Table of Contents
ISRN Software Engineering
Volume 2012, Article ID 795282, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/795282
Research Article

Evaluating a Taxonomy for Mobility Requirements by a Controlled Experiment

Department of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, IDI/NTNU, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway

Received 22 August 2011; Accepted 4 October 2011

Academic Editor: U. K. Wiil

Copyright © 2012 Sundar Gopalakrishnan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Robertson and S. Robertson, Volere Requirements Specification Template, Atlantic Systems Guild, 2010.
  2. D. G. Firesmith, Common Concepts Underlying Safety, Security, and Survivability Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 2003.
  3. D.G. Firesmith, “A taxonomy of safety-related requirements,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Requirements for High Assurance Systems, (RHAS '04), p. 11, IEEE Computer Society, Kyoto, Japan, September 2004.
  4. D. G. A Firesmith, “Taxonomy of security-related requirements,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on High Assurance Systems, (RHAS '05), Paris, France, August 2005.
  5. A. I. Antón, J. B. Earp, and A. Reese, “Analyzing website privacy requirements using a privacy goal taxonomy,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Joint International Requirements Engineering Conference, K. Pohl, Ed., pp. 23–31, IEEE, Essen, Germany, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Mahaux, P. Heymans, and G. Saval, “Discovering sustainability requirements: an experience report, in requirements engineering,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Working Conference, (REFSQ '11), D. Berry and X. Franch, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 19–33, Springer, Essen, Germany, March 2011.
  7. G. Sindre, “Trust-related requirements: a taxonomy,” in Advances in Information Systems Development, G. Magyar, Ed., pp. 49–61, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. MacRuairi, M.T. Keane, and G. Coleman, “A wireless sensor network application requirements taxonomy,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, (SENSORCOMM '08), Sensor Technologies and Applications, pp. 209–216, Cap Esterel, August 2008.
  9. S. Gopalakrishnan and G. Sindre, “Taxonomy of mobility-related requirements,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications, (IESA '09), pp. 283–288, Beijing, China, April 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Gopalakrishnan and G. Sindre, “A revised taxonomy of mobility-related requirements,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Workshops, (ICUMT '09), pp. 1–7, St. Petersburg, Russia, October 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Gopalakrishnan and G. Sindre, “A study on mobile requirements elicitation by boilerplate requirements specification language,” in Proceedings of the Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Business, pp. 613–623, 2010.
  12. E. Hull, K. Jackson, and J. Dick, Requirements Engineering, Springer, London, UK, 2010.
  13. J. K. Gershenson and L. A. Stauffer, “Assessing the usefulness of a taxonomy of design requirements for manufacturing,” Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 147–158, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. S. Rounds and J. S. Cooper, “Development of product design requirements using taxonomies of environmental issues,” Research in Engineering Design, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 94–108, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. T. Haley, B. Nuseibeh, H. C. Sharp, and J. Taylor, “The conundrum of categorising requirements: managing requirements for learning on the move,” in Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, (RE '04), pp. 309–314, September 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Glinz, “On non-functional requirements,” in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International of Requirements Engineering Conference, (RE '07), pp. 21–26, October 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. C. Wohlin, Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, Mass, USA, 2000.
  18. E. Knauss and C. El Boustani, “Assessing the quality of software requirements specifications,” in Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, (RE '08), pp. 341–342, Catalunya, Spain, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. Firesmith, “Specifying good requirements,” Journal of Object Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 77–87, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. Winbladh, H. Ziv, and D. J. Richardson, “Eliciting required characteristics for usable requirements engineering approaches,” in 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, (SAC '09), pp. 360–364, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, March 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. G. Hopkins, A New View of Statistics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2001.
  22. M. Svahnberg, A. Aurum, and C. Wohlin, “Using students as subjects—an empirical evaluation,” in Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 288–290, ACM, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 2008.