Clinical Study
Vaginal Flatus and the Associated Risk Factors in Iranian Women: A Main Research Article
Table 1
Distribution of demographic data in the study group.
| | With vaginal flatus | Without vaginal flatus | P value |
| Total Number | 188 (20%) | 754 (80%) | — | With embarrassment: | 54 (5.7%) | | | Age | 34 ± 10.8 | 37 ± 12.4 | <0.0001 | Parity | 2.5 ± 2.15 | 2.6 ± 2.14 | 0.368 | No prolapse | 43 (23%) | 147 (19.5%) | | Pelvic prolapse grade = 1 | 84/188 (45%) | 164/754 (22%) | | Pelvic prolapse grade = 2 | 38/188 (20%) | 171/754 (23%) | <0.0001 | Pelvic prolapse grade ≥ 3 | 23/188 (12%) | 272/754 (36%) | | BMI (kg/m2) | 24.6 ± 4.4 | 25.9 ± 3.7 | | Marital status | | | | Virgin | 8 (4%) | 68 (12% ) | >0.0001 | Married | 168 (89%) | 592 (78.5%) | Divorced or widow | 12 (6%) | 94 (12% ) | Kind of prior delivery | | | | Vaginal delivery | 134 (71%) | 392 (52% ) | >0.0001 | Cesarean section | 30 (16%) | 123 (16%) | Both of them | 8 (4%) | 42 (6%) | Others: virgin, abortion, nulipar | 16 (8.5%) | 227 (30% ) | Menopause | 37 (20% ) | 118 (16%) | — | Largest baby (kg) | 3.3 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 0.032 |
|
|