Table of Contents
ISRN Education
Volume 2012, Article ID 853460, 6 pages
Research Article

Incidental and Intentional Instruction on Discussion Techniques: Assessing Complexity Issue

1The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia
2University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3English Teaching Department, Islamic Azad University of Karaj, Karaj, Iran

Received 21 December 2011; Accepted 12 February 2012

Academic Editors: B. W. Baldwin, C. Dunst, and Y. Xie

Copyright © 2012 Massoud Rahimpour and Zohre Mohamadi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Ellis, The Study of Second Language Acquisition, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 1994.
  2. R. Ellis and G. Barkhuizen, Analyzing Learner Language, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 2005.
  3. R. Ellis, “The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials,” English Language Teaching Journal, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  4. R. Ellis, “Task- based research and language pedagogy,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 193–220, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Ellis, Task- Based Language Teaching and Learning, Oxford University press, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 2003.
  6. M. Bygate, “Task as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language,” System, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Bygate, “Quality of language and purpose of task: patterns of learner's language on two oral communication tasks,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 185–214, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. Ellis, “Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language,” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 27, pp. 141–172, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  9. C. Doughty and T. Pica, “Information gap tasks: do they facilitate second language acquisition?” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 305–335, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  10. R. Ellis, H. Basturkmen, and S. Loewen, “Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons,” Language Learning, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 281–318, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Nakahama, L. van Lier, and A. Tyler, “Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: a comparative discourse analysis,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 377–405, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Branden, “Effects of negotiation on language learners' output,” Language Learning, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 589–636, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Z. Dornyei and J. Kormos, “The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance,” Language Teaching Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 275–300, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. D. Nunan, Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  15. D. Nunan, Second Language Teaching and Learning, Heinle & Heinle, Boston, Mass, USA, 1999.
  16. R. Ellis, Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching, Multilingual Matters, 2009.
  17. H. Farhady, Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, Payame Noor University Press, Tehran, Iran, 1999.