Clinical Study

Clinicopathological Features of Growth Hormone-Producing Pituitary Adenomas in 242 Acromegaly Patients: Classification according to Hormone Production and Cytokeratin Distribution

Table 2

Clinical, endocrinological, and histological summary of growth hormone producing adenomas.

Total cases ( )

Hormonal typeGH adenoma ( )GH-PRL adenoma ( )GH-TSH adenoma ( )GH-PRL-TSH adenoma ( )
Cytokeratin stainingPP ( )PP ( )PP ( )PP ( )
P-pre
( )
P-inter
( )
DP
( )
NP
( )
P-pre
( )
P-inter
( )
DP
( )
NP
( )
P-pre
( )
P-inter
( )
DP
( )
NP
( )
P-pre
( )
P-inter
( )
DP
( )
NP
( )

Age a b
Sex (M/F)42/38 7/19c 3/140/50 2/4 2/58/8 1/14/9
22/2418/1415/1125/395/23/63/21/7

Cases without preoperative medical therapy ( )

Hormonal typeGH adenoma ( )GH-PRL adenoma ( )GH-TSH adenoma ( )GH-PRL-TSH adenoma ( )
Cytokeratin stainingPP ( )PP ( )PP ( )PP ( )
P-pre
( )
P-inter
( )
DP
( )
NP
( )
P-pre
( )
P-inter
( )
DP
( )
NP ( )P-pre
( )
P-inter
( )
DP
( )
NP ( )P-pre
( )
P-inter ( ) DP
( )
NP
( )

Age
Sex (M/F)25/22 5/12 3/035/42 1/3 2/45/6 1/13/7
14/1011/1214/721/354/21/42/11/6
GH (basal) (ng/mL) d
IGF-1 (U/mL)
PRL (ng/mL) e f
TSH (μIU/mL)
Maximum tumor diameter (mm) g h i
Micro (−10 mm)/
Macro (>10 mm)
17/30 0/17 0/333/44 1/3 0/63/8 1/14/6
7/1710/138/1325/311/52/32/12/5
Tumor volume (cm3) j k l
Knosp (3,4)13% 71%m 0%17% 0% 33%27% 50%30%
17%9%19%16%50%0%33%29%
Sphenoid sinus invasion13% 12% 0%18% 0% 0%36% 50%10%
17%9%24%16%33%40%33%0%

GH: growth hormone; PRL: prolactin; TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone; PP: perinuclear pattern; DP: dot pattern; NP: negative pattern; P-pre: perinuclear predominant pattern; P-inter: perinuclear intermediate pattern; IGF-1: insulin-like growth factor-1; M: male; F: female.
aSignificantly younger compared with PP GH ( ), GH-PRL ( ), and GH-PRL-TSH ( ) adenomas. bSignificantly younger compared with PP GH ( ), GH-PRL ( ), and GH-PRL-TSH ( ) adenomas. cSignificant female predominance compared with PP GH ( ) adenomas. dSignificantly lower compared with PP GH ( ), GH-PRL ( ), and GH-PRL-TSH ( ) adenomas. eSignificantly higher compared with PP ( ), DP ( ), NP ( ) GH adenomas, and PP GH-TSH ( ) adenomas. fSignificantly higher compared with PP ( ), NP ( ) of GH adenomas, and PP GH-TSH ( ) adenomas. gSignificantly larger compared with PP GH ( ), GH-PRL ( ), GH-PRL-TSH ( ) adenomas, and DP GH-PRL ( ) adenomas. hSignificantly larger compared with PP ( ), DP ( ) GH-PRL adenomas. iSignificantly larger compared with PP of GH-PRL ( ) adenomas. jSignificantly larger compared with PP GH ( ), GH-PRL ( ), GH-PRL-TSH ( ) adenomas, and DP GH-PRL ( ) adenomas. kSignificantly larger compared with PP ( ) and DP ( ) of GH-PRL adenomas. lSignificantly larger compared with PP of GH-PRL ( ) adenomas. mSignificant cavernous sinus invasion compared with PP ( ), NP ( ) GH adenomas, PP ( ), DP ( ) GH-PRL adenomas, PP GH-TSH ( ) adenomas, and GH-PRL-TSH ( ) adenomas.