- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 501813, 3 pages
Posterior Cord of Brachial Plexus and Its Branches: Anatomical Variations and Clinical Implication
1Department of Anatomy, L.N. Medical College and J.K. Hospital, Sector-C Sarvdharm, Kolar Road, Bhopal, India
2Department of Pediatrics, Subharti Medical College, Meerut, India
Received 14 August 2012; Accepted 11 September 2012
Academic Editors: A. Hiura, G. S. Kayalioglu, and G. Tender
Copyright © 2013 Rakhi Rastogi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background. Knowledge of anatomical variations of posterior cord and its branches is important not only for the administration of anaesthetic blocks but also for surgical approaches to the neck, axilla, and upper arm. The present study aimed to record the prevalence of such variations with embryological explanation and clinical implication. Material and Method. 37 formalin-preserved cadavers, that is, 74 upper extremities from the Indian population, constituted the material for the study. Cadavers were dissected during routine anatomy classes for medical undergraduate. Dissection includes surgical incision in the axilla, followed by retraction of various muscles, to observe and record the formation and branching pattern of posterior cord of brachial plexus. Results. Posterior cord was formed by union of posterior division of C5 and C6 roots with posterior division of middle and lower trunk (there was no upper trunk) in 16.2% of upper extremities. Posterior cord of brachial plexus was present lateral to the second part of axillary artery in 18.9% of upper extremities. Axillary nerve was taking origin from posterior division of upper trunk in 10.8% upper extremities and thoracodorsal nerve arising from axillary nerve in 22.9% upper extremities. Conclusion. It is important to be aware of such variations while planning a surgery in the region of axilla as these nerves are more liable to be injured during surgical procedures.
Posterior cord of brachial plexus is formed by union of posterior division of upper, middle, and lower trunk of brachial plexus. It lies posterior to, second part of axillary artery. The posterior cord of brachial plexus after giving upper subscapular, thoracodorsal, lower subscapular, and axillary nerve in the axilla continues distally as the radial nerve . Knowledge of the variations of posterior cord and its branches is important for the administration of anaesthetic blocks, surgical approaches to the neck, axilla, and upper arm [2, 3]. The present study describes the variations of posterior cord observed in population from central India.
2. Material and Method
The formalin-fixed 37 cadavers, that is, 74 upper extremities constitute the material for study. During routine dissection of axilla and supraclavicular region of medical undergraduates in L.N. Medical College Bhopal, the skin and various muscles were reflected and superficial fascia and deep fascia were separated to visualize the formation and branching pattern of posterior cord.
We recorded variations in the formation, location, and branching pattern of posterior cord. Posterior cord was formed by union of posterior division of C5 and C6 roots with posterior division of middle and lower trunk (there was no upper trunk) in 16.2% (12/74) of upper extremities (Figure 1). Posterior cord of brachial plexus was present lateral to the second part of axillary artery in 18.9% (14/74) of upper extremities (Figure 2). Axillary nerve was taking origin from posterior division of upper trunk in 10.8% (8/74) upper extremities (Figure 2) and thoracodorsal nerve arising from axillary nerve in 22.9% (17/74) upper extremities (Figure 3). Upper subscapular, lower subscapular, and radial nerve origin were normal in all 37 cadavers.
Posterior cord of brachial plexus, usually formed by union of posterior divisions of upper, middle, and lower trunk, respectively. In their study, Fazan et al.  observed that the posterior cord was formed by posterior division of upper and middle trunk (there was no lower trunk) in 9% of brachial plexus however Chaudhary et al.  reported the presence of four trunks in brachial plexus, namely, I, II, III, and IV in 3 cases of upper extremities and in all the three cases posterior cord was formed by union of posterior division of I, II, and III trunk having root value C5–C8.There were also reports of cases where ventral rami of C5 and C6 did not join to form upper trunk dividing independently into anterior and posterior divisions [6, 7]. In the present study we also observed C5 and C6 ventral rami dividing independently into anterior and posterior divisions (there was no upper trunk) the posterior divisions of C5 and C6 then united with the posterior divisions of middle and lower trunk to form posterior cord in 16.2% of upper extremities. Such variations in which there was no upper trunk may increase the chance of nerve root avulsion due to downward traction injury of brachial plexus .
These variations can be correlated embryologically. Position and width of a limb bud determine its innervations; limb bud is supplied by nerves of region where it is implanted. Segregation of the developing structure within the limb direct growing nerve fibers (axons) and determines their grouping into bundles leading to formation of roots and trunks . As the expression of chemoattractants and chemorepulsants regulates the growing nerve fibers (axons) in a highly coordinated site-specific fashion, any alterations in signaling between the mesenchymal cells and neuronal growth cones can lead to significant variations . In the present study, the nonformation of the upper trunk appears to be a result of overexpression of chemoattractants/repulsants, leading to separation of the C5 and the C6 roots. Miller in different vertebrates observed patterns of the roots, trunks, cords, and branches of brachial plexus and reported no trunk formation in amphibians, reptiles, and dogs  in our study also in 16.2% cases upper trunk was not formed, which partially fits into this category and indicates ontogeny repeats phylogeny.
According to standard text books of anatomy the posterior cord is related laterally to the second part of axillary artery . There were reports where posterior cord was present lateral to the second part of axillary artery [12, 13]. In our study we also observed it was lateral to the second part of axillary artery in 18.9% cases.
The branches of posterior cord of brachial plexus include upper subscapular, thoracodorsal, lower subscapular, axillary, and radial nerve. Bhat and Girijavallaban et al.  and Jamuna  described case where posterior cord split into anterior and posterior divisions. The axillary nerve in both cases took origin from posterior division of posterior cord. However Matejcik  and Chaudhary et al.  in their study on brachial plexus observed axillary nerve originating from posterior division of upper trunk in three cases and one case, respectively. Axillary nerve was taking origin from posterior division of upper trunk in 10.8% upper extremities in the present study which is much higher than Matejcik and Chaudhary et al. On the other hand we also observed thoracodorsal nerve originates from axillary nerve in 22.9% upper extremities which was much higher than previous studies of Fazan et al. (13%)  and Muthoka et al. (10.3%) .
We believe that prior knowledge of the previously mentioned variations of posterior cord of brachial plexus is useful to surgeons for surgical treatment of tumor of nerve sheath such as schwannomas and neurofibromas, anesthesiologists for administering local anesthetic blocks, and clinicians for interpreting effects of nerve injuries to the upper limb.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
- S. Standring, “Pectoral girdle and shoulder region,” in Gray’s Anatomy, the Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, pp. 780–781, Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY, USA, 40th edition, 2008.
- L. E. Ballesteros and L. M. Ramirez, “Variations of the origin of collateral branches emerging from the posterior aspect of the brachial plexus,” Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury, vol. 2, no. 1, article 14, 2007.
- K. M. R. Bhat and V. Girijavallabhan, “Variation in the branching pattern of posterior cord of brachial plexus,” Neuroanatomy, vol. 7, pp. 10–11, 2008.
- V. P. S. Fazan, A. D. S. Amadeu, A. L. Caleffi, and O. A. Rodrigues Filho, “Brachial plexus variations in its formation and main branches,” Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 14–18, 2003.
- P. Chaudhary, R. Singla, G. Kalsey, and K. Arora, “Branching pattern of the posterior cord of brachial plexus: a cadaveric study,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 787–790, 2011.
- R. K. Singla, R. Mahajan, R. Sharma, and T. Sharma, “Bilateral non-formation of upper trunk of the brachial plexus with a unilateral communication between the musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve: a case report,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1637–1640, 2011.
- J. Villamere, S. Goodwin, M. Hincke, and A. Jalali, “A brachial plexus variation characterized by the absence of the superior trunk,” Neuroanatomy, vol. 8, pp. 4–6, 2009.
- J. H. Stevens, “Brachial plexus paralysis. By J.H. Stevens, M.D., 1934,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 237, pp. 4–8, 1988.
- N. Z. Keibel and F. P. Mall, “Nerves of the arm and leg,” in Manual of Human Embryology, pp. 122–128, J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1st edition, 1912.
- H. D. Sannes, T. A. Reh, and W. A. Harris, “Axon growth and guidance,” in Development of Nervous System, pp. 189–197, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
- R. A. Miller, “Comprative studies upon the morphology and the distribution of the brachial plexus,” American Journal of Anatomy, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 143–175, 1932.
- M. Jamuna, “Clinically significant variations of the cords of the brachial plexus in relation to axillary artery,” International Journal of Anatomical Variations, vol. 4, pp. 9–11, 2011.
- N. Satyanarayana, N. Vishwakarma, G. P. Kumar, R. Guha, A. K. Datta, and P. Sunitha, “Variation in relation of cords of brachial plexus and their branches with axillary and brachial arteries—a case report,” Nepal Medical College Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 69–72, 2009.
- M. Jamuna, “A rare variation in the mode of termination of posterior cord of brachial plexus,” International Journal of Anatomical Variations, vol. 3, pp. 95–96, 2010.
- V. Matejcik, “Aberrant formation and clinical picture of brachial plexus from the point of view of a neurosurgeon,” Bratislavske Lekarske Listy, vol. 104, no. 10, pp. 291–299, 2003.
- J. M. Muthoka, S. R. Sinkeet, S. H. Shahbal, L. C. Matakwa, and J. A. Ogeng'o, “Variations in branching of the posterior cord of brachial plexus in a Kenyan population,” Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury, vol. 6, no. 1, article 1, 2011.