Clinical Study

Comparison between Intravitreal Triamcinolone with Grid Laser Photocoagulation versus Bevacizumab with Grid Laser Photocoagulation Combinations for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Table 2

The mean visual acuity levels and the change in visual in the study groups at different time points.

IVT + GLPIVB + GLPP values*

Baseline BCVA (LogMAR)

Month 3 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 3 P valueP = 0.006 P = 0.007

Month 6 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 6 P valueP = 0.01 P = 0.01

Month 9 BCVA
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 9 P valueP = 0.02 P = 0.03

Month 12 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 12 P valueP = 0.03 P = 0.04

Month 15 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 15 P valueP = 0.04 P = 0.03

Month 18 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 18 P valueP = 0.03 P = 0.03

Month 21 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 21 P valueP = 0.03 P = 0.01

Month 24 BCVA (LogMAR)
Mean change from baseline (LogMAR)
Baseline versus month 24 P valueP = 0.03 P = 0.02

for baseline visual acuity, P values for IVT versus IVB are for the baseline values themselves; the other P values are for the change achieved with the two drugs relative to the baseline values. BCVA: best corrected visual acuity; LogMAR: logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution; IVT: intravitreal triamcinolone; GLP: grid laser photocoagulation; IVB: intravitreal bevacizumab; P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.