Table of Contents
ISRN Radiology
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 235270, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2013/235270
Clinical Study

Volumetric Breast Ultrasound as a Screening Modality in Mammographically Dense Breasts

Breast Cancer Research Institute, Nova Southeastern University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 5732 Canton Cove, Winter Springs, FL 32708, USA

Received 16 August 2012; Accepted 10 September 2012

Academic Editors: J.-B. Dubois and I. El Naqa

Copyright © 2013 Vincenzo Giuliano and Concetta Giuliano. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Whitehead, T. Carlile, and K. J. Kopecky, “Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns. A study of the masking hypothesis of Egan and Mosteller,” Cancer, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1280–1286, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. N. Wolfe, “Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1130–1139, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. N. Wolfe, “Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern,” Cancer, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 2486–2492, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. A. Colditz, W. C. Willett, D. J. Hunter et al., “Family history, age, and risk of breast cancer: prospective data from the Nurses' Health Study,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 270, no. 3, pp. 338–343, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. H. Gail, L. A. Brinton, D. P. Byar et al., “Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 81, no. 24, pp. 1879–1886, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Seidman, S. D. Stellman, and M. H. Mushinski, “A different perspective on breast cancer risk factors: some implications of the nonattributable risk,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 301–313, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Shapiro, W. Venet, P. Strax, L. Venet, and R. Roeser, “Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 349–355, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. T. Mandelson, N. Oestreicher, P. L. Porter et al., “Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 92, no. 13, pp. 1081–1087, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Shtern, “Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute,” Radiology, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 629–630, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. D. Pisano and M. J. Yaffe, “Digital mammography,” Radiology, vol. 234, no. 2, pp. 353–362, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. F. Brem, J. W. Hoffmeister, J. A. Rapelyea et al., “Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 439–444, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. K. Yang, W. K. Moon, N. Cho et al., “Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms,” Radiology, vol. 244, no. 1, pp. 104–111, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. S. The, K. J. Schilling, J. W. Hoffmeister, E. Friedmann, R. McGinnis, and R. G. Holcomb, “Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 337–340, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. F. Brem, J. A. Rapelyea, G. Zisman, J. W. Hoffmeister, and M. P. DeSimio, “Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology,” Cancer, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 931–935, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Malich, D. Sauner, C. Marx et al., “Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system,” Radiology, vol. 228, no. 3, pp. 851–856, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. J. Kim, W. K. Moon, N. Cho et al., “Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations,” Radiology, vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 71–80, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. F. Boyd, H. Guo, L. J. Martin et al., “Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 3, pp. 227–236, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. Buchberger, P. DeKoekkoek-Doll, P. Springer, P. Obrist, and M. Dünser, “Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 173, no. 4, pp. 921–927, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. B. Kopans, “Breast-cancer screening with ultrasonography,” Lancet, vol. 354, no. 9196, pp. 2096–2097, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. W. A. Berg, J. D. Blume, J. B. Cormack et al., “Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 299, no. 18, pp. 2151–2163, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. M. Kelly, J. Dean, W. S. Comulada, and S. J. Lee, “Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts,” European Radiology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 734–742, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. United States Food and Drug Organization, “Breast transilluminators,” 74 FR 16214, April 9, 2009—Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0001, April 12, 2012.
  23. C. D'Orsi, L. Bassett, and W. Berg, ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), American College of Radiology, Reston, Va, USA, 4th edition, 2003.
  24. B. M. Geller, W. E. Barlow, R. Ballard-Barbash et al., “Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease,” Radiology, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 536–542, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. F. Griner, R. J. Mayewski, A. I. Mushlin, and P. Greenland, “Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 555–600, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. A. Hanley and B. J. McNeil, “The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve,” Radiology, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. E. Metz, “Basic principles of ROC analysis,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 283–298, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid 2004 contracted intermediary carrier fee schedule. Published by First Coast Service Options, Inc., 2004.
  29. T. Kuroishi, S. Tominaga, T. Morimoto et al., “Tumor growth rate and prognosis of breast cancer mainly detected by mass screening,” Japanese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 454–462, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. Heuser, J. S. Spratt, and H. C. Polk, “Growth rates of primary breast cancers,” Cancer, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1888–1894, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. S. Michaelson, E. Halpern, and D. B. Kopans, “Breast cancer: computer simulation method for estimating optimal intervals for screening,” Radiology, vol. 212, no. 2, pp. 551–560, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Subramanian, J. Trogdon, D. U. Ekwueme, J. G. Gardner, J. T. Whitmire, and C. Rao, “Cost of breast cancer treatment in medicaid: implications for state programs providing coverage for low-income women,” Medical Care, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. Saslow, C. Boetes, W. Burke et al., “American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 75–89, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. O. Leach, C. R. Boggis, A. K. Dixon et al., “Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS),” Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9473, pp. 1769–1778, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. I. Griebsch, J. Brown, C. Boggis et al., “Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 801–810, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. V. Giuliano and C. Giuliano, “Using automated breast sonography as part of a multimodality approach to dense breast screening,” Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, vol. 28, pp. 159–165, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  37. G. Ursin, H. Ma, A. H. Wu et al., “Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 332–338, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. Byrne, C. Schairer, J. Wolfe et al., “Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 87, no. 21, pp. 1622–1629, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. N. Wolfe, A. F. Saftlas, and M. Salane, “Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 1087–1092, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. N. F. Boyd, B. O'Sullivan, and J. E. Campbell, “Mammographic signs as risk factors for breast cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 185–193, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. F. Saftlas, R. N. Hoover, L. A. Brinton et al., “Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer,” Cancer, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 2833–2838, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. N. Dongola, “Mammography in breast cancer,” 2012, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/346529-overview.