Table of Contents
ISRN Dentistry
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 704027, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/704027
Research Article

Effect of Patency File on Transportation and Curve Straightening in Canal Preparation with ProTaper System

1Torabinejad Dental Research Center and Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174755153, Iran
2Torabinejad Dental Research Center and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran

Received 11 July 2013; Accepted 13 August 2013

Academic Editors: A. Jäger and G. Kulkarni

Copyright © 2013 Seyed Mohsen Hasheminia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Schilder, “Cleaning and shaping the root canal,” Dental Clinics of North America, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 269–296, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. S. Buchanan, “Management of the curved root canal,” Journal of the California Dental Association, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 18–27, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. Bergmans, J. Van Cleynenbreugel, M. Wevers, and P. Lambrechts, “Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Status Report for the American Journal of Dentistry,” American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 324–333, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. C. R. Ferraz, N. V. Gomes, B. P. F. A. Gomes, A. A. Zaia, F. B. Teixeira, and F. J. Souza-Filho, “Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 354–358, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Park, “A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 715–718, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Schäfer and H. Florek, “Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 199–207, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Y. Özer, “Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 244–250, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Veltri, A. Mollo, P. P. Pini, L. F. Ghelli, and P. Balleri, “In vitro comparison of shaping abilities of protaper and gt rotary files,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 163–166, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. H. Javaheri and G. H. Javaheri, “A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 284–286, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Gergi, J. A. Rjeily, J. Sader, and A. Naaman, “Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 904–907, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. G. Cailleteau, “Prevalence of teaching apical patency and various instrumentation and obturation techniques in United States dental schools,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 394–396, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. F. Goldberg and E. J. Massone, “Patency file and apical transportation: an in vitro study,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 510–511, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. W. Schneider, “A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 271–275, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. M. Bramante, A. Berbert, and R. P. Borges, “A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 243–245, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. E. Del Rio, “Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 369–375, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Deplazes, O. Peters, and F. Barbakow, “Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickel-titanium hand instruments,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 196–202, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. Imura, A. S. Kato, N. F. Novo, G.-I. Hata, M. Uemura, and T. Toda, “A comparison of mesial molar root canal preparations using two engine-driven instruments and the balanced-force technique,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 627–631, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. A. Backman, R. J. Oswald, and D. L. Pitts, “A radiographic comparison of two root canal instrumentation techniques,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. B. Sydney, A. Batista, and L. L. de Melo, “The radiographic platform: a new method to evaluate root canal preparation in vitro,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 570–572, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Hülsmann and F. Stryga, “Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 141–145, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M.-K. Wu, “Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 210–216, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. O. A. Peters, C. I. Peters, K. Schönenberger, and F. Barbakow, “ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 86–92, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. Gao, O. A. Peters, H. Wu, and X. Zhou, “An application framework of three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement for endodontic research,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 269–274, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. A. Bernardes, E. A. Rocha, M. A. H. Duarte et al., “Root canal area increase promoted by the EndoSequence and ProTaper systems: comparison by computed tomography,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1179–1182, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. T. Sberna, G. Rizzo, E. Zacchi, P. Capparè, and A. Rubinacci, “A preliminary study of the use of peripheral quantitative computed tomography for investigating root canal anatomy,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 66–75, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Guelzow, O. Stamm, P. Martus, and A. M. Kielbassa, “Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 743–752, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Y. Yoshimine, M. Ono, and A. Akamine, “The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 373–375, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. H. Gutiérrez, C. Brizuela, and E. Villota, “Human teeth with periapical pathosis after overinstrumentation and overfilling of the root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. A. Gonzalez Sanchez, F. Duran-Sindreu, M. Albuquerque Matos et al., “Apical transportation created using three different patency instruments,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 560–564, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. M. Hasheminia and M. Shafiee Ardestani, “The effect of using patency file on apical transportation in canals prepared with passive step back technique,” Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 12–17, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  31. I. Tsesis, B. Amdor, A. Tamse, and A. Kfir, “The effect of maintaining apical patency on canal transportation,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 431–435, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. A. Thompson and P. M. H. Dummer, “Shaping ability of lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 698–702, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. A. Thompson, “Shaping ability of lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 742–747, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. A. Thompson and P. M. H. Dummer, “Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: part 2,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 255–261, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. A. Thompson and P. M. H. Dummer, “Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: part 1,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 248–254, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. T. Bryant, P. M. H. Dummer, C. Pitoni, M. Bourba, and M. Moghal, “Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 155–164, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. T. Bryant, S. A. Thompson, M. A. O. Al-Omari, and P. M. H. Dummer, “Shaping ability of ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments with ISO sized tips in simulated root canals: part 2,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 282–289, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. T. Bryant, S. A. Thompson, M. A. O. Al-Omari, and P. M. H. Dummer, “Shaping ability of Profile rotary nickel-titanium instruments with ISO sized tips in simulated root canals: part 1,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 275–281, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. I. T. Griffiths, S. T. Bryant, and P. M. H. Dummer, “Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec LX rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a study in simulated canals,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 346–354, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. I. T. Griffiths, A. L. Chassot, M. F. Nascimento, S. T. Bryant, and P. M. H. Dummer, “Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec SC rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a study in simulated canals,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 107–112, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. M. Campos and C. del Rio, “Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 230–234, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus