Review Article

Nutrition, Inflammation, and Acute Pancreatitis

Table 4

Safety and tolerance of nasogastric tube feeding.

ReferenceTotal patientsTroublesome diarrhoea
, (%)
Tube removal
, (%)
Gastric retention , (%)Exacerbation of pain following feeding, , (%)Achievement of nutritional goalFull tolerance of feeding
, (%)

Eatock et al. 2000 [76]263 (11.5)1 (3.8)3 (11.5)0 (0)Not stated19 (73.1)
Eatock et al. 2005 [58]273 (11.1)1 (3.7)0 (0)2 (7.4)21 patients (78%)
after 60 hours
23 (85.1)
Kumar et al. 2006 [59]164 (25)1 (6.3)0 (0)1 (6.3)16 patients (100%)
by day 7*
11 (68.8)
Eckerwall et al. 2006 [41]230 (0)0 (0)3 (13)Not stated15 patients (66%)
by day 7
20 (86.9)
Singh et al. 2012 [64]394 (10.4)0 (0)1 (2.5) 3 (7.7) Not stated34 (85.6)

Total13114 (10.7)3 (2.3)7 (5.3)6 (4.5)N/A107 (82.0)

Did not require temporary reduction, stoppage, or withdrawal of feeding; *six patients were supplemented by parenteral nutrition during the commencement of feeding. N/A: not available.