Comparison between Intravitreal Triamcinolone with Grid Laser Photocoagulation versus Bevacizumab with Grid Laser Photocoagulation Combinations for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Table 2
The mean visual acuity levels and the change in visual in the study groups at different time points.
IVT + GLP
IVB + GLP
P values*
Baseline BCVA (LogMAR)
Month 3 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 3 P value
P = 0.006
P = 0.007
Month 6 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 6 P value
P = 0.01
P = 0.01
Month 9 BCVA
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 9 P value
P = 0.02
P = 0.03
Month 12 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 12 P value
P = 0.03
P = 0.04
Month 15 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 15 P value
P = 0.04
P = 0.03
Month 18 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 18 P value
P = 0.03
P = 0.03
Month 21 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 21 P value
P = 0.03
P = 0.01
Month 24 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 24 P value
P = 0.03
P = 0.02
for baseline visual acuity, P values for IVT versus IVB are for the baseline values themselves; the other P values are for the change achieved with the two drugs relative to the baseline values. BCVA: best corrected visual acuity; LogMAR: logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution; IVT: intravitreal triamcinolone; GLP: grid laser photocoagulation; IVB: intravitreal bevacizumab; P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.