Table of Contents
ISRN Family Medicine
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 798347, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2013/798347
Research Article

Constructing Taxonomies to Identify Distinctive Forms of Primary Healthcare Organizations

1Direction de santé publique de l’agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal, 1301 Sherbrooke Est, Montréal, QC, Canada H2L 1M3
2Institut national de santé publique du Québec, QC, Canada
3Département d’administration de la santé et institut de recherche en santé publique de l’université de Montréal, QC, Canada
4Centre de recherche du centre hospitalier de l’université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
5Département de médecine familiale, université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
6Centre de recherche de l’hôpital Charles Lemoyne, Longueuil, QC, Canada
7Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

Received 10 January 2013; Accepted 7 February 2013

Academic Editors: M. Menchetti and U. Rothe

Copyright © 2013 Roxane Borgès Da Silva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. B. Saltman, A. Rico, and W. Boerma, Primary Care in the Driver's Seat? Organizational Reform in European Primary Care, European Observatory on Health Care Systems and Policies, Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
  2. M. Clair, Commission d'Étude sur les Services de Santé et les Services Sociaux (Commission Clair), Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux. Gouvernement du Québec, Québec, Canada, 2000.
  3. M. J. L. Kirby, “The health of Canadians: the federal role,” Final Report-Volume Six Recommendations for Reform, The Senate Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology, Ontario, Canada, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  4. R. J. Romanow, “Building on values: the future of health care in Canada,” Final Report, Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, Ontario, Canada, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. F. Levesque, M. Généreux, M. A. Fortin et al., Rapport d'Appréciation de la Performance du Système de Santé et de Services Sociaux 2009: État de Situation Portant Sur le Système de Santé et de Services Sociaux et Sur sa Première Ligne de Soins, Commissaire à la Santé et au Bien-être, Québec, Canada, 2009.
  6. F. Champagne, A. P. Contandriopoulos, A. Brousselle, Z. Hartz, and J. L. Denis, “L'évaluation dans le domaine de la santé: concepts et méthodes,” in L'Évaluation: Concepts et Méthodes, A. Brousselle, F. Champagne, A. P. Contandriopoulos, and Z. Hartz, Eds., pp. 35–56, Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. K. J. Dooley and A. H. van de Ven, “Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics,” Organization Science, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 358–372, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. W. Begun, B. Zimmerman, and K. J. Dooley, “Health care organizations as complex adaptive systems,” in Advances in Health Care Organization Theory, S. S. Mick and M. Wyttenbach, Eds., pp. 253–288, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, NC, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  9. B. Hutchison, “A long time coming: primary healthcare renewal in Canada,” Healthcare Papers, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 10–24, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. S. Kringos, W. G. Boerma, A. Hutchinson, J. Van Der Zee, and P. P. Groenewegen, “The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 10, p. 65, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. P. Williams, E. Vayda, H. M. Stevenson, M. Burke, and K. D. Pierre, “A typology of medical practice organization in Canada. Data from a national survey of physicians,” Medical Care, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 995–1004, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. G. A. Feachem, N. K. Sekhri, and K. L. White, “Getting more for their dollar: a comparison of the NHS with California's Kaiser Permanente,” British Medical Journal, vol. 324, no. 7330, pp. 135–141, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Armstrong, O. Levesque, J. B. Perlin, C. Rick, G. Schectman, and P. M. Zalucki, “Reinventing veterans health administration: focus on primary care,” Healthcare Quarterly, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 4–80, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Muldoon, S. Dahrouge, W. Hogg, R. Geneau, G. Russell, and M. Shortt, “Community orientation in primary care practices: results from the comparison of models of primary health care in Ontario study,” Canadian Family Physician, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 676–683, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Gouvernement du Québec, “Local services network and health and social services centres,” http://www.msss.gouv.qc.ca/en/reseau/lsn.php.
  16. M. D. Beaulieu, J. L. Denis, D. 'Amour et al., “Implementing family medicine groups: the challenge in the reorganization of practice and interprofessional collaboration-case study of five FMGs in the first wave of Québec FMGs,” Doctor Sadok Besrour Chair, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. D. Beaulieu, J. Barnsley, J. L. Denis et al., “What are the predictors of quality primary-care medical services? A comparative study of different organizational models in Quebec,” No De Projet NGG00684, Faculté de Médecine-Médecine Familiale, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Gauthier, J. Haggerty, P. Lamarche et al., “Entre adaptabilité et fragilité: les conditions d'accès aux services de santé pour les communautés rurales et éloignées,” Rapport de Recherche, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, Canada, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  19. B. Starfield, Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services and Technology, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1998.
  20. E. Freidson, La Profession Médicale, Payot, Paris, France, 1984.
  21. The College of family physicians of Canada, “Patient-centred primary care in Canada: bring it on home,” Discussion Paper, The College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC), Ontario, Canada, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  22. R. Pineault, J. F. Levesque, M. Breton, M. Hamel, and D. Roberge, “La première ligne: quel rôle pour les organisations publiques, privées et mixtes?” in Le Privé Dans La Santé: Les Discours et Les Faits, F. Béland, A. P. Contandriopoulos, A. Quesnel-Vallée, and L. Robert, Eds., Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  23. Gouvernement du Québec, “Orientations ministérielles relatives à l'organisation des services médicaux de première ligne: paramètres d'organisation: tome 2: La vision et les principes directeurs,” Version Finale. Direction Générale des Services de Santé et Médecine Universitaire, Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, Québec, Canada, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  24. Gouvernement du Québec, Devenir un Groupe de Médecine de Famille (GMF)-Guide D'Accompagnement, Ministère de la Santé et de Services Sociaux, Québec, Canada, 2005.
  25. A. Cassidy, Patient-Centered Medical Homes, Health Affairs, Bethesda, Md, USA, 2010.
  26. S. Béjean, C. Peyron, and R. Urbinelli, “Variations in activity and practice patterns: a French study for GPs,” European Journal of Health Economics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 225–236, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. L. Grignon, V. Paris, D. Polton, A. Couffinhal, and B. Pierrard, “L'influence des modes de rémunération des médecins sur l'efficience du système de soins. Étude no 35,” Number de Catalogue CP32-79/35-2002F-IN, Commission sur l'avenir des Soins de Santé au Canada, Ontario, Canada, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  28. T. Gosden, F. Forland, I. S. Kristiansen et al., “Impact of payment method on behaviour of primary care physicians: a systematic review,” Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 44–55, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. B. L. Andersen, “What determines the behaviour and performance of health professionals? Public service motivation, professional norms and/or economic incentives,” International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 79–97, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. E. Mechanic and S. H. Altman, “Payment reform options: episode payment is a good place to start,” Health Affairs, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. w262–w271, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. Rouleau, Théories Des Organisations, Presses de l'Université du Québec, Québec, Canada, 2007.
  32. N. Touati, R. Pineault, F. Champagne et al., “Evaluating service organization models: the relevance and methodological challenges of a configurational approach,” Evaluation, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 375–401, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. D. Meyer, A. S. Tsui, and C. R. Hinings, “Configurational approaches to organizational analysis,” The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1175–1195, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. P. C. Fiss, “A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1190–1198, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. Rich, “The organizational taxonomy: definition and design,” The Academy of Management Review, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 758–781, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  36. D. J. Ketchen, J. B. Thomas, and C. C. Snow :, “Organizational configurations and performance: a comparison of theorical approaches,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1278–1313, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. C. Short, T. G. Payne, and D. J. Ketchen, “Research on organizational configurations: past accomplishments and future challenges,” Journal of Management, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1053–1079, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. Miller, “Environmental fit versus internal fit,” Organization Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 159–178, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. R. Pineault, P. Lamarche, M. D. Beaulieu et al., “Conceptual and methodological challenges in producing research syntheses for decision-and policy-making: an Illustrative case in primary healthcare,” Evaluation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 137–152, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. Jary and J. Jary, Collins Dictionary of Sociology, Harper Collins, Ontario, Canada, 3rd edition, 2000.
  41. H. E. Aldrich and P. V. Marsden, “Environments and organizations,” in Handbook of Sociology, N. J. Smelser, Ed., Sage Publication, Newbury Park, Calif, USA, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  42. P. A. Lamarche, M. D. Beaulieu, R. Pineault, A. P. Contandriopoulos, J. L. Denis, and J. Haggerty, Choices for Change: The Path for Restructuring Primary Healthcare Services in Canada, Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, Ontario, Canada, 2003.
  43. R. Pineault, J. F. Levesque, P. Tousignant et al., “L'accessibilité et la continuité dans la population: l'influence des modèles d'organisation des services de santé de première ligne,” FCRSS RC1-1091-05, Fondation Canadienne de Recherche sur les Services de Santé, Ontario, Canada, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  44. M. Hamel, R. Pineault, J. F. Levesque et al., “L'organisation des services de santé de première ligne: portrait des services médicaux de première ligne à Montréal et en Montérégie,” Institut NationaL de Santé PubLique du Québec, Direction de Santé Publique de L'Agence de la Santé et des Services Sociaux de MontréaL, Centre de Recherche de L'HôpitaL Charles Lemoyne, Direction de Santé Publique de l’ASSS de Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  45. J. F. Levesque, R. Pineault, B. Simard et al., L'Expérience de Soins de la population: Portrait des Variations Intra-Régionales À Montréal et en Montérégie, Direction de Santé publique, Agence de la Santé et des Services Sociaux de Montréal et Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, Canada, 2007.
  46. R. Pineault, J. F. Levesque, D. Roberge, M. Hamel, P. Lamarche, and J. Haggerty, “Accessibility and continuity of care: a study of primary healthcare in Québec,” Research Report Presented to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Centre de Recherche de L'Hôpital CharLes LeMoyne, Agence de la Santé et des Services Sociaux de MontréaL-Direction de Santé publique, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Direction de Santé Publique de l’ASSS de Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  47. J. L. Haggerty, R. Pineault, M. D. Beaulieu et al., “Practice features associated with patient-reported accessibility, continuity, and coordination of primary health care,” Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 116–123, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. L. Lebart, A. Morineau, and M. Piron, Statistique Exploratoire Multidimensionnelle, Dunod, Paris, France, 3rd edition, 2000.
  49. M. J. Greenacre and J. Blasius, Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences, Elsevier Academic Press, London, UK, 1994.
  50. L. Kaufman and P. J. Rousseeuw, Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005.
  51. L. Lebart, Validation et Rééchantillonnage, Cycle Postgrade de Statistique, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland, 2004.
  52. J. H. Ward, “Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 58, no. 301, pp. 236–244, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. J. P. Nakacha and J. Confais, Approche Pragmatique de la Classification, Technip, Paris, France, 2005.
  54. R. Pineault, S. Provost, M. Hamel, A. Couture, and J. F. Levesque, “The influence of primary health care organizational models on patients' experience of care in different chronic disease situations,” Chronic Diseases in Canada, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 109–120, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. B. Starfield, K. W. Lemke, R. Herbert, W. D. Pavlovich, and G. Anderson, “Comorbidity and the use of primary care and specialist care in the elderly,” Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 215–222, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. D. G. Safran, A. R. Tarlov, and W. H. Rogers, “Primary care performance in fee-for-service and prepaid health care systems: results from the medical outcomes study,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 271, no. 20, pp. 1579–1586, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. D. G. Safran, M. Kosinski, A. R. Tarlov et al., “The primary care assessment survey: tests of data quality and measurement performance,” Medical Care, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 728–739, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. C. Sanmartin and N. Ross, “Experiencing difficulties accessing first-contact health services in Canada,” Healthcare Policy, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 103–119, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  59. K. D. Bailey, Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques, Sage Publications, Iowa City, Iowa, USA, 1994.
  60. W. R. Scott, “The old order change: the evolving world of health care organizations,” in Advances in Health Care Organization Theory, S. S. Mick and M. Wyttenbach, Eds., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  61. C. Demers, Organizational Change Theories: A Synthesis, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2007.
  62. R. Greenwood and C. R. Hinings, “Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change,” Organization Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 293–316, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. J. F. Levesque, R. Pineault, S. Provost et al., “Assessing the evolution of primary healthcare organizations and their performance (2005–2010) in two regions of Québec province: montréal and Montérégie,” BMC Family Practice, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 95, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. R. B. Da Silva, La pratique médicale des omnipraticiens: Influence des contextes organisationnel et géographique [Ph.D. thesis], Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada, 2010.
  65. J. W. Begun and R. D. Luke, “Factors underlying organizational change in local health care markets, 1982-1995,” Health Care Management Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 62–72, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. D. Miller and H. Mintzberg, “The case for configuration,” in Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, G. Morgan, Ed., pp. 1–424, Sage Publication, Beverly Hills, Calif, USA, 1983. View at Google Scholar