Table of Contents
ISRN Ophthalmology
Volume 2012, Article ID 762784, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/762784
Clinical Study

Evaluation of Sodium Hyaluronate Lubricating Drops Used before Insertion of Contact Lenses on Symptomatology, Severity, and Intensity of Ocular Dryness

École d’Optométrie, Université de Montréal, 3744 Jean-Brillant, Montréal, QC, Canada H3T 1P1

Received 23 May 2012; Accepted 19 July 2012

Academic Editors: A. Barak, J. S. Lai, and I. J. Wang

Copyright © 2012 Langis Michaud and Benoît Frenette. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. A. Lemp, “Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes,” CLAO Journal, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 221–232, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. C. Thai, A. Tomlinson, and M. G. Doane, “Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 194–204, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. L. Chalmers, J. J. McNally, C. D. McKenney, and S. R. Robirds, “The role of dryness symptoms in discontinuation of wear and unscheduled lens removals in extended wear of silicone hydrogel lenses,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 43, 2002, ARVO E-abstract 3088. View at Google Scholar
  4. N. A. Brennan and N. Efron, “Symptomatology of HEMA contact lens wear,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 834–838, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. J. Doughty, D. Fonn, D. Richter, T. Simpson, B. Caffery, and K. Gordon, “A patient questionnaire approach to estimating the prevalence of dry eye symptoms in patients presenting to optometric practices across Canada,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 624–631, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Young, J. Veys, N. Pritchard, and S. Coleman, “A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 516–527, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Hall, S. Jones, G. Young, and S. Coleman, “The on-eye dehydration of proclear compatibles lenses,” CLAO Journal, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 233–237, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Jones, C. May, L. Nazar, and T. Simpson, “In vitro evaluation of the dehydration characteristics of silicone hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lens materials,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 147–156, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Young, R. Bowers, B. Hall, and M. Port, “Six month clinical evaluation of a biomimetic hydrogel contact lens,” CLAO Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 226–236, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. A. Lemp, B. Caffery, K. Lebow et al., “Omafilcon a (Proclear) soft contact lenses in a dry eye population,” CLAO Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. Young, R. Bowers, B. Hall, and M. Port, “Clinical comparison of Omafilcon A with four control materials,” CLAO Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 248–258, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Lebow and B. Bridgewater, “A three-month comparative daily-wear study of two high-water-content soft lenses,” International Contact Lens Clinic, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 198–206, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Osborn and J. Veys, “A new silicone hydrogel lens for contact lens-related dryness,” Optician, vol. 229, no. 6004, pp. 39–41, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  14. C. Riley, G. Young, and R. Chalmers, “Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon A),” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 281–286, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Riley, R. L. Chalmers, and N. Pence, “The impact of lens choice in the relief of contact lens related symptoms and ocular surface findings,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Ozkan and E. Papas, “Lubricant effects on low DK and silicone hydrogel lens comfort,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 773–777, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. W. Ousler, R. T. Anderson, and K. E. Osborn, “The effect of senofilcon A contact lenses compared to habitual contact lenses on ocular discomfort during exposure to a controlled adverse environment,” Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 335–341, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. R. Paugh, H. J. Marsden, T. B. Edrington, P. N. Deland, P. A. Simmons, and J. G. Vehige, “A pre-application drop containing carboxymethylcellulose can reduce multipurpose solution-induced corneal staining,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 65–71, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Dracopoulos, D. G. Dixon, L. W. Jones, J. G. Sivak, and V. Bantseev, “In vitro assessment of medical device toxicity: interactions of benzalkonium chloride with silicone-containing and p-HEMA-containing hydrogel contact lens materials,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 26–37, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. A. Rosenthal, N. L. Dassanayake, R. L. Schlitzer, B. A. Schlech, D. L. Meadows, and R. P. Stone, “Biocide uptake in contact lenses and loss of fungicidal activity during storage of contact lenses,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 262–266, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. J. Garofalo, N. Dassanayake, C. Carey, J. Stein, R. Stone, and R. David, “Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time,” Eye and Contact Lens, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 166–174, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Kusano, M. Uematsu, Y. Tanaka, T. Kumagami, and T. Kitaoka, “Acute disruption of corneal barrier after instillation of preservatives evaluated using an in vivo corneal trans-epithelial electric resistance measurement method,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2008, ARVO E-abstract 2549. View at Google Scholar
  23. C. H. Powell, S. W. Huth, J. M. Lally, and L. D. Hoong, Role of Hydrophonic and Ionic Attributes of Active Entities in Multipurpose Solutions in Driving Uptake and Release With Conventional Versus Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses, American Academy of Optometry, Anaheim, Calif, USA, 2008.
  24. M. Hom, Complete Easy Rub Vs Optifree Replenish : Evaluation of Staining, Tear Break-Up Time, and Pre-Lens Tear Thinning Time, American Academy of Optometry, Anaheim, Calif, USA, 2008.
  25. J. G. Veighe, P. A. Simmons, C. Anger, R. Graham, L. Tran, and N. Brady, “Cytoprotective properties of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) when used prior to wearing contact lens treated with cationic disinfecting agents,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 29, pp. 177–180, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. Q. Garrett, P. A. Simmons, X. Shunjiang et al., “Carboxymethylcellulose binds to human corneal epithelial cells and is a modulator of corneal epithelial wound healing,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1559–1567, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. B. Szczotka-Flynn, “Chemical properties of contactlens rewetters,” Contact Lens Spectrum. In press.
  28. J. J. Nichols, G. L. Mitchell, K. K. Nichols, R. Chalmers, and C. Begley, “The performance of the contact lens dry eye questionnaire as a screening survey for contact lens-related dry eye,” Cornea, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 469–475, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus