Table of Contents
ISRN Rehabilitation
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 610709, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/610709
Research Article

In Vivo Identification of Skeletal Muscle Dynamics with Nonlinear Kalman Filter: Comparison between EKF and SPKF

DEMAR Project, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis and LIRMM, CNRS, University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France

Received 24 March 2013; Accepted 20 April 2013

Academic Editors: A. Cappozzo and S. Park

Copyright © 2013 Mitsuhiro Hayashibe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Kralj and T. Bajd, Functional Electrical Stimulation: Standing and Walking After Spinal Cord Injury, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1989.
  2. R. Kobetic, R. J. Triolo, and E. B. Marsolais, “Muscle selection and walking performance of multichannel FES systems for ambulation in paraplegia,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. D. N. Donaldson, T. A. Perkins, and A. C. M. Worley, “Lumbar root stimulation for restoring leg function: stimulator and measurement of muscle actions,” Artificial Organs, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 247–249, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Kobetic, R. J. Triolo, J. P. Uhlir et al., “Implanted functional electrical stimulation system for mobility in paraplegia: a follow-up case report,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 390–398, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Guiraud, T. Stieglitz, K. P. Koch, J. Divoux, and P. Rabischong, “An implantable neuroprosthesis for standing and walking in paraplegia: 5-year patient follow-up,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 268–275, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. K. Durfee, “Control of standing and gait using electrical stimulation: influence of muscle model complexity on control strategy,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 97, pp. 369–381, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Riener, “Model-based development of neuroprostheses for paraplegic patients,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 354, no. 1385, pp. 877–894, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Popovic and T. Sinkjaer, Control of Movement for the Physically Disabled: Control for Rehabilitation Technology, Spinger, London, UK, 2000.
  9. A. F. Huxley, “Muscle structure and theories of contraction,” Progress in Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, vol. 7, pp. 255–318, 1957. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. V. Hill, “The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants in muscle,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, vol. 126, no. 843, pp. 136–195, 1938. View at Google Scholar
  11. G. I. Zahalak, “A distribution-moment approximation for kinetic theories of muscular contraction,” Mathematical Biosciences, vol. 55, no. 1-2, pp. 89–114, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. F. E. Zajac, “Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control,” Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 359–411, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Bestel and M. Sorine, “A differential model of muscle contraction and applications,” in Schloessmann Seminar on Mathematical Models in Biology, Chemistry and Physics, Max Plank Society, Bad Lausick, Germany, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  14. H. El Makssoud, D. Guiraud, P. Poignet et al., “Multiscale modeling of skeletal muscle properties and experimental validations in isometric conditions,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 121–138, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Riener, M. Ferrarin, E. E. Pavan, and C. A. Frigo, “Patient-driven control of FES-supported standing up and sitting down: experimental results,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 523–529, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Hayashibe, P. Poignet, D. Guiraud, and H. El Makssoud, “Nonlinear identification of skeletal muscle dynamics with sigma-point Kalman Filter for model-based FES,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '08), pp. 2049–2054, Pasadena, Calif, USA, May 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Schauer, N. Negård, F. Previdi et al., “Online identification and nonlinear control of the electrically stimulated quadriceps muscle,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1207–1219, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. O. Sayadi and M. B. Shamsollahi, “ECG denoising and compression using a modified extended Kalman filter structure,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2240–2248, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. E. J. Perreault, C. J. Heckman, and T. G. Sandercock, “Hill muscle model errors during movement are greatest within the physiologically relevant range of motor unit firing rates,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 211–218, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. Riener and J. Quintern, “A physiologically based model of muscle activation verified by electrical stimulation,” Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 257–264, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. K. Durfee and K. E. MacLean, “Methods for estimating isometric recruitment curves of electrically stimulated muscle,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 654–667, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Hatze, “A general mycocybernetic control model of skeletal muscle,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 143–157, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. El Makssoud, Modelisation et identification des muscles squelettiques sous stimulation electrique fonctionnelle [Ph.D. thesis], University of Montpellier II, 2005.
  24. S. J. Julier and J. K. Uhlmann, “A new extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Symposim on Aerospace, Defence Sensing, Simulation and Controls (AeroSence '97), 1997.
  25. R. Merwe and E. Wan, “Sigma-point Kalman filters for probabilistic inference in dynamic state-space models,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Advances in Machine Learning, Montreal, Canada, June 2003.
  26. S. J. Julier and J. K. Uhlmann, “Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 401–422, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E. Rabischong and D. Guiraud, “Determination of fatigue in the electrically stimulated quadriceps muscle and relative effect of ischaemia,” Journal of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 443–450, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Hayashibe, Q. Zhang, D. Guiraud, and C. Fattal, “Evoked EMG-based torque prediction under muscle fatigue in implanted neural stimulation,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID 064001, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Hayashibe, M. Benoussaad, D. Guiraud, P. Poignet, and C. Fattal, “Nonlinear identification method corresponding to muscle property variation in FES—experiments in paraplegic patients,” in Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob '10), pp. 401–406, Tokyo, Japan, September 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. Maybeck, Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control, vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1982.