The Social Attribution Task-Multiple Choice (SAT-MC): A Psychometric and Equivalence Study of an Alternate Form

Table 5

SAT-MC and BLERT correlation comparison.

	SAT-MC + SAT-MC-II Combined sample	BLERT	William’s T2^1
Gender	.07	.00	𝑡=−.58
Age^2	−.01	.03	𝑡=.30
SAT^3	.08	.16	𝑡=.66
SAS	−.07	.15	𝑡=.66
SPQ	−.12	−.09	𝑡=.24
BRIA Ego^4	−.10	.01	𝑡=.90
Social activities	−.06	−.06	𝑡=.00
Picture comp	.02	.28**	𝑡=2.23 *

Values reflect Pearson 𝑟 correlation coefficients with two-tailed tests.
Statistical significance: *𝑃<.05, **𝑃<.01.
¹Differences in the strength of correlations between SAT-MC, collapsed across versions (𝑁=92), and the BLERT were tested across demographic and validation measures by Williams’s T2 statistic using a two-tailed t distribution, df=89 unless otherwise indicated.
²Age reported by 𝑁=79, df=76.
³Scholastic Aptitude test score, reported by 𝑁=90, df=87.
⁴BRIA data was incomplete for 2 participants, and useable data was collected for 𝑁=90, df=87.