Table of Contents
ISRN Neuroscience
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 261364, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/261364
Review Article

The Mind-Brain Relationship as a Mathematical Problem

Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, 22030-4444 VA, USA

Received 11 February 2013; Accepted 7 March 2013

Academic Editors: J. A. Hinojosa and S. Rampp

Copyright © 2013 Giorgio A. Ascoli. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. G. Weerasinghe, The Sankhya Philosophy; A Critical Evaluation of Its Origins and Development, South Asia Books, New Delhi, India, 1993.
  2. B. Jowett, The Dialogues of Plato Translated into English with Analyses and Introductions in Five Volumes, Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 1892, Chapter: PHAEDO, http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/766/93700.
  3. W. Seager and S. Allen-Hermanson, “Panpsychism,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E. N. Zalta, Ed., 2012, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/panpsychism. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Shuttleworth, “Aristotle’s Psychology,” Experiment Resources, 2012, http://www.experiment-resources.com/aristotles-psychology.html.
  5. G. J. C. Lokhorst and T. T. Kaitaro, “The originality of Descartes' theory about the pineal gland,” Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6–18, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Adams, “Translation of Hippocrates’ “On the Sacred Disease” (University of Adelaide Library, retrieved from Internet Classics Archive,” 2006, http://web.archive.org/web/20070926213032/, http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/mirror/classics.mit.edu/Hippocrates/sacred.html.
  7. V. Nutton, Galen of Pergamum (Encyclopædia Britannica), 2012, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/223895/Galen-of-Pergamum.
  8. E. R. Kandel and L. R. Squire, “Neuroscience: breaking down scientific barriers to the study of brain and mind,” Science, vol. 290, no. 5494, pp. 1113–1120, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. J. Chalmers and D. Bourget, “Consciousness and Neuroscience. In Online Papers on Consciousness,” 2009, http://consc.net/online/8.1.
  10. A. Zeman, “Consciousness,” Brain, vol. 124, no. 7, pp. 1263–1289, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. A. Ascoli and J. Grafman, Eds., Consciousness, Mind and Brain, Massom Publisher, Milan, Italy, 2005.
  12. G. A. Ascoli, “Brain and mind at the crossroad of time,” Cortex, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 619–620, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. A. Hobson, “REM sleep and dreaming: towards a theory of protoconsciousness,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 803–814, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Kahn and T. Gover, “Consciousness in dreams,” International Review of Neurobiology, vol. 92, pp. 181–195, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. E. Brown, R. Basheer, J. T. McKenna, R. E. Strecker, and R. W. McCarley, “Control of sleep and wakefulness,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 1087–1187, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. V. Samsonovich and G. A. Ascoli, “The conscious self: ontology, epistemology and the mirror quest,” Cortex, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 621–636, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. G. Taylor, “Mind and consciousness: towards a final answer?” Physics of Life Reviews, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–45, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. H. Reynolds and R. Desimone, “The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem,” Neuron, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. J. Van Boxtel, N. Tsuchiya, and C. Koch, “Consciousness and attention: on sufficiency and necessity,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 1, article 217, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  20. T. Nagel, “What is it like to be a bat?” The Philosophical Review, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 435–450, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Gierer, “Brain, mind and limitations of a scientific theory of human consciousness,” BioEssays, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 499–505, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. Block, “Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 30, no. 5-6, pp. 481–548, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. O. J. Hulme, K. F. Friston, and S. Zeki, “Neural correlates of stimulus reportability,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1602–1610, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Peeters, “Language and the mind. On concepts and values,” Pragmatics and Cognition, vol. 4, pp. 139–152, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  25. A. B. Butler, “Hallmarks of consciousness,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 739, pp. 291–309, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  26. R. P. Behrendt, “Contribution of hippocampal region CA3 to consciousness and schizophrenic hallucinations,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1121–1136, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. De Gennaro, C. Marzano, C. Cipolli, and M. Ferrara, “How we remember the stuff that dreams are made of: neurobiological approaches to the brain mechanisms of dream recall,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 592–596, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  28. G. Tononi and G. M. Edelman, “Consciousness and complexity,” Science, vol. 282, no. 5395, pp. 1846–1851, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Cleeremans, “Computational correlates of consciousness,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 150, pp. 81–98, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. V. G. Hardcastle, “Consciousness and the neurobiology of perceptual binding,” Seminars in Neurology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 163–170, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Aru, N. Axmacher, A. T. Do Lam et al., “Local category-specific gamma band responses in the visual cortex do not reflect conscious perception,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, pp. 14909–14914, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  32. R. Q. Quiroga, “Concept cells: the building blocks of declarative memory functions,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 587–597, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  33. V. A. F. Lamme, “Towards a true neural stance on consciousness,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 494–501, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. B. Libet, “Reflections on the interaction of the mind and brain,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 78, no. 3–5, pp. 322–326, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. Hesslow, “Will neuroscience explain consciousness?” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. Mcginn, “Can we solve the mind-body problem?” Mind, vol. 98, no. 391, pp. 349–366, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. R. Searle, “How to study consciousness scientifically,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 353, no. 1377, pp. 1935–1942, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  38. G. A. Ascoli, “Is it already time to give up on a science of consciousness? A commentary on mysterianism,” Complexity, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  39. I. Newton, “Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica,” 1687, English translation by A. Motte 1729, http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Mathematical_Principles_of_Natural_Philosophy.
  40. M. Clavelin, The Natural Philosophy of Galileo, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1974.
  41. S. Carnot, Réflexions Sur la Puissance Motrice du Feu et Sur les Machines Propres À Développer cette Puissance, Bachelier, Paris, France, 1824, English translation of R. Thurston, 1890, http://books.google.com/books?id=tgdJAAAAIAAJ.
  42. D. Cardwell, From Watt to Clausius: The Rise of Thermodynamics in the Early Industrial Age, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA, 1971.
  43. R. Brown, “A brief account of microscopical observations made in the months of June, July and August, 1827, on the particles contained in the pollen of plants; and on the general existence of active molecules in organic and inorganic bodies,” Philosophical Magazine, vol. 4, pp. 161–173, 1828. View at Google Scholar
  44. D. Bernoulli, “Hydrodynamica, sive De viribus et motibus fluidorum commentarii,” 1738, http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuViewfull?mode=imagepath&url=/mpiwg/online/permanent/library/AZ870BWE/pageimg&viewMode=images.
  45. A. Einstein, Investigations on the Theory of Brownian Movement, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 1956.
  46. G. A. Ascoli, “From data to knowledge,” Neuroinformatics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 145–147, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. T. Vogelstein, R. J. Vogelstein, and C. E. Priebe, “Are mental properties supervenient on brain properties?” Scientific Reports, vol. 1, article 100, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  48. M. Allen and G. Williams, “Consciousness, plasticity, and connectomics: the role of intersubjectivity in human cognition,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 2, article 20, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  49. G. A. Silva, “The need for the emergence of mathematical neuroscience: beyond computation and simulation,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 5, article 51, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  50. W. Gerstner, H. Sprekeler, and G. Deco, “Theory and simulation in neuroscience,” Science, vol. 338, no. 6103, pp. 60–65, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  51. G. O’Brien and J. Opie, “A connectionist theory of phenomenal experience,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 127–148, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  52. G. Leisman and P. Koch, “Networks of conscious experience: computational neuroscience in understanding life, death, and consciousness,” Reviews in the Neurosciences, vol. 20, no. 3-4, pp. 151–176, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. G. Buzsáki, “The structure of consciousness,” Nature, vol. 446, no. 7133, article 267, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. O. Sporns, G. Tononi, and G. M. Edelman, “Connectivity and complexity: the relationship between neuroanatomy and brain dynamics,” Neural Networks, vol. 13, no. 8-9, pp. 909–922, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. G. A. Ascoli, “The complex link between neuroanatomy and consciousness,” Complexity, vol. 6, pp. 20–26, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  56. S. Herculano-Houzel, “The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 3, article 31, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. R. J. Douglas and K. A. Martin, “Mapping the matrix: the ways of neocortex,” Neuron, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 226–238, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. C. C. King, “Fractal and chaotic dynamics in nervous systems,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 279–308, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. P. So, J. T. Francis, T. I. Netoff, B. J. Gluckman, and S. J. Schiff, “Periodic orbits: a new language for neuronal dynamics,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 2776–2785, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. A. Fingelkurts and A. A. Fingelkurts, “Making complexity simpler: multivariability and metastability in the brain,” International Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 114, no. 7, pp. 843–862, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. Roy and R. Llinás, “Dynamic geometry, brain function modeling, and consciousness,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 168, pp. 133–144, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  62. G. Buzsáki, Rhythms of the Brain, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2006.
  63. T. Klausberger and P. Somogyi, “Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations,” Science, vol. 321, no. 5885, pp. 53–57, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. O. Sporns, Networks of the Brain, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2011.
  65. O. Sporns, G. Tononi, and R. Kötter, “The human connectome: a structural description of the human brain,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 1, no. 4, article e42, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. J. W. Lichtman, J. Livet, and J. R. Sanes, “A technicolour approach to the connectome,” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 417–422, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. J. Kim, T. Zhao, R. S. Petralia et al., “mGRASP enables mapping mammalian synaptic connectivity with light microscopy,” Nature Methods, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 96–102, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. J. DeFelipe, “From the connectome to the synaptome: an epic love story,” Science, vol. 330, no. 6008, pp. 1198–1201, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. Lu, “Neuronal tracing for connectomic studies,” Neuroinformatics, vol. 9, no. 2-3, pp. 159–166, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. N. Kasthuri and J. W. Lichtman, “The rise of the “projectome”,” Nature Methods, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 307–308, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. G. A. Ascoli, “Potential connectomics complements the endeavour of “no synapse left behind” in the cortex,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 590, no. 4, pp. 651–652, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  72. S. L. Hill, Y. Wang, I. Riachi, F. Schürmann, and H. Markram, “Statistical connectivity provides a sufficient foundation for specific functional connectivity in neocortical neural microcircuits,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 42, pp. E2885–E2894, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. A. M. Packer, D. J. McConnell, E. Fino, and R. Yuste, “Axo-dendritic overlap and laminar projection can explain interneuron connectivity to pyramidal cells,” Cereb Cortex, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  74. D. Kleinfeld, A. Bharioke, P. Blinder et al., “Large-scale automated histology in the pursuit of connectomes,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 45, pp. 16125–16138, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  75. M. Helmstaedter and P. P. Mitra, “Computational methods and challenges for large-scale circuit mapping,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 162–169, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  76. O. Sporns, “The human connectome: a complex network,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1224, pp. 109–125, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. J. Sepulcre, M. R. Sabuncu, and K. A. Johnson, “Network assemblies in the functional brain,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 384–391, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  78. A. W. Toga, K. A. Clark, P. M. Thompson, D. W. Shattuck, and J. D. Van Horn, “Mapping the human connectome,” Neurosurgery, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  79. D. C. Van Essen, K. Ugurbil, E. Auerbach et al., “The human connectome project: a data acquisition perspective,” Neuroimage, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 2222–2231, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  80. B. B. Biswal, M. Mennes, X. N. Zuo et al., “Toward discovery science of human brain function,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 10, pp. 4734–4739, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. D. N. Kennedy, “Making connections in the connectome era,” Neuroinformatics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 61–62, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J. W. Bohland, C. Wu, H. Barbas et al., “A proposal for a coordinated effort for the determination of brainwide neuroanatomical connectivity in model organisms at a mesoscopic scale,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 5, no. 3, Article ID e1000334, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. A. S. Chiang, C. Y. Lin, C. C. Chuang et al., “Three-dimensional reconstruction of brain-wide wiring networks in Drosophila at single-cell resolution,” Current Biology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. A. M. Zador, J. Dubnau, H. K. Oyibo, H. Zhan, G. Cao, and I. D. Peikon, “Sequencing the connectome,” PLoS Biology, vol. 10, no. 10, Article ID e1001411, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. E. T. Bullmore and D. S. Bassett, “Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome,” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, vol. 7, pp. 113–140, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. M. Kaiser, “A tutorial in connectome analysis: topological and spatial features of brain networks,” NeuroImage, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 892–907, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. P. Erdös and A. Rényi, “On random graphs,” Publicationes Mathematica, vol. 6, pp. 290–297, 1959. View at Google Scholar
  88. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, “Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks,” Nature, vol. 393, pp. 440–442, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. A. L. Barabási and R. Albert, “Emergence of scaling in random networks,” Science, vol. 286, pp. 509–512, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  90. R. Milo, S. Shen-Orr, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, D. Chklovskii, and U. Alon, “Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5594, pp. 824–827, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. O. Sporns and J. D. Zwi, “The small world of the cerebral cortex,” Neuroinformatics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 145–162, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. S. Song, P. J. Sjöström, M. Reigl, S. Nelson, and D. B. Chklovskii, “Highly nonrandom features of synaptic connectivity in local cortical circuits,” PLoS Biology, vol. 3, no. 10, article e350, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. W. J. Freeman and M. Breakspear, “Scale-free neocortical dynamics,” Scholarpedia, vol. 2, article 1357, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  94. B. J. Prettejohn, M. J. Berryman, and M. D. McDonnell, “Methods for generating complex networks with selected structural properties for simulations: a review and tutorial for neuroscientists,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 5, article 11, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. M. A. Porter, J. P. Onnela, and P. J. Mucha, “Communities in networks,” Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1082–1097, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. M. P. van den Heuvel and O. Sporns, “Rich-club organization of the human connectome,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 44, pp. 15775–15786, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  97. M. Rivera-Alba, S. N. Vitaladevuni, Y. Mishchenko et al., “Wiring economy and volume exclusion determine neuronal placement in the Drosophila brain,” Current Biology, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 2000–2005, 2011, Erratum in: Current Biology, vol. 22, no. 2, article 172, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  98. E. Bullmore and O. Sporns, “The economy of brain network organization,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 336–349, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  99. C. Assisi, M. Stopfer, and M. Bazhenov, “Using the structure of inhibitory networks to unravel mechanisms of spatiotemporal patterning,” Neuron, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 373–386, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. L. da Fontoura Costa, J. L. Batista, and G. A. Ascoli, “Communication structure of cortical networks,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 5, article 6, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  101. G. A. Ascoli, L. Alonso-Nanclares, S. A. Anderson et al., “Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 557–568, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. D. E. Fishkind, D. L. Sussman, M. Tang, J. T. Vogelstein, and C. E. Priebe, “Consistent adjacency-spectral partitioning for the stochastic block model when the model parameters are unknown,” SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  103. C. E. Priebe, J. T. Vogelstein, and D. Bock, “Optimizing the quantity/quality trade-off in connectome inference,” Communications in Statistics, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  104. J. Lu, J. C. Tapia, O. L. White, and J. W. Lichtman, “The interscutularis muscle connectome,” PLoS Biology, vol. 7, no. 2, article e32, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. C. Kelly, B. B. Biswal, R. C. Craddock, F. X. Castellanos, and M. P. Milham, “Characterizing variation in the functional connectome: promise and pitfalls,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 181–188, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  106. V. De Paola, A. Holtmaat, G. Knott et al., “Cell type-specific structural plasticity of axonal branches and boutons in the adult neocortex,” Neuron, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 861–875, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. M. Park, J. M. Salgado, L. Ostroff et al., “Plasticity-induced growth of dendritic spines by exocytic trafficking from recycling endosomes,” Neuron, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 817–830, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. K. M. Harris, “Structure, development, and plasticity of dendritic spines,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 343–348, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  109. N. Gogolla, I. Galimberti, and P. Caroni, “Structural plasticity of axon terminals in the adult,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 516–524, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. A. Holtmaat and K. Svoboda, “Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 647–658, 2009, Erratum in: Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vo. 10, no. 10, article 759, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  111. M. Fu and Y. Zuo, “Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the cortex,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 177–187, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. E. Bruel-Jungerman, S. Davis, and S. Laroche, “Brain plasticity mechanisms and memory: a party of four,” Neuroscientist, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 492–505, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. D. B. Chklovskii, B. W. Mel, and K. Svoboda, “Cortical rewiring and information storage,” Nature, vol. 431, no. 7010, pp. 782–788, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. S. Fusi, P. J. Drew, and L. F. Abbott, “Cascade models of synaptically stored memories,” Neuron, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 599–611, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. C. Kahn, The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: Fragments with Translation and Commentary, Cambridge University Press, London, UK, 1979.
  116. G. A. Ascoli and A. V. Samsonovich, “Science of the conscious mind,” Biological Bulletin, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 204–215, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. T. K. Landauer and S. T. Dumais, “A solution to Plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge,” Psychological Review, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 211–240, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. C. H. Papadimitriou, P. Raghavan, H. Tamaki, and S. Vempala, “Latent semantic indexing: a probabilistic analysis,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 217–235, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, “Latent Dirichlet allocation,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 3, no. 4-5, pp. 993–1022, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. C. Burgess and K. Lund, “Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space,” Language and Cognitive Processes, vol. 12, no. 2-3, pp. 177–210, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, and W. Kintsch, Eds., Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2007.
  122. C. E. Osgood, G. Suci, and P. Tannenbaum, The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill, USA, 1957.
  123. D. C. Rubin, “51 properties of 125 words: a unit analysis of verbal behavior,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 736–755, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. P. Roget, “Roget’s Thesaurus of English words and phrases,” 1852, http://www.roget.org.
  125. C. Fellbaum, WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1998.
  126. T. Gruber, “Ontology,” in Encyclopedia of Database Systems, L. Liu and M. Tamer Özsu, Eds., Springer, 2009, http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-definition-2007.htm. View at Google Scholar
  127. A. V. Samsonovic and G. A. Ascoli, “Principal semantic components of language and the measurement of meaning,” PloS ONE, vol. 5, no. 6, Article ID e10921, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. A. V. Samsonovich, R. F. Goldin, and G. A. Ascoli, “Toward a semantic general theory of everything,” Complexity, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 12–18, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. H. Lövheim, “A new three-dimensional model for emotions and monoamine neurotransmitters,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 341–348, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  130. G. Kemerling, “Aristotle: logical methods,” in The Philosophy Pages, 2011, http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/2n.htm. View at Google Scholar
  131. A. V. Samsonovich and G. A. Ascoli, “Augmenting weak semantic cognitive maps with an “abstractness” dimension,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  132. G. Recchia and M. N. Jones, “The semantic richness of abstract concepts,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 6, article 315, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  133. J. A. Wheeler, “Information, physics, quantum: the search for links. Ch. 19,” in Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, W. Zurek, Ed., Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, Calif, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  134. G. A. Ascoli, “Association, abstraction, and the emergence of the self,” Noetic Journal, vol. 2, pp. 9–20, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  135. G. A. Ascoli and M. Mainetti, Gated Learning: Much ADO About Background Information. Towards A Science of Consciousness, Stockholm, Sweden, 2011.
  136. M. Mainetti and G. A. Ascoli, Much ADO about BIG Learning, APS Mtg, Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  137. G. Tononi, “Consciousness as integrated information: a provisional manifesto,” Biological Bulletin, vol. 215, no. 3, pp. 216–242, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. G. Tononi and O. Sporns, “Measuring information integration,” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 4, article 31, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. D. Balduzzi and G. Tononi, “Integrated information in discrete dynamical systems: motivation and theoretical framework,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 4, no. 6, Article ID e1000091, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. B. J. Baars, “Global workspace theory of consciousness: toward a cognitive neuroscience of human experience,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 150, pp. 45–53, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. S. Dehaene and J. P. Changeux, “Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing,” Neuron, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 200–227, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. D. Balduzzi and G. Tononi, “Qualia: the geometry of integrated information,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 5, no. 8, Article ID e1000462, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, pp. 623–656, 1948. View at Google Scholar
  144. D. B. Chklovskii, S. Vitaladevuni, and L. K. Scheffer, “Semi-automated reconstruction of neural circuits using electron microscopy,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 667–675, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. E. G. Jones, J. M. Stone, and H. J. Karten, “High-resolution digital brain atlases: a Hubble telescope for the brain,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1225, no. 1, pp. E147–E159, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. H. Hama, H. Kurokawa, H. Kawano et al., “Scale: a chemical approach for fluorescence imaging and reconstruction of transparent mouse brain,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1481–1488, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  147. Y. Mishchenko and L. Paninski, “A Bayesian compressed-sensing approach for reconstructing neural connectivity from subsampled anatomical data,” Journal of Computational Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 371–388, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  148. A. Irimia, M. C. Chambers, C. M. Torgerson, and J. D. Horn, “Circular representation of human cortical networks for subject and population-level connectomic visualization,” Neuroimage, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 1340–1351, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  149. R. A. Koene, “Experimental research in whole brain emulation: the need for innovative in vivo measurement techniques,” International Journal of Machine Consciousness, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 35–65, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  150. R. Kurzweil and T. Grossman, “Fantastic voyage: live long enough to live forever. The science behind radical life extension questions and answers,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 149, pp. 187–194, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  151. M. J. Hawrylycz, E. S. Lein, A. L. Guillozet-Bongaarts et al., “An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome,” Nature, vol. 489, no. 7416, pp. 391–399, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  152. G. D. Evrony, X. Cai, E. Lee et al., “Single-neuron sequencing analysis of l1 retrotransposition and somatic mutation in the human brain,” Cell, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 483–496, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  153. O. Schmitt and P. Eipert, “neuroVIISAS: approaching multiscale simulation of the rat connectome,” Neuroinformatics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 243–267, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  154. G. A. Ascoli, “The coming of age of the hippocampome,” Neuroinformatics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. K. H. Ambert and A. M. Cohen, “Text-mining and neuroscience,” International Review of Neurobiologys, vol. 103, pp. 109–132, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  156. L. French, S. Lane, L. Xu et al., “Application and evaluation of automated methods to extract neuroanatomical connectivity statements from free text,” Bioinformatics, vol. 28, no. 22, pp. 2963–2970, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  157. G. A. Ascoli, “Global neuroscience: distributing the management of brain knowledge worldwide,” Neuroinformatics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  158. H. Akil, M. E. Martone, and D. C. Van Essen, “Challenges and opportunities in mining neuroscience data,” Science, vol. 331, no. 6018, pp. 708–712, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. G. A. Ascoli, Ed., Computational Neuroanatomy: Principles and Methods, Springer, Totowa, NJ, USA, 2002.
  160. M. Djurfeldt, “The connection-set algebra—a novel formalism for the representation of connectivity structure in neuronal network models,” Neuroinformatics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 287–304, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  161. J. A. Brown, J. D. Rudie, A. Bandrowski, J. D. Van Horn, and S. Y. Bookheimer, “The UCLA multimodal connectivity database: a web-based platform for brain connectivity matrix sharing and analysis,” Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, vol. 6, article 28, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  162. G. V. Gkoutos, P. N. Schofield, and R. Hoehndorf, “The neurobehavior ontology: an ontology for annotation and integration of behavior and behavioral phenotypes,” International Review of Neurobiology, vol. 3, pp. 69–87, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  163. J. A. Turner and A. R. Laird, “The cognitive paradigm ontology: design and application,” Neuroinformatics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  164. M. A. Arbib, J. J. Bonaiuto, I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky et al., “Action and language mechanisms in the brain: data, models and neuroinformatics,” Neuroinformatics, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  165. T. E. Feinberg, “Neuroontology, neurobiological naturalism, and consciousness: a challenge to scientific reduction and a solution,” Physics of Life Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 13–34, 2012. View at Google Scholar