Research Article
Using the Contingent Grouping Method to Value Forest Attributes
Table 1
Grouping and information about the individual’s preferences.
| | Groupings* | Information about the individual’s preferences** |
| | (i) | (i′) | | (ii) | (ii′) | | (iii) | (iii′) | | (iv) | (iv′) | | (v) | (v′) | | (vi) | (vi′) | | (vii) | (vii′) | | (viii) | (viii′) | | (ix) | (ix′) | | (x) | (x′) | | (xi) | (xi′) | | (xii) | (xii′) | | (xiii) | (xiii′) | | (xiv) | (xiv′) | | (xv) | (xv′) | | (xvi) | (xvi′) |
|
|
“>” reads “preferred to.”
**For example, denotes the probability of selecting the alternative from the choice set composed by the alternatives , and .
|
