Table of Contents
ISRN Applied Mathematics
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 146026, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/146026
Research Article

Hybrid Multiattribute Group Decision Making Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information and GRA Method

School of Management Science and Engineering, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China

Received 14 May 2013; Accepted 30 July 2013

Academic Editors: M.-H. Hsu and T. Y. Kam

Copyright © 2013 Jian Guo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z. S. XU, Uncertain Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China, 2004, Chinese.
  2. Y. Q. Xia and Q. Z. Wu, “A technique of order preference by similarity to ideal solution for hybrid multiple attribute decision making problems,” Journal of Systems Engineering, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 630–634, 2004 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  3. C.-M. Ding, F. Li, and H. Qi, “Technique of hybrid multiple attribute decision making based on similarity degree to ideal solution,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 737–740, 2007 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  4. W. Wang and M. Cui, “Hybrid multiple attribute decision making model based on entropy,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 72–75, 2007 (Chinese). View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Theory and Applications, vol. 35, Physica, Heidelberg, Germany, 1999. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. K. T. Atanassov, “More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. K. T. Atanassov, “New operations defined over the intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 137–142, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. K. T. Atanassov, “Two theorems for intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 267–269, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Computation, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. K. Atanassov, G. Pasi, and R. Yager, “Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-criteria multi-person and multi-measurement tool decision making,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 36, no. 14, pp. 859–868, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. D.-F. Li, “Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 73–85, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  13. H.-W. Liu and G.-J. Wang, “Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 220–233, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  14. L. Lin, X.-H. Yuan, and Z.-Q. Xia, “Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 84–88, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. Z. Xu, “Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 11, pp. 2363–2379, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, “Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decison making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 246–262, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. F. E. Boran, S. Genc, M. Kurt, and D. Akay, “A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 11363–11368, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Ye, “Fuzzy decision making method based on the weighted correlation coefficient under intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 202–204, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  19. S. F. Zhang and S. Y. Liu, “A GRA-based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for personnel selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 11401–11405, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. H. Park, I. Y. Park, Y. C. Kwun, and X. Tan, “Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision making problems under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2544–2556, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. S. K. De, R. Biswas, and A. R. Roy, “An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 209–213, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  22. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in some medical applications,” in Computational Intelligence. Theory and Applications, vol. 2206 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 148–151, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  23. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “A similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in supporting medical diagnostic reasoning,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC '04), vol. 3070 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 388–393, June 2004. View at Scopus
  24. L. Dengfeng and C. Chuntian, “New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 23, no. 1–3, pp. 221–225, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  25. Z. Liang and P. Shi, “Similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 2687–2693, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  26. W.-L. Hung and M.-S. Yang, “Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 25, no. 14, pp. 1603–1611, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. W. Wang and X. Xin, “Distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 2063–2069, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. Zhang and H. Fu, “Similarity measures on three kinds of fuzzy sets,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1307–1317, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. I. K. Vlachos and G. D. Sergiadis, “Intuitionistic fuzzy information—applications to pattern recognition,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 197–206, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Z. Xu, J. Chen, and J. Wu, “Clustering algorithm for intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 19, pp. 3775–3790, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. K. Atanassov and G. Gargov, “Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 343–349, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  32. K. T. Atanassov, “Operators over interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 159–174, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  33. P. Burillo and H. Bustince, “Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and on interval-valued fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 305–316, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  34. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 467–477, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  35. X. D. Liu, S. H. Zheng, and F. L. Xiong, “Entropy and subsethood for general interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” in Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 3613 of Lecture Notes on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 42–52, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  36. W.-L. Hung and M.-S. Yang, “Fuzzy entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 443–451, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  37. Y. Wang and Y.-J. Lei, “A technique for constructing intuitionistic fuzzy entropy,” Control and Decision, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1390–1394, 2007 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  38. W. Zeng, F. Yu, X. Yu, and B. Cui, “Entropy of intuitionistic fuzzy set based on similarity measure,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Innovative Computing Information and Control (ICICIC '08), vol. 254, p. 398, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. Zhang, W. Zhang, and C. Mei, “Entropy of interval-valued fuzzy sets based on distance and its relationship with similarity measure,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 449–454, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Q.-S. Zhang and S.-Y. Jiang, “A note on information entropy measures for vague sets and its applications,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 21, pp. 4184–4191, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  41. Q.-S. Zhang, S. Jiang, B. Jia, and S. Luo, “Some information measures for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 24, pp. 5130–5145, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  42. T.-Y. Chen and C.-H. Li, “Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: a comparative analysis,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 21, pp. 4207–4222, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C.-P. Wei, P. Wang, and Y.-Z. Zhang, “Entropy, similarity measure of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 19, pp. 4273–4286, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  44. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 505–518, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  45. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “A new concept of a similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its use in group decision making,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3558, pp. 272–282, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  46. Z. Xu, “Some similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 109–121, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  47. W. Zeng and H. Li, “Relationship between similarity measure and entropy of interval valued fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 157, no. 11, pp. 1477–1484, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  48. S. M. Chen and J. M. Tan, “Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 163–172, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  49. D. H. Hong and C.-H. Choi, “Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 103–113, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  50. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “A new approach to ranking alternatives expressed via intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” in Computational Intelligence in Decision and Control, D. Ruan et al., Ed., pp. 265–270, World Scientific, Singapore, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  51. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “Amount of information and its reliability in the ranking of Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy alternatives,” in Recent Advances in Decision Making, E. Rakus-Andersson, R. R. Yager, and N. Ichalkaranje, Eds., vol. 222, pp. 7–19, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  52. Z. Wang, K. W. Li, and W. Wang, “An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 17, pp. 3026–3040, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  53. Z. Xu, “A method based on distance measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 181–190, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  54. Z. Xu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1179–1187, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. Z.-S. Xu, “Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making,” Control and Decision, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 215–219, 2007 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. Z. Xu and J. Chen, “On geometric aggregation over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD '07), pp. 466–471, Haikou, China, August 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, “Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 417–433, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  58. C. Y. Liang, J. Wu, W. X. Lu, and Y. Ding, “A new method on hybrid multiple attribute decision making problem for choosing the supplier,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 71–76, 2006 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  59. F. Herrera, L. Martínez, and P. J. Sánchez, “Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 115–132, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  60. L. Martínez, J. Liu, D. Ruan, and J.-B. Yang, “Dealing with heterogeneous information in engineering evaluation processes,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 7, pp. 1533–1542, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. Y.-J. Si and F.-J. Wei, “Hybrid multi-attribute decision making based on the intuitionistic fuzzy optimum selecting model,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 2893–2897, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. C. Y. Liang, E. Q. Zhang, X. W. Qing, and Q. Lu, “A method of multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete hybrid assessment information,” Chinese Journal of Management Science, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 126–132, 2009 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  63. K. Guo and W. Li, “An attitudinal-based method for constructing intuitionistic fuzzy information in hybrid MADM under uncertainty,” Information Sciences, vol. 208, no. 15, pp. 28–38, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  64. X.-W. Chen, W.-S. Wang, G.-B. Song, and D.-Y. Song, “Hybrid multiattribute decision making based on fuzzy preference relation,” Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 529–533, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  65. J. L. Deng, “Introduction to grey system theory,” The Journal of Grey System, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  66. G.-W. Wei, “GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 243–247, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. G.-W. Wei, “Gray relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 11671–11677, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. M.-S. Kuo and G.-S. Liang, “Combining VIKOR with GRA techniques to evaluate service quality of airports under fuzzy environment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1304–1312, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. L. A. Zadeh, “Probability measures of fuzzy events,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 23, pp. 421–427, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  70. A. de Luca and S. Termini, “A definition of a nonprobabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy sets theory,” Information and Computation, vol. 20, pp. 301–312, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  71. M. Delgado, J. L. Verdegay, and M. A. Vila, “Linguistic decision-making models,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 479–492, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  72. V.-N. Huynh and Y. Nakamori, “A satisfactory-oriented approach to multiexpert decision-making with linguistic assessments,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 184–196, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus