Table of Contents
ISRN Education
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 912783, 7 pages
Research Article

Taiwan Junior High School Adolescents’ Epistemological Beliefs toward Mathematics and Science

1Taoyuan Tzu-Chiang Junior High School, No. 80, Rongmin Road, Taoyuan County, Zhongli City 32073, Taiwan
2Graduate School of Education, Chung Yuan Christian University, No. 200, Chung-Pei Road, Chung-Li 32023, Taiwan

Received 21 December 2011; Accepted 17 January 2012

Academic Editors: M. Platsidou and B. K. Smith

Copyright © 2012 Chun-Yi Lee and Yuan Yuan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. K. Hofer, “Personal epistemology research: implications for learning and teaching,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 353–383, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. B. K. Hofer, “Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom contexts: student interpretations during the first year of college,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 129–163, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. R. A. Duschl, Restructuring Science Education, Teachers College Press, New York, NY, USA, 1990.
  4. P. O. Eynde, E. De Corte, and L. Verschaffel, “Epistemic dimensions of students' mathematics-related belief systems,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 45, no. 1-2, pp. 57–70, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. N. G. Lederman and M. O’Malley, “Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: development, use, and sources of change,” Science Education, vol. 74, pp. 225–239, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  6. C. C. Tsai, “Biological knowledge is more tentative than physics knowledge: Taiwan high school adolescents' views about the nature of biology and physics,” Adolescence, vol. 41, no. 164, pp. 691–703, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. H. Schoenfeld, “Beyond the purely cognitive: belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance,” Cognitive Science, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 329–363, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  8. J. Garofalo, “Beliefs and their influence on mathematical performance,” Mathematics Teacher, vol. 82, pp. 502–505, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  9. E. A. Silver, “Research in teaching mathematical problem solving: some underrepresented themes and directions,” in Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspectives, E. A. Silver, Ed., pp. 247–266, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Lampert, “When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: mathematical knowing and teaching,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 27, pp. 29–63, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  11. P. Kloosterman, “Self-confidence and motivation in mathematics,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 345–351, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Malmivuori and E. Pehkonen, “Mathematical beliefs behind school performances,” in Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, E. Pehkonen and M. I. Neuvonen-Rauhla, Eds., pp. 305–311, PME Program Committee Publisher, Lathi, India, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. K. Gfeller, M. L. Niess, and N. G. Lederman, “High school epistemological views of mathematics,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, La, USA, 2000.
  14. D. Urhahne, K. Kremer, and J. Mayer, “Conceptions of the nature of science—are they general or context specific?” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 707–730, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Windschitl and T. Andre, “Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: the roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 145–160, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  16. W. A. Sandoval, “Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry,” Science Education, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 634–656, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. L. Barnard, W. Y. Lan, S. M. Crooks, and V. O. Paton, “The relationship between epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning skills in the online course environment,” Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 261–266, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  18. H. K. Wu and C. L. Wu, “Exploring the development of fifth graders' practical epistemologies and explanation skills in inquiry-based learning classrooms,” Research in Science Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. L. Mason, “High school students' beliefs about maths, mathematical problem solving, and their achievement in maths: a cross-sectional study,” Educational Psychology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 73–85, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. N. G. Lederman and M. L. Niess, “5 apples + 4 oranges = ?” School Science and Mathematics, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 281–284, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  21. D. F. Berlin and A. L. White, “Preservice mathematics and science teachers in an integrated teacher preparation program for grades 7–12: a 3-year study of attitudes and perceptions related to integration,” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 97–115, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. N. G. Lederman, “Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 29, pp. 331–359, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  23. H. Forgasz, “Girls’ attitudes in mixed and single-sex mathematics classrooms,” in Gender and Mathematics Education: An ICMI Study in Stiftsgarden, Akdersberg, Hoor, Sweden, 1993, B. Grevholm and G. Hanna, Eds., pp. 167–178, Lund University Press, Lund, Sweden, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. B. Kahle and J. Meece, “Research on gender issues in the classroom,” in Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, D. L. Gabel, Ed., pp. 542–557, Macmillan, New York, NY, USA, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  25. C. Y. Lee and Y. Yuan, “Gender differences in the relationship between Taiwanese adolescents' mathematics attitudes and perceptions toward virtual manipulatives,” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 937–950, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. C. Frenzel, R. Pekrun, and T. Goetz, “Girls and mathematics—a “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics,” European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 497–514, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  27. J. Kenway and A. Gough, “Gender and science education in schools: a review with attitude,” Studies in Science Education, vol. 31, pp. 1–30, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  28. M. L. Trankina, “Gender differences in attitudes toward science,” Psychological Reports, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 123–130, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  29. S. E. Nichols, P. J. Gilmer, A. D. Thompson, and N. Davis, “Women in science: expanding the vision,” in International Handbook of Science Education, B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin, Eds., pp. 967–978, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  30. E. Anderson, “Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,” 2003, View at Google Scholar
  31. F. Y. Yang and C. C. Chang, “Examining high-school students' preferences toward learning environments, personal beliefs and concept learning in web-based contexts,” Computers and Education, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 848–857, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. M. Schommer-Aikins, “An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system,” in Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing, B. Hofer and P. Pintrich, Eds., pp. 103–118, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  33. M. M. Buehl, P. A. Alexander, and P. K. Murphy, “Beliefs about schooled knowledge: domain specific or domain general?” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 415–449, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. G. C. Leder, “Teacher/student interactions in the mathematics classroom: a different perspective,” in Mathematics and Gender, E. Fennema and G. Leder, Eds., pp. 149–168, Queensland University Press, Bribane, Australia, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  35. K. R. Muis, “Personal epistemology and mathematics: a critical review and synthesis of research,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 317–377, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. H. Schoenfeld, “When good teaching leads to bad results: the disasters of “well-taught” mathematics classes,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 23, pp. 145–166, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  37. M. C. Linn and B. S. Eylon, “Knowledge integration and displaced volume,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 287–310, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  38. C. C. Tsai, “An analysis of Taiwanese eighth graders' science achievement, scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structure outcomes after learning basic atomic theory,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 413–425, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  39. F. Abd-El-Khalick and N. G. Lederman, “Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 665–701, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  40. M. S. Jensen and F. N. Finley, “Teaching evolution using a historically rich curriculum and paired problem solving instructional strategy,” American Biology Teacher, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 208–212, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  41. C. Y. Lee and M. P. Chen, “Bridging the gap between mathematical conjecture and proof through computer-supported cognitive conflicts,” Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. C. Y. Lee and M. P. Chen, “A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: the effects of type of question prompt and level of prior knowledge,” Computers and Education, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 530–542, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. Y. Yuan, C. Y. Lee, and C. H. Wang, “A comparison study of polyominoes explorations in a physical and virtual manipulative environment,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 307–316, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. W. L. Chang, Y. Yuan, C. Y. Lee, M. H. Chen, and W. G. Huang, “Exploring the imapct of using Magic Board as a teaching aid in third grader learning of area concepts,” Educational Technology and Society. In press.
  45. D. Kember, “Beliefs about knowledge and the process of teaching and learning as a factor in adjusting to study in higher education,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 205–221, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  46. M. Schommer-Aikins and M. Easter, “Ways of knowing and epistemological beliefs: combined effect on academic performance,” Educational Psychology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 411–423, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. A. K. Y. Wong, K. W. Chan, and P. Y. Lai, “Revisiting the relationships of epistemological beliefs and conceptions about teaching and learning of pre-service teachers in Hong Kong,” Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2009. View at Google Scholar