Table of Contents
ISRN Education
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 196014, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/196014
Review Article

Exploring Epistemological Trends in Students’ Understanding of Science from the Perspective of Large-Scale Studies

1Learning and Society, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden
2Teacher Education, Mid Sweden University, 871 88 Härnösand, Sweden

Received 13 February 2013; Accepted 12 March 2013

Academic Editors: M. Martin, G. Velan, and J. Widera

Copyright © 2013 Anders Jakobsson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. OECD, Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: A New Framework For Assessment, OECD Publications, Paris, France, 1999.
  2. OECD, PISA, 2003 Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills, OECD Publications, Paris, France, 2003.
  3. OECD, Executive Summary PISA, 2006: Science Competencies For Tomorrow’s World, OECD Publications, Paris, France, 2007.
  4. A. Jakobsson, R. Säljö, and Å. Mäkitalo, “Conceptions of knowledge in research on students. Understanding of the greenhouse effect: methodological positions and their consequences for representations of knowing,” Science Education, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 978–995, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Brunner, C. Artelt, S. Krauss, and J. Baumert, “Coaching for the PISA test,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 111–122, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. OECD, Learning for Tomorrow’s World. First Results from PISA 2003, OECD Publications, Paris, France, 2004.
  7. S. Sjøberg, “PISA and “Real Life Challenges” : mission impossible?” in PISA According To PISA: Does PISA Keep What It Promises? T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, and M. Retzl, Eds., pp. 203–224, LIT, Wien, Vienna, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. Bautier and P. Rayou, “What PISA really evaluates: literacy or students' universes of reference?” Journal of Educational Change, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 359–364, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Olsen, “An exploration of cluster structure in scientific literacy in PISA: evidence for a Nordic dimension?” Nordic Studies of Science Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Puchhammer, “Language-based item analysis—problems in intercultural comparisons,” in PISA According to PISA: Does PISA Keep What It Promises? T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, and M. Retzl, Eds., pp. 127–138, LIT, Wien, Vienna, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  11. N. Bottani and P. Vrignaud, La France Et Les Évaluations internationaLes. National Report To the HCEE, HCEE, Paris, France, 2005.
  12. P. J. Fensham, “Real world contexts in PISA science: implications for context-based science education,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 884–896, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Klette, S. Lie, M. Ødegaard et al., Prosjekt om Lærings- og Undervisnings-Strategier i Skolen [Project about Learning and Educational Strategies in Schools], Forskningsrådet, Oslo, Norway, 2008.
  14. D. A. Roberts, “Developing the concepts of “curriculum emphases” in science education,” Science Education, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 243–260, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  15. D. A. Roberts, “Promoting scientific literacy: science education research in transition,” in Proceedings of the Linnaues Tercentenary Symposium, C. Linder, L. Östman, and P.-O. Wickman, Eds., pp. 9–17, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 2007, Linné Scientific Literacy Symposium Opening Re-marks.
  16. OECD, Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework For PISA 2006, OECD Publications, Paris, France, 2006.
  17. S. Grek, “Governing by numbers: the PISA “effect” in Europe,” Journal of Education Policy, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 23–37, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Wuttke, “Fehler, Verzerrungen, Unsicherheiten in der PISA Auswertung [Mistakes, biases, uncertainties in the PISA analysis],” in PISA & Co: Kritik Eines Programms [PISA & Co: Critique of A programme], T. Jahnke and W. Meyerhöfers, Eds., pp. 101–154, Berlin, Germany, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  19. SOU, “En hållbar lärarutbildning [A Sustainable Teacher Education],” SOU: 109, Statens offentliga utredningar, Ministry of Education in Sweden, 2008.
  20. M. Uljens, “The hidden curriculum of PISA—the promotion of neo-liberal policy by educational assessment,” in PISA According To PISA: Does PISA Keep What It Promises? T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, and M. Retzl, Eds., pp. 295–304, LIT, Wien, Vienna, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  21. T. Hopmann and G. Brinek, “PISA according to PISA: does PISA keep what it promises?” in PISA According To PISA: Does PISA Keep What It Promises? T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, and M. Retzl, Eds., pp. 9–20, LIT, Wien, Vienna, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  22. H. Goldstein, “International comparisons of student attainment: some issues arising from the PISA study,” Assessment in Education, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 319–330, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Fertig, “What can we learn from international student performance studies—some methodological remarks,” Discussion Paper 23, RWI, Essen, Germany, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  24. P. Allerup, “Identification of group differences using PISA scales—considering effects of inhomogeneous items,” in TPISA According To PISA: Does PISA Keep What It Promises? T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, and M. Retzl, Eds., pp. 175–202, LIT, Wien, Vienna, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  25. P. Lietz, “A meta-analysis of gender differences in reading achievement at secondary school level,” Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 317–344, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Kjærnsli and S. Lie, “PISA and scientific literacy: similarities and differences between the Nordic countries,” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 271–286, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Lavonen, S. Lie, A. Macdonald, M. Oscarsson, C. Reistrup, and H. Sørensen, “Science education, the science curriculum and PISA,” in Northern Lights on PISA, 2006: Differences and Similarities in the Nordic Countries, T. Matti, Ed., vol. 547, pp. 31–58, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  28. M. Kjærnsli and S. Lie, “Students' preference for science careers: International comparisons based on PISA 2006,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 121–144, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. V. Olsen and S. Lie, “Profiles of students' interest in science issues around the world: analysis of data from PISA 2006,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 97–120, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. Bonnet, “Reflections in a critical eye: on the pitfalls of international assessment,” Assessment in Education, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 387–399, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  31. P. Mortimore, “Alternative models for analysing and representing countries’ performance in PISA,” Paper commissioned by Education International Research Institute, Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
  32. U. P. Lundgren, “PISA as a political instrument—one history behind the formulating of the PISA programme,” in PISA Under Examination—Changing Knowledge, Changing Tests, and Changing Schools, M. Pereyra, H.-G. Kotthoff, and R. Cowen, Eds., pp. 17–30, Sense, The Netherlands, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  33. OECD, PISA Results 2009. What Students Know and Can Do. Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science, vol. 1, OECD Publications, Paris, France, 2010.
  34. B. K. Hofer, “Personal epistemology research: implications for learning and instruction,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 353–383, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. B. K. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich, Eds., Personal Epistemology: the Psychology of Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1st edition, 2002.
  36. N. G. Lederman, “Nature of science: past, present, and future,” in Handbook of Research in Science Education, S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, Eds., pp. 831–880, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar