A Comparative Evaluation of a Mesoscale Model and Atmospheric Global Circulation Model for Air Quality Simulation: A Multiscale, Multisite Evaluation

<table class="table-group" id="tab2"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left" rowspan="2">Vehicle type</td><td align="center" colspan="4">
								Emission rate (<svg height="14.2375" id="M1" style="vertical-align:-3.13504pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 20 14.2375" width="20" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,14.2375)">
<g transform="translate(72,-60.61)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.79)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝐸</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-63.02,60.66)">
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="0" y="0">𝑅</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>) of pollutants in gm/km by different vehicles</td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="center">Two wheeler</td><td align="center">Diesel car</td><td align="center">Petrol car</td><td align="center">Heavy vehicles</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">SPM</td><td align="center">0.2</td><td align="center">2.0</td><td align="center">0.33</td><td align="center">3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="left">RSPM</td><td align="center">0.2</td><td align="center">2.0</td><td align="center">0.33</td><td align="center">3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="left"><span style="width: 26.737499px;"><svg height="14.7" id="M2" style="vertical-align:-3.21404pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 26.737499 14.7" width="26.737499" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,14.7)">
<g transform="translate(72,-60.24)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">S</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="6.9516678" y="0">O</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-55.97,60.37)">
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="0" y="0">𝑥</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg></span></td><td align="center">0.02</td><td align="center">0.39</td><td align="center">0.08</td><td align="center">1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="left"><span style="width: 29.174999px;"><svg height="14.7" id="M3" style="vertical-align:-3.21404pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 29.174999 14.7" width="29.174999" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,14.7)">
<g transform="translate(72,-60.24)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.5)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">N</tspan>
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="8.9021358" y="0">O</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-54.02,60.37)">
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="0" y="0">𝑥</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg></span></td><td align="center">0.07</td><td align="center">       0.99</td><td align="center">3.2</td><td align="center">2.1</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="5"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Data on vehicular sources [<a href="/journals/isrn/2012/826074/#B11">9</a>].

International Scholarly Research Notices

tab2

Table 2

Table 2: A Comparative Evaluation of a Mesoscale Model and Atmospheric Global Circulation Model for Air Quality Simulation: A Multiscale, Multisite Evaluation 

Table 2 | A Comparative Evaluation of a Mesoscale Model and Atmospheric Global Circulation Model for Air Quality Simulation: A Multiscale, Multisite Evaluation 