Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
ISRN Soil Science
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 308159, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/308159
Research Article

Predicting Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity by Artificial Intelligence and Regression Models

1Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agrriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
3School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada

Received 7 April 2013; Accepted 12 May 2013

Academic Editors: G. Benckiser, D. Hui, H. K. Pant, and D. Zhou

Copyright © 2013 R. Rezaei Arshad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Bagarello, S. Sferlazza, and A. Sgroi, “Comparing two methods of analysis of single-ring infiltrometer data for a sandy-loam soil,” Geoderma, vol. 149, no. 3-4, pp. 415–420, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. Islam, W. W. Wallender, J. P. Mitchell, S. Wicks, and R. E. Howitt, “Performance evaluation of methods for the estimation of soil hydraulic parameters and their suitability in a hydrologic model,” Geoderma, vol. 134, no. 1-2, pp. 135–151, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Merdun, Ö. Çinar, R. Meral, and M. Apan, “Comparison of artificial neural network and regression pedotransfer functions for prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 90, no. 1-2, pp. 108–116, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Tomasella, Y. Pachepsky, S. Crestana, and W. J. Rawls, “Comparison of two techniques to develop pedotransfer functions for water retention,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1085–1092, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. Minasny, J. W. Hopmans, T. Harter, S. O. Eching, A. Tuli, and M. A. Denton, “Neural networks prediction of soil hydraulic functions for alluvial soils using multistep outflow data,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 417–429, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. A. Pachepsky, W. J. Rawls, and H. S. Lin, “Hydropedology and pedotransfer functions,” Geoderma, vol. 131, no. 3-4, pp. 308–316, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. H. M. Wösten, P. A. Finke, and M. J. W. Jansen, “Comparison of class and continuous pedotransfer functions to generate soil hydraulic characteristics,” Geoderma, vol. 66, no. 3-4, pp. 227–237, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Bouma and J. A. van Lanen, “Transfer functions and threshold values: from soil characteristics to land qualities,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Quantifi ed Land Evaluation Procedures, K. J. Beek, P. A. Burrough, and D. E. McCormack, Eds., pp. 106–111, International Inst. For Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences, Washington, DC, USA, May 1987.
  9. H. S. Lin, K. J. McInnes, L. P. Wilding, and C. T. Hallmark, “Effects of soil morphology on hydraulic properties. II. Hydraulic pedotransfer functions,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 955–961, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Mayr and N. J. Jarvis, “Pedotransfer functions to estimate soil water retention parameters for a modified Brooks-Corey type model,” Geoderma, vol. 91, no. 1-2, pp. 1–9, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. Minasny and A. B. McBratney, “The neuro-m method for fitting neural network parametric pedotransfer functions,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 352–361, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Baker and D. Ellison, “Optimisation of pedotransfer functions using an artificial neural network ensemble method,” Geoderma, vol. 144, no. 1-2, pp. 212–224, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. Z. Panagou, V. Kodogiannis, and G. J.-E. Nychas, “Modelling fungal growth using radial basis function neural networks: the case of the ascomycetous fungus Monascus ruber van Tieghem,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 276–286, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. S. R. Jang, “ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 665–685, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. R. Motaghian and J. Mohammadi, “Predictive infiltration rate mapping with improved soil and terrain predictors,” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1562–1567, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Tomasella, M. G. Hodnett, and L. Rossato, “Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of soil water retention in Brazilian soils,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 327–338, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. H. M. Wösten, Y. A. Pachepsky, and W. J. Rawls, “Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 251, no. 3-4, pp. 123–150, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. Wieland and W. Mirschel, “Adaptive fuzzy modeling versus artificial neural networks,” Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 215–224, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Parasuraman, A. Elshorbagy, and B. C. Si, “Estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity in spatially variable fields using neural network ensembles,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1851–1859, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. Avci and Z. H. Akpolat, “Speech recognition using a wavelet packet adaptive network based fuzzy inference system,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 495–503, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Ryoo, Z. Dragojlovic, and D. A. Kaminski, “Control of convergence in a computational fluid dynamics simulation using ANFIS,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Baylar, D. Hanbay, and E. Ozpolat, “Modeling aeration efficiency of stepped cascades by using ANFIS,” Clean—Soil, Air, Water, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 186–192, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. S. Jang and N. Gulley, Fuzzy Logic Toolbox: Reference Manual, The Mathworks, Natick, Mass, USA, 1996.
  24. M. H. Mahdian and R. S. Oskoee, “Developing pedotransfer functions to predict infiltration rate in flood spreading stations of Iran,” Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 697–704, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. H. P. Ritzema, Drainage Principles and Applications, ILRI, The Netherlands, 1994.
  26. W. A. Agyare, S. J. Park, and P. L. G. Vlek, “Artificial neural network estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity,” Vadose Zone Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 423–431, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. C. Luk, J. E. Ball, and A. Sharma, “A study of optimal model lag and spatial inputs to artificial neural network for rainfall forecasting,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 227, no. 1-4, pp. 56–65, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Tamari, J. H. M. Wösten, and J. C. Ruiz-Suárez, “Testing an artificial neural network for predicting soil hydraulic conductivity,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1732–1741, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. I. Yilmaz, M. Marschalko, M. Bednarik, O. Kaynar, and L. Fojtova, “Neural computing models for prediction of permeability coefficient of coarse-grained soils,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 957–968, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. G. Schaap and F. J. Leij, “Using neural networks to predict soil water retention and soil hydraulic conductivity,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 47, no. 1-2, pp. 37–42, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. A. Pachepsky, D. Timlin, and G. Varallyay, “Artificial neural networks to estimate soil water retention from easily measurable data,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 727–733, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Kim and J. E. Gilley, “Artificial Neural Network estimation of soil erosion and nutrient concentrations in runoff from land application areas,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 268–275, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. I. Yilmaz, M. Marschalko, M. Bednarik, O. Kaynar, and L. Fojtova, “Neural computing models for prediction of permeability coefficient of coarse-grained soils,” Neural Computing and Applications, pp. 1–12, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Aqil, I. Kita, A. Yano, and S. Nishiyama, “A comparative study of artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy in continuous modeling of the daily and hourly behaviour of runoff,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 337, no. 1-2, pp. 22–34, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. H. M. Ertunc and M. Hosoz, “Comparative analysis of an evaporative condenser using artificial neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1426–1436, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. I. Yilmaz and O. Kaynar, “Multiple regression, ANN (RBF, MLP) and ANFIS models for prediction of swell potential of clayey soils,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5958–5966, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. T. Takagi and M. Sugeno, “Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 116–132, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus