Table of Contents
ISRN Optics
Volume 2013, Article ID 697176, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/697176
Research Article

Uncertainty Estimation due to Geometrical Imperfection and Wringing in Calibration of End Standards

Length and Precision Engineering Division, National Institute for Standards (NIS), Giza 12211-136, Egypt

Received 8 July 2013; Accepted 2 August 2013

Academic Editors: A. K. Dharmadhikari and S. R. Restaino

Copyright © 2013 Salah H. R. Ali and Ihab H. Naeim. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. ISO 3650, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)-Length Standards-Gauge Blocks, International Organization for Standardization, 2008.
  2. H. Castrup and S. Castrup, Uncertainty Analysis for Alternative Calibration Scenarios, NCSLI Workshop & Symposium, Orlando, Fla, USA, 2008.
  3. J. E. Decker and J. R. Pekelsky, “Uncertainty evaluation for the measurement of gauge blocks by optical interferometry,” Metrologia, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 479–493, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. Naeim and S. Khodier, “Nanometer positioning accuracy over a long term traveling stage based on heterodyne interferometry,” International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 97–100, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Wengierow, L. Sałbut, and Z. Ramotowski, “Interferometric multiwavelength system for long gauge blocks measurements,” in Optical Measurement Systems for Industrial Inspection VII, vol. 8082 of Proceeding of SPIE, Munich, Germany, May 2011.
  6. S. H. R. Ali, “Advanced nanomeasuring techniques for surface characterization,” International Scholarly Research Network, ISRN Optics Journal, vol. 2012, Article ID 859353, pp. 1–23, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. Thalmann and H. Baechler, “Issues and advantages of gauge block calibration by mechanical comparison,” in Recent Developments in Traceable Dimensional Measurements II, vol. 5190 of Proceeding of SPIE, pp. 62–69, August 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. BIPM, “Evaluation of measurement data-guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement,” JCGM 100, 2008, http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf.
  9. L.-C. Chen, S.-L. Yeh, A. M. Tapilouw, and J.-C. Chang, “3-D surface profilometry using simultaneous phase-shifting interferometry,” Optics Communications, vol. 283, no. 18, pp. 3376–3382, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Hidaka, A. Saito, and S. Koga, “Study of a micro-roughness probe with ultrasonic sensor,” CIRP Annals, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 489–492, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Steel gauge block surface, “Data is measured with AFM microscope,” height mode, http://www.sciencegl.com/3dsurf/shots/screenshots.htm.
  12. A. Godina, T. Vuherer, and B. Acko, “Possibilities for minimising uncertainty of dissimilar materials gauge blocks calibration by mechanical comparison,” Measurement, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 517–524, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. ZMI-1000A, Operating Manual, Zygo Corporation, Middlefield, Conn, USA, 1999.
  14. EAL-G21, Calibration of Gauge Block Ccomparators, 1996.
  15. T. Doiron and J. Beers, The Gauge Block Handbook, NIST monograph 180 with Corrections, 1995.