Research Article
Behaviour and Optimization Aids of Composite Stiffened Hypar Shell Roofs with Cutout under Free Vibration
Table 5
Clamping options for 0/90/0/90 hypar shells with central cutouts having ratio 0.2.
| Number of sides to be clamped | Clamped edges | Improvement of frequencies with respect to simply supported shells | Marks indicating the efficiencies of clamping |
| 0 | Simply supported no edges clamped (SSSS) | — | 0 |
| 1 | (a) Along (CSSS) | Good improvement | 21 | (b) Along (SSCS) | Good improvement | 21 | (c) Along (SSSC) | Good improvement | 21 |
| 2 | (a) Two alternate edges (CSCS, SCSC) | Very good improvement | 51 | (b) Two adjacent edges (CSSC, CCSS) | Marked improvement | 71 |
| 3 | 3 edges excluding CSCC | Remarkable improvement and frequency becomes almost equal to that of fully clamped shells | 85 | 3 edges excluding CCSC | 85 | 3 edges excluding CCCS | 85 |
| 4 | All sides (CCCC) | Frequency attains a maximum value | 100 |
|
|