pancreatectomy”. Also, an in-depth evaluation of a novel carrier-bound fibrin sealant (TachoSil) was carried out with search terms of “TachoSil”, “TachoComb”, and “TachoCombH” in conjunction with “hepatobiliary” and “pancreas”. The article selection process is summarized in Figure 1. Articles were excluded if their focus was not the use of a hemostatic agent, the agent was only mentioned in a description of a procedure, the hemostatic agent was not topical, or hemostasis discussed was not related to hepatobiliary and pancreas surgery. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was then cross-checked to confirm that no similar reviews have already been undertaken.

Figure 1: QUORUM flowchart.

3. Results

The mainstay of topical hemostatic agents in HPB Surgery have included absorbable gelatin sponges (e.g., Gelfoam, Pfizer, New York, NY), oxidized regenerated cellulose (e.g., Surgicel Ethicon, Inc., Summerville, NJ), gelatin-thrombin matrix (e.g., FloSeal, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Hayward, CA, USA), collagen and thrombin combinations (e.g., CoStasis Surgical Hemostat, Cohesion Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA), synthetic sprayable polymeric matrix (e.g., Coseal, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Hayward, CA), and/or fibrin glue homemade or manufactured (e.g., TISSEEL, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Westlake Village, CA, and Crosseal, OMRIX biopharmaceuticals Ltd., Kiryat Ono, Israel, now replaced in the USA by Evicel, Johnson and Johnson, Somerville, NJ). These hemostatics have been used separately and in different combinations with varying success (10 to 60% bleeding complications and 4 to 8% bile leaks reported) [10, 11]. Application of these agents is carried out routinely and without any particular standardized indication. As we progress further into the modern surgical era, the search for an “ideal hemostatic agent” for hepatobiliary and pancreas procedures, although elusive, continues.

Finding this “ideal hemostatic agent” is important, because reduced blood loss and ensuing reduction in blood transfusions has been demonstrated to result in superior surgical outcomes in HPB operations [1]. Furthermore, not only can these agents decrease bleeding, but they may also reduce operative time, improve quality of surgical tissue management and decrease the occurrence of biliary, pancreatic and enteric anastomotic leaks [8, 9]. In patients undergoing a liver resection, decreased liver reserve and cirrhosis need to be taken into account as this can further complicate the achievement of hemostasis following resection.

3.1. Current Routine Hemostatic Agents Utilized in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgeries

Specifically, in regards to hemostasis in HPB surgery, a numerical bleeding score analysis after liver biopsy in a heparinized swine model demonstrated statistically significant hemostatic superiority of porcine gelatin sponge with human thrombin in comparison to porcine gelatin sponge and saline [8, 12]. This superiority was demonstrated in a second study which looked at grade IV-V liver and splenic lacerations in a hemorrhagic shock porcine model where bovine gelatin granules and thrombin (FloSeal) were utilized and found to be effective at achieving hemostasis in all animals [8, 13]. Clot integration was also demonstrated at 48 hours on histological examination [8, 13]. Also, Chapman et al. in a randomized controlled trial of 76 patients undergoing hepatic resection, demonstrated that a mixture of bovine collagen and bovine thrombin is more effective in controlling and stopping diffuse hepatic bleeding than a collagen alone [10, 14].

While value of fibrin as a hemostatic agent was first noted by Bergel in 1909; it was not made commercially available in Europe until 1972, and in 1998 became the first fibrin product approved by the FDA for use in the US [9]. Fibrin sealants remain the only products available in the US with FDA approval for hemostatic, sealant and adhesive bonding indications [9, 15]. In a randomized controlled trial of 121 patients undergoing hepatic resection, 58 patients were randomized to treatment with a 2-component fibrin sealant (Crosseal, Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ) and 63 patients to standard topical hemostatic agents such as Gelfoam or Surgicel, used alone or in combination. Fibrin sealant was shown to significantly improve the time to hemostasis in comparison to standard topical hemostatic agents ( 𝑃 = 0 . 0 0 3 ) [16].

Consideration for the usage of topical agents in the prevention of bile leakage in liver surgery is controversial with a plethora of studies supporting both sides of the argument [10]. Likewise, application of tissue sealants and adhesives to seal the transected edge of the pancreas in order to prevent a pancreatic fistula also remains controversial [8].

In a recent prospective randomized study of 300 patients undergoing liver resection, with 150 being treated with fibrin glue after hemostasis was achieved; the primary objective was to determine if fibrin sealant could decrease postoperative blood loss and blood transfusion [4]. Secondary objectives addressed postoperative drainage, incidence of biliary fistula, frequency of reoperation secondary to bleeding or biliary leakage, and frequency of intra-abdominal abscess requiring percutaneous drainage [4]. Tissucol (name under which TISSEEL was marketed in some countries; Baxter-Immuno, Vienna, Austria) in aerosol form was applied to the raw liver surface, followed by application of an absorbable collagen sponge (Johnson & Johnson, Somerville, NJ), with concomitant manual pressure [4]. In comparison to the control group in which no hemostatic agents were utilized, no statistically significant differences were noted for postoperative outcomes, hospital mortality, or overall postoperative morbidity [4]. The authors concluded that application of fibrin sealant on the raw surface of the liver does not seem justified and suggest that discontinuation of routine use of fibrin sealant in these cases.

3.2. TachoSil in Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery

TachoSil is a ready-to-use fixed combination hemostatic agent consisting of a white honeycomb-like collagen patch coated with the coagulation factors, human fibrinogen, and human thrombin on one side (colored yellow with riboflavin for orientation) (Figures 2 and 3). The patch design takes advantage of the mechanical support of a collagen fleece, as well as the hemostatic and adhesive properties of the coagulation factors I and IIa [2]. Fibrinogen and thrombin are delivered directly to the site of bleeding in order to form a fibrin network effectively gluing the patch to the desired surface (wound, cut liver edge, or anastomosis) [17]. The coagulation cascade is locally activated mimicking the final steps of natural blood clotting to seal tissue [18] (Figure 4). Degradation and reabsorption of the patch and resultant fibrin clot is achieved during the normal healing process [10].

Figure 2: TachoSil packaging.
Figure 3: TachoSil Ready-To-Use Surgical Patch. Coating anchored to the indentions as denoted by arrow.
Figure 4: Hemostatic matrix mechanism of action of TachoSil illustrated via the coagulation cascade.

TachoSil represents the most current formulation of a unique carrier-bound fibrin sealant and differs from its precursors, TachoComb and TachoCombH, as earlier components of bovine origin have been eliminated (aprotinin). These precursors were previously approved for use in Europe and Japan (TachoCombH is still in use in some countries but is being phased out and replaced with TachoSil). In the USA, TachoSil was granted approval in 2010 for use as an adjunct to hemostasis for use in cardiovascular surgery when control of bleeding by standard surgical techniques (such as suture, ligature, or cautery) is ineffective or impractical. TachoSil should not be used in the renal pelvis or near the ureter, for skin closures, or neurosurgical procedures [19].

Outside the USA, the current EMA approved indication for TachoSil is for use in adults as supportive treatment in surgery for improvement of hemostasis to promote tissue sealing and for suture support in vascular surgery where standard techniques are insufficient [20]. In addition, TachoSil has also been shown to have multiple other applications including prevention of adhesions and erosions, protection of nerves, and occlusion of structures such as bronchioles, lymph vessels, and bile ducts [21]. Again specifically in this paper, we focus on evaluation of the efficacy and safety of TachoSil and its precursors in HPB surgery.

3.3. Abdominal Vasculature

Following extensive HPB surgery, hemostasis following hepatic or portal vein reconstruction can be challenging. This can result from inherent liver disease that is frequently present in this patient population, or in the presence of invasive tumors in the pancreas and duodenum which can be technically difficult to excise predisposing to large volume hemorrhage if injury/laceration occurs. An alternative approach to the traditional repair of vein lacerations using vascular sutures has been studied in the preclinical setting with the use of TachoSil transposed onto a peritoneal patch [22]. In this series, TachoSil was shown to be efficacious in repairing induced inferior vena cava defects in a swine model; the use of a peritoneal patch helps to prevent lumen thrombosis by serving as a barrier from the coagulant portion of the TachoSil sheet. It has also been employed as reinforcement for the sutured anastomosis of the portal vein [23] and has been shown to be useful in the repair of hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm when it develops as a postoperative complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy [24]. Another application of TachoSil for vasculature reconstruction has been described by Shimamoto and colleagues for aortic arch repair [25]. In this study, TachoSil combined pledget stitches which significantly helped to control suture hole bleeding as compared with conventional pledget stitches. This novel application of TachoSil could likely be transferred to intra-abdominal aortic or other large vessel repairs.

3.4. Liver Preclinical

The preclinical evaluation of TachoSil has provided evidence for a variety of uses in the field of liver surgery. Early investigations with the TachoSil precursor TachoComb, a collagen fleece patch with fibrinogen, thrombin and aprotinin, have demonstrated initial clinical efficacy for hemostasis following experimentally produced penetrating liver and spleen injury models [26]. Adding to our understanding of hemostasis following liver hemorrhage, TachoSil has also been investigated in an animal model of coagulopathy with blunt liver injury [27]. In this investigation, coagulopathy was achieved by splenectomy and cystotomy followed by hemodilution of 80% blood volume. Blunt liver injury was then induced and the injury treated with either cotton placebo patch or TachoSil fibrinogen/thrombin (FT) patch. All animals treated with the FT patch survived, whereas, all animals in the control group died prior to the end of the observation period. These results demonstrate the efficacy of the TachoSil patch in effectively controlling hemorrhage in the presence of severe coagulopathy.

In a head-to-head trial, TachoSil was compared with a regenerated oxidized cellulose compress (Surgicel, Johnson and Johnson, Somerville, NJ) and a bovine collagen-based compress (Sangustop, B. Braun Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) [28]. Liver resection margins were created in a swine model and each of the three compresses applied to different areas of resection margin. Bleeding time and number of compresses required to achieve hemostasis were then measured. The bovine collagen product performed the best in this series with the lowest bleeding time and fewest numbers of compresses required to stop hemorrhage. A second comparative trial of advanced hemostatic dressings evaluated nine different products in a swine model of induced liver venous hemorrhage injury [29]. Four products in this series were excluded from further study secondary to exclusion criteria of no survival or no hemostasis. Of the remaining products evaluated, the American Red Cross fibrinogen and thrombin dressing (currently only available in the USA military) on an absorbable polyglactin mesh were the most favorable in terms of posttreatment blood loss and percentage of animals in which hemostasis was obtained as compared with the TachoComb-S and other hemostatic dressings. In overall, survival during the experimental time period TachoComb-S ranked third.

To examine the effectiveness of TachoSil in sealing of bile ducts, a swine model was utilized in which a medial left liver resection was completed and the cut surface treated with either the fibrin collagen patch or the liquid fibrin sealant (Tissucol Duo 500, Baxter Hyland Immuno, Uden, the Netherlands) [30]. After increasing pressure into the common bile duct, the fibrin collagen patch was found to resist significantly higher intrabiliary pressures prior to bile leakage as compared with the liquid fibrin sealant. Hemostasis in the two groups was equally effective.

3.5. Liver Clinical

Use of fibrin-based hemostatic agents and sealants in open liver resection has gained support through numerous publications citing its efficacy in adjunctive hemorrhage control, decrease in postoperative drain fluid output and biliostasis [5, 3135]. A prospective controlled trial from Briceño and colleagues compared outcomes of 115 patients undergoing major and minor hepatectomies with or without TachoSil as a carrier bound fibrin sealant hemostatic agent [2]. In this series, the TachoSil group was found to be associated with decreased drainage volume ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 ), lower volume drain output per day ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 ), decreased postoperative blood transfusion rate ( 𝑃 = 0 . 0 4 ), shorter mean hospital stay ( 𝑃 = 0 . 0 3 ), and fewer moderate to severe postoperative complications ( 𝑃 = 0 . 0 3 ). This study’s findings are in direct contrast to results published in 2007 in which a comparative cohort study of liver resections performed in 173 patients with TachoComb and 222 patients without TachoComb [36]. No significant differences were seen between groups in rates of postoperative blood transfusion, biliary fistula, or reoperation for postoperative hemorrhage. Currently, a prospective multicentered randomized controlled trial in Austria and Germany is enrolling patients to compare TachoSil, being described as the “gold standard”, with a new microfibrillar collagen hemostat, Sangustop [37]. Termed the ESSCALIVER study, standardization is achieved through resection technique, devices used in surgery, and methods for primary hemostasis. Patients are blinded to group selection and will be followed for three months for postoperative complications and adverse events.

Additionally, two European trials have demonstrated the hemostatic efficacy of TachoSil as compared with argon beam coagulation (ABC) in liver resection. Frilling and colleagues published results in 2005 following a trial comparing ABC to TachoSil as secondary hemostatic treatment in 121 patients who underwent planned liver resection [38]. In this series, TachoSil performed significantly better in regards to time and to hemostasis (measured from time to application to no visible bleeding evident), 3.9 minutes versus 6.3 minutes, respectively ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 ). The investigators also noticed a decrease in drain hemoglobin concentration the second day after surgery in the TachoSil group as compared with the ABC group ( 𝑃 = 0 . 0 1 2 ). No significant difference was seen between groups in regard to adverse events. A follow-up study published by Fischer and colleagues in 2011, was able to replicate some of these findings [39]. In 10 tertiary care centers, 119 patients undergoing liver resection were randomized to receive either ABC or TachoSil. Similar to the Frilling study, the mean time to hemostasis in the TachoSil group was significantly lower than the ABC group ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 ). This study did not report however, differences in postoperative drainage volume, drainage fluid, or drainage duration between the two groups. It is important to note that both of these studies were regulatory phase III trials that were aimed at providing data on the hemostatic capability of TachoSil and therefore were not sufficiently powered to determine if any differences exist in postoperative parameters.

Unique considerations exist in the field of liver transplantation as hemostasis, both intraoperative and postoperative can be difficult to achieve and biliary leaks from anastomotic suture lines or cut donor liver surfaces can cause severe postoperative complications. From the pediatric liver transplant literature, the use of TachoSil has been found to be both safe and effective in controlling hemorrhage from split liver donor grafts [40, 41]. Application is directed at all cut-liver surfaces with mild-to-moderate bleeding after primary hemostasis has been achieved. TachoSil has also been found to be effective in decreasing the frequency of bile duct leaks after adult split liver transplantation [42]. From two consecutive cohorts of 16 patients, groups were treated either with the TachoSil or fibrin glue on the cut surface of the donor liver. Bile leaks were found to be significantly fewer in the TachoSil cohort as compared with the fibrin glue cohort (6.25% versus 43.75%, resp., 𝑃 = 0 . 0 3 ).

Application of fibrin sealants and hemostatic agents have gained an increasing presence in the field of laparoscopic liver surgery as new designs for product delivery have been constructed specifically for laparoscopy [33, 43]. TachoSil is approved for laparoscopic surgery in Europe, however its application in laparoscopic liver surgery remains somewhat challenging and depends on individual surgical skill sets for mainly two reasons: (1) the active components can be disrupted from the collagen sheet, particularly when passed through a laparoscopic port and (2) the fibrinogen and thrombin coated sheet, once in contact with blood or body fluids, is activated immediately and thus becomes difficult to manipulate due to its sticky consistency [18]. Innovative techniques for intracorporeal TachoComb delivery have been previously published including a fan-shaped device or small rubber tube to introduce small strips of the hemostatic agent [44, 45]. Carbon and colleagues have also published results of successful hemorrhagic spleen repair using sheets of TachoComb delivered through a special minimally invasive applicator system [46].

At this time, the majority of published reviews of TachoSil in laparoscopic abdominal surgery have been limited to urologic surgery or splenic repair [4749]. A report from Low and colleagues, describes the use of a liquid fibrin sealant and TachoSil to control a spontaneous splenic capsule rupture during a laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal metastasis [50]. In this case, Pringle maneuver was applied in addition to the hemostatic agents to gain hemostatic control and allow for splenic salvage. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate the role of TachoSil in laparoscopic liver surgery and to compare topical hemostatic agents and their use in laparoscopy.

3.6. Pancreas

To date, evidence regarding the use of TachoSil in pancreatic surgery stems largely from retrospective reviews and small case series [5157]. Anecdotally, this evidence has supported the idea that TachoSil may decrease rates of pancreatic fistula formation secondary to its tissue sealant properties. Investigative reviews however, have not definitively supported these conclusions and conflicting recommendations have resulted. Lorenz and colleagues have reported on a retrospective analysis of 46 distal pancreatic resection comparing stapled versus sutured closure of the pancreatic stump in which TachoComb was applied to approximately 50% of cases in both groups [54]. No significant differences were found in postoperative morbidity or pancreatic fistula rate between groups, but improved outcomes tended to be superior with staple closure, with and without TachoComb. Specifically, even though there were no statistically significant differences, there were fewer leaks (1 versus 7) and none requiring surgical revision in the staple closure group (versus 2 patients with suture closure). No subset analysis was performed of patients who received TachoComb in the suture closure and staple closure groups for determination of pancreatic fistula rate. In another series, patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy, a Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction was reinforced with TachoSil on the pancreaticojejunal suture line [53]. There were 27 patients in each group; three patients in the non-TachoSil group had a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) while only one in the TachoSil group did. While the results were not statistically significant, investigators have suggested that TachoSil may help prevent POPF.

From the laparoscopic experience, Rosøk and colleagues have reported a 10% pancreatic fistula rate following laparoscopic pancreatic resections including distal pancreatectomy and pancreatic enucleation [56]. Beginning in 2005, the investigators began sealing the resection margin of remaining pancreas with TachoSil; however, they did not report a change in fistula formation following this addition. A second review of laparoscopic distal pancreatic resections in 121 patients by this group found that the addition of the TachoSil patch to the distal pancreatic resection line (also starting in 2005) did not affect occurrence of POPF or the length of hospital stay [55].

However, supportive evidence has been described for the use of collagen fleece products for hemostatic control in pancreas surgery and in the setting of surgery for acute pancreatitis. Preclinical testing involving animal models have been used to study the hemostatic and sealant abilities of TachoSil under hyperfibrinolytic conditions such as acute pancreatitis [58]. A swine model of acute pancreatitis was induced by retrograde injection of bile into the pancreatic duct with subsequent duct ligation. Hemostatic efficacy was assessed immediately and at 72 hours and was found to be equally effective. Even under conditions of increased intraorgan pressure created by ligation of the splenic vein and administration of adrenaline, hemostasis, and tissue sealing efficacy were not adversely affected by severe hyperfibrinolytic conditions. Furthermore, initial clinical experience with TachoComb, published in 1990, reviewed patients undergoing pancreatic resection for pancreatic carcinoma, necrotizing pancreatitis, and chronic pancreatitis [59]. In this series of 30 patients, collagenic fleece was useful in controlling bleeding from the retroperitoneum and pancreatic bed following resection.

A comprehensive review of fibrin sealants in pancreatic surgery published in 2009 highlights the fact that the body of the current literature does not provide conclusive evidence of the utility of fibrin sealants in pancreatic surgery [15]. At this point, the ability of fibrin sealants to decrease pancreatic fistula rate remains at best, speculative. Randomized large-scale trials are necessary to provide conclusive evidence as to the use of TachoSil and other fibrin sealants in pancreatic surgery. One is currently underway in France and results are expected in mid-to-late 2012.

3.7. Current USA TachoSil Trial

Currently, a randomized, open label, parallel group, multicenter trial is underway in the United States to evaluate the use of TachoSil in open liver surgery. In this study, the efficacy and safety of TachoSil will be compared with Surgicel Original for secondary treatment of local bleeding in open hepatic resection surgery. The primary objective is to show that TachoSil is superior to Surgicel Original as a secondary hemostat when conducting hepatic resections. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety of TachoSil in hepatic resections. The primary endpoint is intraoperative hemostasis 3 minutes after the application of the randomized treatment. Other endpoints considered in this study are the need for additional agents to reach adequate hemostatic control, the number and type of agents applied, and the failure rate with regard to achieving hemostasis. This trial is currently enrolling patients and primary results from this study are anticipated in late 2012.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, progress continues to be made in topical hemostatic agents for hepatobiliary and pancreas surgery; however, the search for the ideal agent continues. TachoSil is a promising hemostatic agent which is a third generation equine collagen fleece patch, delivering human fibrinogen and human thrombin directly to the site of bleeding for hemostasis and tissue sealing. Its applications in hepatobiliary and pancreas surgery have proven effectiveness in hemostasis and excellence as a tissue sealant. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its ability to control biliary leakage and pancreatic fistula output. Further studies to delineate the role of TachoSil and other fibrin sealants in laparoscopic surgery are also needed to demonstrate improved effectiveness and applicability.


This research is not based on any previous communication to a society or meeting.


  1. W. R. Jarnagin, M. Gonen, Y. Fong et al., “Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 236, no. 4, pp. 397–407, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Briceño, A. Naranjo, R. Ciria et al., “A prospective study of the efficacy of clinical application of a new carrier-bound fibrin sealant after liver resection,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 145, no. 5, pp. 482–488, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Makuuchi and K. Sano, “The surgical approach to HCC: our progress and results in Japan,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 10, no. 2, supplement 1, pp. S46–S52, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Figueras, L. Llado, M. Miro et al., “Application of fibrin glue sealant after hepatectomy does not seem justified: results of a randomized study in 300 patients,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 245, no. 4, pp. 536–542, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. W. Kraus, A. Mehrabi, P. Schemmer, A. Kashfi, P. Berberat, and M. W. Büchler, “Scientific evidence for application of topical hemostats, tissue glues, and sealants in hepatobiliary surgery,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 200, no. 3, pp. 418–427, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. A. Boonstra, I. Q. Molenaar, R. J. Porte, and M. T. de Boer, “Topical haemostatic agents in liver surgery: do we need them?” HPB, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 306–310, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. D. Spotnitz and S. Burks, “Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives: components of the surgical toolbox,” Transfusion, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1502–1516, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. W. D. Spotnitz and S. Burks, “Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives II: update as well as how and when to use the components of the surgical toolbox,” Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 497–514, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. W. D. Spotnitz, “Fibrin sealant: past, present, and future: a brief review,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 632–634, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Berrevoet and B. de Hemptinne, “Use of topical hemostatic agents during liver resection,” Digestive Surgery, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 288–293, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Hayashibe, K. Sakamoto, M. Shinbo, S. Makimoto, and T. Nakamoto, “New method for prevention of bile leakage after hepatic resection,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 57–60, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. L. Adams, R. J. Manson, V. Hasselblad, L. K. Shaw, and J. H. Lawson, “Acute in-vivo evaluation of bleeding with Gelfoam saline and Gelfoam plus human thrombin using a liver square lesion model in swine,” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Leixnering, J. Reichetseder, A. Schultz et al., “Gelatin thrombin granules for hemostasis in a severe traumatic liver and spleen rupture model in swine,” The Journal of Trauma, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 456–461, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. C. Chapman, P. A. Clavien, J. Fung, A. Khanna, A. Bonham, and H. B. Kram, “Effective control of hepatic bleeding with a novel collagen-based composite combined with autologous plasma: results of a randomized controlled trial,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 135, no. 10, pp. 1200–1205, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Fingerhut, N. Veyrie, T. Ata, N. Alexakis, and E. Leandros, “Use of sealants in pancreatic surgery: critical appraisal of the literature,” Digestive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Schwartz, J. Madariaga, R. Hirose et al., “Comparison of a new fibrin sealant with standard topical hemostatic agents,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 139, no. 11, pp. 1148–1154, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Joseph, A. Adeosun, T. Paes, and V. Bahal, “Randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of TachoComb H patches in controlling PTFE suture-hole bleeding,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 549–552, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Rickenbacher, S. Breitenstein, M. Lesurtel, and A. Frilling, “Efficacy of TachoSil a fibrin-based haemostat in different fields of surgery—a systematic review,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 897–907, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Federal Drug Administration, “TachoSil (Absorbable Fibrin Sealant Patch) Prescribing Information. In, Initial US approval,” 2010.
  20. S. Haas, “The use of a surgical patch coated with human coagulation factors in surgical routine: a multicenter postauthorization surveillance,” Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 445–450, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Toro, M. Mannino, G. Reale, and I. Di Carlo, “TachoSil use in abdominal surgery: a review,” Jorunal of Blood Medicine, vol. 2, pp. 31–36, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  22. E. B. Dregelid and G. Pedersen, “Treatment of major vein injury with the hemostatic fleece TachoSil by interposing a peritoneal patch to avoid vein thrombosis: a feasibility study in pigs,” Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 77–81, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. Apestegui, S. Breitenstein, P. Dutkowski, and P. A. Clavien, “Control of severe portal bleeding by carrier-bound fibrin sealant,” Surgery Today, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 363–365, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Abu Hilal, M. J. Hallam, B. A. Zeidan, and N. W. Pearce, “Management of a ruptured pseudoaneurysm of common hepatic artery following pancreaticoduodenectomy,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 7, pp. 1659–1662, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. Shimamoto, A. Marui, T. Nishina, Y. Saji, and M. Komeda, “The TachoSil-pledget stitch: towards eradication of suture hole bleeding,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 2002–2004, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Schelling, T. Block, M. Gokel, E. Blanke, C. Hammer, and W. Brendel, “Application of a fibrinogen-thrombin-collagen-based hemostyptic agent in experimental injuries of liver and spleen,” The Journal of Trauma, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 472–475, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. O. Grottke, T. Braunschweig, N. Daheim et al., “Effect of TachoSil in a coagulopathic pig model with blunt liver injuries,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 234–239, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. I. Takács, J. Wegmann, S. Horváth et al., “Efficacy of different hemostatic devices for severe liver bleeding: a randomized controlled animal study,” Surgical Innovation, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 346–352, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. E. Pusateri, H. E. Modrow, R. A. Harris et al., “Advanced hemostatic dressing development program: animal model selection criteria and results of a study of nine hemostatic dressings in a model of severe large venous hemorrhage and hepatic injury in swine,” The Journal of Trauma, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 518–526, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. Erdogan, W. de Graaf, and T. M. van Gulik, “Adhesive strength of fibrinogen-coated collagen patch or liquid fibrin sealant in an experimental liver resection model in pigs,” European Surgical Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 298–302, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. F. Eder, F. Meyer, G. Nestler, Z. Halloul, and H. Lippert, “Sealing of the hepatic resection area using fibrin glue reduces significant amount of postoperative drain fluid,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 11, no. 38, pp. 5984–5987, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. B. R. Davidson, S. Burnett, M. S. Javed, A. Seifalian, D. Moore, and N. Doctor, “Experimental study of a novel fibrin sealant for achieving haemostasis following partial hepatectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 790–795, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. Saif, M. Jacob, S. Robinson, A. Amer, D. Kei-Hui, G. Sen et al., “Use of fibrin-based sealants and gelatin-matrix hemostats in laparoscopic liver surgery,” Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 131–141, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  34. L. Capussotti, A. Ferrero, L. Viganò, E. Sgotto, A. Muratore, and R. Polastri, “Bile leakage and liver resection: where is the risk?” Archives of Surgery, vol. 141, no. 7, pp. 690–694, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. U. Sarpel, S. Roayaie, M. E. Schwartz, and D. M. Labow, “The role of fibrin sealants in hepatic surgery,” Surgical Technology International, vol. 16, pp. 31–36, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. F. Berrevoet and B. de Hemptinne, “Clinical application of topical sealants in liver surgery: does it work?” Acta Chirurgica Belgica, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 504–507, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. Moench, W. O. Bechstein, V. Hermanutz, G. Hoexter, and H. P. Knaebel, “Comparison of the collagen haemostat Sangustop versus a carrier-bound fibrin sealant during liver resection; ESSCALIVER-Study,” Trials, vol. 11, article 109, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Frilling, G. A. Stavrou, H. J. Mischinger et al., “Effectiveness of a new carrier-bound fibrin sealant versus argon beamer as haemostatic agent during liver resection: a randomised prospective trial,” Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, vol. 390, no. 2, pp. 114–120, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. L. Fischer, C. M. Seiler, C. E. Broelsch et al., “Hemostatic efficacy of TachoSil in liver resection compared with argon beam coagulator treatment: an open, randomized, prospective, multicenter, parallel-group trial,” Surgery, vol. 149, no. 1, pp. 48–55, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. Mirza, A. J. W. Millar, K. Sharif, H. Vilca-Melendez, M. Rela, and N. Heaton, “The use of TachoSil in children undergoing liver resection with or without segmental liver transplantation,” European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 111–115, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. F. Lacanna, A. Brunati, and R. Reding, “A new biological mesh for cut surface hemostasis in liver transplantation using technical variants,” Pediatric Transplantation, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 520–521, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. L. Toti, M. Attia, T. M. Manzia et al., “Reduction in bile leaks following adult split liver transplant using a fibrin-collagen sponge: a pilot study,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 205–209, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. K. Saxena and C. Van Tuil, “Advantages of fibrin glue spray in laparoscopic liver biopsies,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 545–547, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. K. Nakajima, K. Yasumasa, S. Endo et al., “A simple application technique of fibrin-coated collagen fleece (TachoComb) in laparoscopic surgery,” Surgery Today, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 176–179, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Scheyer and G. Zimmermann, “Tachocomb used in endoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 501–503, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. R. T. Carbon, S. Baar, J. Waldschmidt, H. P. Huemmer, and S. I. Simon, “Innovative minimally invasive pediatric surgery is of therapeutic value for splenic injury,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1146–1150, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. T. Erdogru, A. Sanli, O. Celik, and M. Baykara, “Laparoscopic transvesical repair of recurrent vesicovaginal fistula using with fleece-bound sealing system,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 277, no. 5, pp. 461–464, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Falsaperla, R. Autorino, M. Puglisi et al., “Haemostatic agents during laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery: what about TachoSil?” BJU International, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 270–271, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. Rane, P. D. Rimington, C. F. Heyns, A. van der Merwe, S. Smit, and C. Anderson, “Evaluation of a hemostatic sponge (TachoSil) for sealing of the renal collecting system in a porcine laparoscopic partial nephrectomy survival model,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 599–603, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. K. Low, G. D. Ayiomamitis, A. Hamoudi, and B. J. Ammori, “Spontaneous rupture of the splenic capsule with massive bleeding subsequent to the pringle maneuver during laparoscopic liver resection,” Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. e84–e86, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. K. Mita, H. Ito, M. Fukumoto et al., “Pancreaticojejunostomy using a fibrin adhesive sealant (TachoComb) for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy,” Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 58, no. 105, pp. 187–191, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. K. Mita, H. Ito, M. Fukumoto et al., “A fibrin adhesive sealing method for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy,” Hepato-Gastroenterology, vol. 58, no. 106, pp. 604–608, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. P. Chirletti, R. Caronna, G. Fanello et al., “Pancreaticojejunostomy with applicationof fibrinogen/thrombin-coated collagen patch (TachoSil) in roux-en-Y reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1396–1398, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. U. Lorenz, M. Maier, U. Steger, C. Töpfer, A. Thiede, and S. Timm, “Analysis of closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatic resection,” HPB, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 302–307, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. I. Pavlik Marangos, B. I. Røsok, A. M. Kazaryan, A. R. Rosseland, and B. Edwin, “Effect of TachoSil patch in prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1625–1629, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. B. I. Røsok, I. P. Marangos, A. M. Kazaiyan et al., “Single-centre experience of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 902–909, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. H. Seeliger, S. Christians, M. K. Angele et al., “Risk factors for surgical complications in distal pancreatectomy,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 200, no. 3, pp. 311–317, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. D. Erdogan and T. M. Van Gulik, “Evolution of fibrinogen-coated collagen patch for use as a topical hemostatic agent,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 272–278, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. D. Lorenz and J. Scheele, “The use of collagen fleece (Tachocomb) in pancreatic surgery,” Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Chirurgie Transplantation und Künstliche Organe, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 93–94, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus