Table of Contents
ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2013, Article ID 173278, 5 pages
Clinical Study

Effectiveness of a Novel Device in the Reduction of Cesarean Deliveries

Chief of Obstetrics, Niagara Falls Memorial Medical Center, 621 10th Street Hodge 3, Niagara Falls, NY 14301, USA

Received 17 June 2013; Accepted 31 July 2013

Academic Editors: M. Friedrich and M. Kühnert

Copyright © 2013 Daniel A. Burns. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. MacDorman, E. Declercq, and F. Menacker, “Recent trends and patterns in vaginal birth after cesarean (VBCA) deliveries in the United States,” Clinics in Perinatology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 179–192, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. E. Hamilton, J. A. Martin, and S. J. Ventura, “Births: preliminary data for 2011,” US Department of Health and Human Services. National Center For Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1–20, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. W. Branch and R. M. Silver, “Managing the primary cesarean delivery rate,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 946–960, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  4. K. N. Solheim, T. F. Esakoff, S. E. Little, Y. W. Cheng, T. N. Sparks, and A. B. Caughey, “The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1341–1346, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Cheng, J. Nicholson, B. Shaffer, D. Lyell, and A. Caughey, “The second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously thought,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, supplement S46, 2009. View at Google Scholar