Table of Contents
ISRN Ecology
Volume 2012, Article ID 945209, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/945209
Research Article

Testing the Ideal Free Distribution Hypothesis: Moose Response to Changes in Habitat Amount

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4

Received 3 October 2011; Accepted 23 October 2011

Academic Editor: J. M. Witte

Copyright © 2012 Abbie Stewart and Petr E. Komers. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. D. Fretwell and H. L. Lucas, “On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds,” Acta Biotheoretica, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 16–36, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Bernstein, A. Kacelnik, and J. R. Krebs, “Individual decisions and the distribution of predators in a patchy environment. II. The influence of travel costs and structure of the environment,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 205–225, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. J. Gustafson and G. R. Parker, “Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern,” Landscape Ecology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. D. Hargis, J. A. Bissonette, and J. L. David, “The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation,” Landscape Ecology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 167–186, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Tischendorf, “Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently?” Landscape Ecology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235–254, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. C. Neel, K. McGarigal, and S. A. Cushman, “Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area,” Landscape Ecology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 435–455, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Bascompte and R. V. Solé, “Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds in spatially explicit models,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 465–473, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. J. Gustafson, “Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art?” Ecosystems, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 143–156, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Wu Jianguo and O. L. Loucks, “From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology,” Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 439–466, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Andren, “Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review,” Oikos, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 355–366, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. A. Shipley and D. E. Spalinger, “Influence of size and density of browse patches on intake rates and foraging decisions of young moose and white-tailed deer,” Oecologia, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 112–121, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Bogaert, P. Van Hecke, D. Salvador-Van Eysenrode, and I. Impens, “Landscape fragmentation assessment using a single measure,” Wildlife Society Bulletin, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 875–881, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. M. Lord and D. A. Norton, “Scale and the spatial concept of fragmentation,” Conservation Biology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Opdam, R. Foppen, R. Reijnen, and A. Schotman, “The landscape ecological approach in bird conservation: integrating the metapopulation concept into spatial planning,” Ibis, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 139–146, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Mysterud and R. A. Ims, “Functional responses in habitat use: availability influences relative use in trade-off situations,” Ecology, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1435–1441, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Haila, “A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology,” Ecological Applications, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 321–334, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Brotons, A. Wolff, G. Paulus, and J. L. Martin, “Effect of adjacent agricultural habitat on the distribution of passerines in natural grasslands,” Biological Conservation, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 407–414, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Stewart, P. E. Komers, and D. J. Bender, “Assessing landscape relationships for habitat generalists,” Ecoscience, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. J. P. W. W. Downing, Natural Regions and Subregions of Alberta, Publication No. T/852, Natural Regions Committee, Government of Alberta, 2006.
  20. W. L. Strong, Ecoregions and Ecodistricts of Alberta, lberta Forestry, Lands and Wildlife, Edmonton, Canada, 1992.
  21. J. D. Beckingham, I. G. W. Corns, and J. H. Archibald, Field Guide to Ecosites of West-Central Alberta, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Canada, 1996.
  22. P. J. Murphy, R. Udell, R. E. Stevenson, and R. Bott, The Hinton Forest 1955–2000. A Case Study in Adaptive Forest Management, The Weldwood-Hinton Story, Foothills Model Forest, 2002.
  23. Foothills Model Forest, “Foothills Model Forest: research growing into practice,” 2007, http://www.fmf.ca/.
  24. S. E. Nielsen, R. H. M. Munro, and M. S. Boyce, “Modeling grizzly bear activity by time of day and habitat in west-central Alberta,” in Foothills Model Forest Grizzly Bear Research Program 2005 Annual Report, G. Stenhouse and K. Graham, Eds., Hinton, Alberta, Canada, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  25. AltaLIS, “AltaLIS: Digital Mapping for Alberta,” 2007, http://altalis.com/.
  26. C. Laurian, J. P. Ouellet, R. Courtois, L. Breton, and S. St-Onge, “Effects of intensive harvesting on moose reproduction,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 515–531, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. W. R. Mytton and L. B. Keith, “Dynamics of moose populations near Rochester, Alberta, 1975–1978,” Canadian Field Naturalist, vol. 95, pp. 39–49, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  28. F. Van Dyke, B. L. Probert, and G. M. Van Beek, “Moose home range fidelity and core area characteristics in south-central Montana,” Alces, vol. 31, pp. 91–104, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  29. D. J. Neff, “The pellet-group count technique for big game trend, census, and distribution: a review,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 597–614, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  30. D. J. Augustine and L. E. Frelich, “Effects of white-tailed deer on populations of an understory forb in fragmented deciduous forests,” Conservation Biology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 995–1004, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. F. W. Weckerly and M. A. Ricca, “Using presence of sign to measure habitats used by Roosevelt elk,” Wildlife Society Bulletin, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 146–153, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. L. Strong and D. J. Freddy, “Number of pellets per mule deer defecation,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 563–564, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  33. S. Härkönen and R. Heikkilä, “Use of pellet group counts in determining density and habitat use of moose Alces alces in Finland,” Wildlife Biology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 233–239, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. L. Cairns and E. S. Telfer, “Habitat use by 4 sympatric ungulates in boreal mixedwood forest,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 849–857, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  35. A. W. Franzman, J. L. Oldemeyer, P. D. Arneson, and R. K. Seemel, “Pellet-group count evaluation for census and habitat use of Alaskan moose,” in Proceedings of the North American Moose Conference and Workshop, vol. 12, pp. 127–142, 1976.
  36. Systat Software Inc., “Systat 11.00,” no. release 11.00, Systat Software Inc, 2004.
  37. Environmental Systems Research Institute, “ArcGIS v.9.3.1,” no. 9.3.1, Redlands, Calif, USA, 2009.
  38. K. McGarigal and B. J. Marks, “FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure,” USDA Forest Service General Technical Report in Forest Sciences, vol. PNW-351, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Neter, M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman, Applied Linear Statistical Models, WCB McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass, USA, 1996.
  40. ASRD, “Hunting in Alberta,” 2007, http://www.srd.gov.ab.ca/.
  41. J. D. Toms and M. L. Lesperance, “Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds,” Ecology, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 2034–2041, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson, Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  43. K. R. Searle, N. T. Hobbs, and L. A. Shipley, “Should I stay or should I go? Patch departure decisions by herbivores at multiple scales,” Oikos, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 417–424, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. F. Matter, “The importance of the relationship between population density and habitat area,” Oikos, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 613–619, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus