Table of Contents
ISRN Rehabilitation
Volume 2013, Article ID 608356, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/608356
Research Article

Psychometric Evaluation of the Perceived Stress Scale in Multiple Sclerosis

1Group Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, P.O. Box 354237, Seattle, WA 98195-4237, USA

Received 23 October 2013; Accepted 2 December 2013

Academic Editors: B. Murphy and C. Zwingmann

Copyright © 2013 Salene M. Wu and Dagmar Amtmann. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society, “MS Prevalence,” 2002, http://www.nationalmssociety.org/about-the-society/ms-prevalence/index.aspx.
  2. A. Feinstein, “Multiple sclerosis and depression,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1276–1281, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. M. Monroe, G. M. Slavich, L. D. Torres, and I. H. Gotlib, “Major life events and major chronic difficulties are differentially associated with history of major depressive episodes,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 116–124, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Cohen, T. Kamarck, and R. Mermelstein, “A global measure of perceived stress,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 385–396, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. van Kessel, R. Moss-Morris, E. Willoughby, T. Chalder, M. H. Johnson, and E. Robinson, “A randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavior therapy for multiple sclerosis fatigue,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 205–213, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. A. Trojan, D. Arnold, J.-P. Collet et al., “Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: association with disease-related, behavioural and psychosocial factors,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 985–995, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Cohen and G. Williamson, “Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States,” in The Social Psychology of Health, S. S. A. S. Oskamp, Ed., pp. 31–67, Sage, Newbury Park, Calif, USA, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  8. D. Y. P. Leung, T.-H. Lam, and S. S. C. Chan, “Three versions of perceived stress scale: validation in a sample of Chinese cardiac patients who smoke,” BMC Public Health, vol. 10, article 513, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Remor, “Psychometric properties of a European Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS),” Spanish Journal of Psychology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 86–93, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. Andreou, E. C. Alexopoulos, C. Lionis et al., “Perceived Stress Scale: reliability and validity study in Greece,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 3287–3298, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Siqueira Reis, A. A. Ferreira Hino, and C. RomÉlio Rodriguez Añez, “Perceived stress scale: reliability and validity study in Brazil,” Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. M. Golden-Kreutz, M. W. Browne, G. M. Frierson, and B. L. Andersen, “Assessing stress in cancer patients: a second-order factor analysis model for the perceived stress scale,” Assessment, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 216–223, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Ç. Örücü and A. Demir, “Psychometric evaluation of perceived stress scale for Turkish university students,” Stress and Health, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 103–109, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. J. Holzinger and F. Swineford, “The Bi-factor method,” Psychometrika, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–54, 1937. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. P. Reise, J. Morizot, and R. D. Hays, “The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 16, no. 1, supplement, pp. 19–31, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. L. Spitzer, K. Kroenke, and J. B. W. Williams, “Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ Primary Care Study,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 282, no. 18, pp. 1737–1744, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. Kroenke, R. L. Spitzer, and J. B. W. Williams, “The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 606–613, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. J. Ferrando, J. Samton, N. Mor et al., “Patient health questionnaire-9 to screen for depression in outpatients with multiple sclerosis,” International Journal of MS Care, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 99–103, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  19. J. Ware, M. Kosinski, J. E. Dewey, and B. Gandek, How to Score and Interpret Measures: A Manual for Users of the SF-8 Health Survey, QualyMetric, Boston, Mass, USA, 2001.
  20. C. B. Terwee, S. D. M. Bot, M. R. de Boer et al., “Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 34–42, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. S. Everitt, The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2002.
  22. S. P. Reise and M. G. Haviland, “Item response theory and the measurement of clinical change,” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 228–238, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. K. Ostwald, M. P. Bernal, S. G. Cron, and K. M. Godwin, “Stress experienced by stroke survivors and spousal caregivers during the first year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation,” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 93–104, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus