International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2013 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 859154 |

Dominique Gales, Clarence Clark, Upender Manne, Temesgen Samuel, "The Chemokine CXCL8 in Carcinogenesis and Drug Response", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2013, Article ID 859154, 8 pages, 2013.

The Chemokine CXCL8 in Carcinogenesis and Drug Response

Academic Editor: P. Balaram
Received17 Jun 2013
Accepted08 Sep 2013
Published09 Oct 2013


Although the functions of chemokines in the regulation of immune processes have been studied in some detail, the role of these biomolecules in cancer is not fully understood. Chemokines mediate migration of immune cells and other functions related to immunity. They are also involved in oncogenesis and in tumor progression, invasion, and metastasis through mechanisms similar to their roles in immune functions. Various chemokines also promote cell proliferation and resistance to apoptosis of stressed cells. Consequently, chemokines and their receptors present potential therapeutic targets for anticancer drugs. The chemokine CXCL8, also known as interleukin-8 (IL8), is a proinflammatory molecule that has functions within the tumor microenvironment. Due to its potent angiogenic effects and the activity of the chemokine and its receptors in the promotion of invasion and metastasis, CXCL8 and its receptors are now considered as attractive targets for cancer therapy. This review relates the current understanding of the regulation, signaling, and functions of CXCL8 that contribute to tumor growth and metastasis, and of its role in drug response.

1. Introduction

Chemokines, a family of structurally related 8–10 kDa protein molecules, are secreted in diverse tissue environments and are characterized by their involvement in the regulation of hematopoietic cells and inflammatory processes [1, 2]. To date, more than 50 chemokines, which signal through about 20 G-protein-coupled receptors, have been identified [1, 3, 4].

Chemokines are divided into 4 subfamilies (C, CC, CXC, and CX3C), based on their primary structure or function. The structural basis for their classification is the location of the main cysteine residues in their N terminal regions [57]. Functionally, chemokines are categorized as “inflammatory” or “homeostatic.” Inflammatory chemokines are released primarily in response to infections; homeostatic chemokines are constitutively secreted at specific sites in the body, such as in the lymphoid organs, where they serve to attract cells that express cognate receptors [812].

Although genetic alterations determine the cell of origin of cancer, microenvironmental factors are now known to control the development and progression of the malignant process; hence, these factors are included as a new paradigm in Hallmarks of Cancer [13]. In addition to cancer cells, the tumor microenvironment includes fibroblasts, endothelial cells, macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and mast cells, all of which respond to various stimuli and communicate through contact and by secreted mediators.

2. Chemokines and the “Inflamed” Tumor Microenvironment

As in infection-associated inflammatory processes, chemokines are the driving forces for immune cell infiltration into tumor tissues [14, 15]. This raises a question of whether the increased production of chemokines in tumors is an indication of progression to malignancy or a defensive reaction to an “inflammatory state” created by malignant cells. The link between an inflammatory state and cancer can be viewed from a cell-intrinsic perspective, for which genetic lesions (e.g., Ras or RET activation) initiate inflammatory signaling and an “inflamed” microenvironment; and from an extrinsic perspective, for which infection and subsequent chronic inflammation drive mechanisms that result in oncogenesis [1618]. In either case, cancers associated with inflammation are generally aggressive.

Through cellular and acellular components, chemokines, growth factors, and growth factor receptors, there is a complex intratumoral communication network that results in a microenvironment resembling a site of microbial infection. While the need for an effective immune response to an infection by a pathogen is evident, the infiltration of immune cells into an organ (or tumor) [19] could be considered as a reaction analogous to that of a local infection. Such infiltrating immune cells may have a role in the earliest stages of oncogenesis before the growing tumor requires a vascular supply, and when clearance of dead cells and debris is needed. Since immune cells recognize and remove cells with altered expression of cell surface markers [20], the complex signaling network in the microenvironment could lead either to progression or rejection of the tumor. In such a scenario, chemokines are considered to have dual functions, on one hand by supporting the immune system to coordinate antitumor immunity and, on the other hand, by facilitating the release of factors that promote angiogenesis and the recruitment of immunoregulatory cells, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells. The latter process supports tumor development rather than rejection [21, 22].

Many chemokines and their receptors expressed by both epithelial and stromal cells are associated with cancer progression [19, 23, 24]. Chemokines that contribute to immune infiltration into tumor sites and tumor growth include the growth-related (GRO) family of chemokines (CXCL1, 2 and 3) and CXCL8. These chemokines, primarily through the receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2, stimulate angiogenesis and respond to the activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), a major mediator of inflammation [8, 25].

CXCL8 is one of the dominant transcriptional targets of the inflammatory signaling mediated by nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), which is commonly activated in cancer cells. CXCL8 is a proinflammatory chemokine that acts on leukocytes and endothelial cells, via their CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors, to promote immune infiltration and angiogenesis, which in turn establishes a venue for cancer cell local invasion, migration, and metastasis [26]. As an angiogenic chemokine, CXCL8 binds with high affinity to both the CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors, contributing to its function in the cancer microenvironment. The present review focuses on the function of CXCL8, as it relates to oncogenic processes and to drug response.

3. CXCL8 as a Chemokine

CXCL8, also known as interleukin 8 (IL-8), is a CXC-type chemokine originally identified as a leukocyte chemoattractant [27, 28]. The CXCL8 gene encodes for a precursor protein of 99 amino acids, which, upon processing, yields active proteins of either 77 amino acids in nonimmune cells or 72 amino acids in monocytes and macrophages [29, 30]. CXCL8 signals through CXCR1 and CXCR2 G-protein-coupled receptors [31, 32].

In the context of tumors, an essential effect of CXCL8 is its initiation of leucocyte infiltration and neovascularization, which precede invasion and metastasis. This tumor progression may occur as a function of the regulation of angiogenesis, cell motility, immune cell infiltration, cell growth and survival in the microenvironment, and modulation of local antitumor immune responses. CXCL8 enhances the proliferation and survival of endothelial cells and up-regulates the expression of two matrix metalloproteinases, MMP-2 and MMP-9 [3335]. CXCL8 also mimics the function of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), trans-activates VEGF-R2, and promotes angiogenesis [36]. In cancer models of the liver, pancreas, colorectum, and melanoma, CXCL8 functions as an autocrine growth factor [26, 3741].

This evidence indicates that CXCL8, produced in an inflammatory microenvironment, aggravates the inflammatory state and enables cancer cells to survive and to migrate from the primary site.

4. Regulation of CXCL8 Expression

Research into the role of CXCL8 in cancer has been hampered by the lack of a homologous gene in the mouse, the common animal model for studies of human cancer, and by the functional overlap between various chemokines [27]. Therefore, the knowledge about the CXCL8 gene and its regulation is derived mostly from cultured or isolated cells. For the same reasons, translational application of knowledge of CXCL8 biology is also complicated. The most clinically relevant human data on CXCL8 refer to the correlation between high serum levels of the chemokine and poor prognoses, [42, 43] suggesting that patients expressing high levels of inflammatory cytokines or affected by inflammatory types of cancers are at a high risk of having aggressive cancers. Cancers associated with inflammation generally display the characteristics of aggressiveness [15, 44]. Since CXCL8 is not the only chemokine expressed under such circumstances, determination of its specific role is difficult.

Various signals and/or pathways induce CXCL8 expression in cancers [40]. The activation of oncogenes may be linked to inflammatory signaling via the cell-intrinsic mechanism described above. For instance, the RAS-RAF signaling pathway activates the NF-κB transcription factor, which in turn leads to the production of numerous cytokines [45]. Some of these cytokines (e.g., CXCL8 and IL-6) are proinflammatory, and their continued production supports the transformation of cells into malignancy and invasiveness [4648]. Moreover, there is persistent NF-κB activation in cancers associated with chronic inflammation [4852]. Tumor angiogenesis, growth, and metastasis are also facilitated by NF-κB-induced transcription of genes for cytokines and other proteins. In addition to NF-κB, activator protein-1 (AP1) also regulates the expression of CXCL8 [53], and there is a possible involvement of EGFR signaling in the regulation of CXCL8 production/expression [54].

Once expression of CXCL8 has been induced, this chemokine may also feed forward to activate NF-κB and to exacerbate the inflammatory cycle [55]. For example, there is a correlation between CXCL8 expression and growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis of colon carcinoma cells after activation of NF-κB [56]. Although cytokine-mediated activation of NF-κB is the main mechanism for transcriptional induction of chemokines, NF-κB may cooperate with other pathways in this process. The transcription of CXCL8 is modulated mainly through an NF-κB response element that works in concert with adjacent AP1 and elements of nuclear factor induced by IL-6 (NF-IL-6) [30, 57].

5. CXCL8 Signaling

CXCL8 signals through CXCR1 and CXCR2, receptors present in various types of normal as well as cancerous cells. These are targets for autocrine and paracrine signaling by CXCL8 and other chemokines that use these receptors [3, 58]. Since CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors are expressed on cancer cells, endothelial cells, neutrophils, and tumor-associated macrophages, the synthesis and secretion of CXCL8 from tumor cells affects the tumor microenvironment [8]. Hence, CXCL8 signaling is involved in regulating the communication between these cell types within the tumor microenvironment (Figure 1). Despite the dominant effect of CXCL8, the dynamics of chemokine release and activity in the tumor microenvironment are complex, and the balance between CXCL8 and other cytokines should be considered. Again, analogous to the scenario of exposure to a foreign pathogen or antigen, the success or failure of antitumor immunity could be determined by the net balance of the effector cytokines in the microenvironment.

Phosphtidylinositol-3 (PI3) is a component in CXCR1/2-signaling. The enzyme PI3-kinase (PI3K) is a principal effector of CXCL8-mediated chemotaxis in neutrophils. This increased phosphorylation results in the activation and increased expression of the serine/threonine kinase, PKB/Akt [5961]. CXCL8 may also regulate the activity of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade in ovarian cancers, where there is a crosstalk with the EGFR pathway through the activation of CXCR1/2 [62]. Similarly, CXCL8 activates the classical MAPK signaling cascade, with downstream phosphorylation of Erk1/2 in neutrophils and cancer cells [63]. Activation of MAPK signaling is consistent with the promotion, by IL-8, of proliferation and survival for various types of cells [63, 64]. The classical cascade between Erk and MAPK signaling describes a pathway linking CXCL8 to the activation of E2F and activator protein transcription factors, the main function of which is to regulate the transcription of genes associated with cell proliferation [17, 46, 65].

In endothelial and cancer cells, protein tyrosine kinases are farther downstream in the IL-8 signaling pathway. Additionally, CXCL8 induces the activation of VEGFR-2 in endothelial cells [66]. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and Src-kinases are also activated in cancer cells stimulated with CXCL8 [67]. Activation of Src and FAK signaling is consistent with increases in cellular proliferation, survival, and chemoresistance, and with regulation of cell spreading, motility, and invasion [68]. As a result of multiple pathways being triggered in response to CXCL8 signaling, transcription factors may be activated in cells exposed to this chemokine.

Signaling through CXCR2 leads to senescence, especially in p53-proficient and nontransformed cells [69]. Since CXCR2 has multiple ligands; however, the specific contribution of CXCL8 to senescence has not been established. In contrast, a role for IL-6, another proinflammatory cytokine, in senescence and in relation to the senescence-associated secretory phenotype has been established [47, 70]. The principal mechanisms of CXCL8 regulation and signaling are summarized in Figure 1.

6. Role of CXCL8 in Cancer Progression and Metastasis

In addition to the lack of a homologous genetic model, efforts to determine the function of CXCL8 in cancer progression are complicated by redundancy of the chemokines that share CXCR1 and CXCR2, and by the expression of cytokines other than CXCL8 in response to an upstream stimulus. Even in the absence of CXCL8, chemokines such as CXCL1 and CXCL6 would still attract immune cells to the “inflamed” site [8]. CXCL8 promotes cancer cell proliferation, survival, and migration via its autocrine and paracrine activity, and it elicits an angiogenic response in endothelial cells and chemotaxis of neutrophils to the tumor site via its paracrine activity [6, 7173]. Since, in the microenvironment, tumor cells are surrounded by fibroblasts, dendritic cells, tumor-associated macrophages, and other cells of lymphoid origin; CXCL8 produced by tumor cells could act on one or more of these cells, producing other cytokines, growth factors, and/or MMPs. In addition to the local effects of these chemokines, metastasis of cancer cells is facilitated by CXCL8 and its receptors on tumor cells, which enables them to undergo the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and then to migrate and seed at secondary sites [3, 54, 7477]. Moreover, in response to stress, stromal cells produce CXCL8, which may influence the invasiveness and/or metastatic potential of cancer cells [78, 79].

Chemokines and their receptors are involved in directing organ-specific metastasis to regional lymph nodes and to other sites where the ligands are expressed [25, 80]. As stated above, such migration of cancer cells is analogous to the migration of antigen-presenting cells from their sites of normal residence. Under the classical response to a localized infection, professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) process and present antigenic epitopes to effector cells, characteristically through a process that includes an APC chemokine response, epithelial-mesenchymal-transition, and migration to the draining/local lymphoid tissues [8183]. In doing so, the APCs mount and coordinate a defense against a foreign pathogen.

Consistent with this analogy, once recruited into the tumor, infiltrating APCs would be expected to coordinate the immune response against malignant cells. It could also be anticipated that, in the absence of a foreign antigen signature (a pathogen-associated molecular pattern), the action of recruited APCs would be to recruit suppressor regulatory immune cells and to subdue any anticancer activity of effector cells in the tumor microenvironment, a process analogous to the “resolution phase” after control of a pathogen-associated inflammatory reaction [84]. Under this circumstance, owing to the permissive microenvironment and to the loss of sensitivity to environmental cues that normally restrict unregulated proliferation of cells, malignant cells would continue to expand, invade, and emulate the migratory (metastatic) path of professional APCs to regional and distant sites.

Regarding the role of CXCL8, a question is whether or not primary cancer cells and their metastatic derivatives differ in their expression and secretion of CXCL8. Other questions are: (a) if the primary cancer cells utilize CXCL8- (and/or other cytokine) mediated mechanisms to migrate and establish a metastatic site, would further expression of these chemokines at the new site be essential? (b) Are metastatic sites equally infiltrated by leukocytes? (c) What is the frequency of secondary metastasis from the first metastatic site? Answers to these questions could help us understand if therapeutic approaches targeted to cytokines would be beneficial against a cancer that has already metastasized.

7. CXCL8 and Drug Response

Multiple reports indicate that chemokines and their receptors are valid targets for new therapeutic agents against cancer. An evident challenge in this approach is the chemokine response to chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapies.

During cancer therapy, NF-κB signaling is involved in orchestrating chemokine responses. In addition to being aberrantly activated in cancer cells, NF-κB is activated by most modalities of cancer therapy [8587], and aberrant activation of NF-κB is proposed as a major factor contributing to the resistance to chemotherapy. Studies conducted with cultured cells show that inhibition of NF-κB, by drugs or natural compounds, sensitizes cells to apoptosis through inhibition of the expression of antiapoptotic genes [88, 89].

Evaluated in cancer patients, CXCL8 expression might be used to assess the patient’s prognosis and response to chemotherapy. In various types of human cancers, high levels of CXCL8 in serum or at local sites correlate with aggressive disease and poor initial response to drugs, including oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, paclitaxel, and camptothecin [53, 9094]. In contrast, paclitaxel, camptothecin, and erlotinib increase CXCL8 transcription and secretion in cancer cells [95, 96] (and our unpublished data). Thus, the significance of CXCL8 in modulating the response of cancer cells to chemotherapy is still not fully understood. Nevertheless, the potential use of CXCL8 as a diagnostic or prognostic marker has been advocated [97, 98].

The concept of developing treatment strategies to alter the tumor microenvironment or to interrupt interactions between cancer cells and their environment is gaining momentum [99]. Nevertheless, there are questions that remain unanswered regarding the complex chemokine system. For example, direct targeting of NF-κB components, NF-κB transcriptional targets, and antagonizing chemokine receptors or downstream signaling seem to be attractive strategies to increase the effectiveness of chemotherapy and radiation. Since inflammatory mechanisms that are associated with chronic infections, autoimmune diseases, and cancer overlap functionally, knowledge gained from these diseases should be assimilated. Indeed, some CXCR1 and 2 antagonists, initially developed for inflammatory diseases, are currently under consideration for or actually in clinical trials for cancer therapy ( [100104].

8. Conclusion

The chemokine and chemokine receptor signaling networks are important not only from immunological perspectives but also as factors in cancer progression and metastasis and as modulators of responses to chemotherapy and radiation. CXCL8, a cytokine induced by activated NF-κB signaling, appears to be involved in these mechanisms. Further studies will reveal how such information can be used to develop new strategies to prevent or treat cancer. Just as the outcome of an infection or vaccination is determined by the balance of chemokine responses, the fate of a tumor, whether it stays benign and for how long, whether it spreads and how fast and where to, whether it is rejected or accepted by immune cells, and whether a given therapeutic agent eliminates or exacerbates its growth, may be determined by the dominance of certain chemokines, their receptors, and signaling partners in cells in the tumor microenvironment. In this respect, the regulators, receptors, signaling pathways, and effectors of chemokines such as CXCL8 provide attractive targets for cancer therapeutic intervention. Furthermore, serum or tissue levels of CXCL8 and its receptors could prove to be useful as biomarkers for prognosis, drug efficacy, and/or drug responses.


The authors thank Dr. Donald Hill for his critical suggestions and editorial help. Research in the authors’ laboratories is supported by NIH Grants U54CA118623 and Tuskegee University RCMI shared instrumentation core facility Grant G12MD007585.


  1. S. A. Lira and G. C. Furtado, “The biology of chemokines and their receptors,” Immunologic Research, vol. 54, no. 1–3, pp. 111–120, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Zlotnik and O. Yoshie, “Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity,” Immunity, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  3. F. Balkwill, “Cancer and the chemokine network,” Nature Reviews, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 540–550, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  4. D. Raman, P. J. Baugher, Y. M. Thu, and A. Richmond, “Role of chemokines in tumor growth,” Cancer Letters, vol. 256, no. 2, pp. 137–165, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Baggiolini, B. Dewald, and B. Moser, “Human chemokines: an update,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 15, pp. 675–705, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. Opdenakker and J. van Damme, “Chemotactic factors, passive invasion and metastasis of cancer cells,” Immunology Today, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 463–464, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  7. D. Rossi and A. Zlotnik, “The biology of chemokines and their receptors,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 18, pp. 217–242, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Vandercappellen, J. van Damme, and S. Struyf, “The role of CXC chemokines and their receptors in cancer,” Cancer Letters, vol. 267, no. 2, pp. 226–244, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. N. Mueller, K. A. Hosiawa-Meagher, B. T. Konieczny et al., “Regulation of homeostatic chemokine expression and cell trafficking during immune responses,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5838, pp. 670–674, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. G. Cyster, “Chemokines, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 23, pp. 127–159, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. D. Miller and M. S. Krangel, “Biology and biochemistry of the chemokines: a family of chemotactic and inflammatory cytokines,” Critical Reviews in Immunology, vol. 12, no. 1-2, pp. 17–46, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  12. D. Arenberg, “Chemokines in the biology of lung cancer,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 287–288, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, “Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 646–674, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Brigati, D. M. Noonan, A. Albini, and R. Benelli, “Tumors and inflammatory infiltrates: friends or foes?” Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 247–258, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Erreni, A. Mantovani, and P. Allavena, “Tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and inflammation in colorectal cancer,” Cancer Microenvironment, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 141–154, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Mantovani, P. Allavena, A. Sica, and F. Balkwill, “Cancer-related inflammation,” Nature, vol. 454, no. 7203, pp. 436–444, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Sparmann and D. Bar-Sagi, “Ras-induced interleukin-8 expression plays a critical role in tumor growth and angiogenesis,” Cancer Cell, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 447–458, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. G. Borrello, D. Degl'Innocenti, and M. A. Pierotti, “Inflammation and cancer: the oncogene-driven connection,” Cancer Letters, vol. 267, no. 2, pp. 262–270, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Egeblad, E. S. Nakasone, and Z. Werb, “Tumors as organs: complex tissues that interface with the entire organism,” Developmental Cell, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 884–901, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  20. S. L. Topalian, G. J. Weiner, and D. M. Pardoll, “Cancer immunotherapy comes of age,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 36, pp. 4828–4836, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. J. Grimshaw and F. R. Balkwill, “Inhibition of monocyte and macrophage chemotaxis by hypoxia and inflammation—a potential mechanism,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 480–489, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  22. L. A. Khawli, P. Hu, and A. L. Epstein, “Cytokine, chemokine, and co-stimulatory fusion proteins for the immunotherapy of solid tumors,” in Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol. 181, pp. 291–328, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  23. R. Bonecchi, M. Locati, and A. Mantovani, “Chemokines and cancer: a fatal attraction,” Cancer Cell, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 434–435, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. Farrow, D. Albo, and D. H. Berger, “The role of the tumor microenvironment in the progression of pancreatic cancer,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 319–328, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Lazennec and A. Richmond, “Chemokines and chemokine receptors: new insights into cancer-related inflammation,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 133–144, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. Schadendorf, A. Moller, B. Algermissen, M. Worm, M. Sticherling, and B. M. Czarnetzki, “IL-8 produced by human malignant melanoma cells in vitro is an essential autocrine growth factor,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 2667–2675, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  27. B. J. Rollins, “Where the confusion began: cloning the first chemokine receptors,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 5, pp. 2893–2894, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Matsushima, E. T. Baldwin, and N. Mukaida, “Interleukin-8 and MCAF: novel leukocyte recruitment and activating cytokines,” Chemical Immunology, vol. 51, pp. 236–265, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  29. R. M. Strieter, S. L. Kunkel, H. J. Showell et al., “Endothelial cell gene expression of a neutrophil chemotactic factor by TNF-α, LPS, and IL-1β,” Science, vol. 243, no. 4897, pp. 1467–1469, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  30. D. J. Brat, A. C. Bellail, and E. G. van Meir, “The role of interleukin-8 and its receptors in gliomagenesis and tumoral angiogenesis,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 122–133, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. W. E. Holmes, J. Lee, W. J. Kuang, G. C. Rice, and W. I. Wood, “Structure and functional expression of a human interleukin-8 receptor,” Science, vol. 253, no. 5025, pp. 1278–1280, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  32. P. M. Murphy and H. L. Tiffany, “Cloning of complementary DNA encoding a functional human interleukin-8 receptor,” Science, vol. 253, no. 5025, pp. 1280–1283, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  33. E. Azenshtein, T. Meshel, S. Shina, N. Barak, I. Keydar, and A. Ben-Baruch, “The angiogenic factors CXCL8 and VEGF in breast cancer: regulation by an array of pro-malignancy factors,” Cancer Letters, vol. 217, no. 1, pp. 73–86, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Brysse, M. Mestdagt, M. Polette et al., “Regulation of CXCL8/IL-8 expression by zonula occludens-1 in human breast cancer cells,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 121–132, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. Balkwill, “Chemokine biology in cancer,” Seminars in Immunology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. M. Zhu and P. J. Woll, “Mitogenic effects of interleukin-8/CXCL8 on cancer cells,” Future Oncology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 699–704, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. R. Brew, J. S. Erikson, D. C. West, A. R. Kinsella, J. Slavin, and S. E. Christmas, “Interleukin-8 as an autocrine growth factor for human colon carcinoma cells in vitro,” Cytokine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Miyamoto, Y. Shimizu, K. Okada, Y. Kashii, K. Higuchi, and A. Watanabe, “Effect of interleukin-8 on production of tumor-associated substances and autocrine growth of human liver and pancreatic cancer cells,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 47–57, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Li, M. L. Varney, and R. K. Singh, “Constitutive expression of growth regulated oncogene (gro) in human colon carcinoma cells with different metastatic potential and its role in regulating their metastatic phenotype,” Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 571–579, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. Y. M. Zhu, S. J. Webster, D. Flower, and P. J. Woll, “Interleukin-8/CXCL8 is a growth factor for human lung cancer cells,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 1970–1976, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Li, M. L. Varney, J. Valasek, M. Godfrey, B. J. Dave, and R. K. Singh, “Autocrine role of interleukin-8 in induction of endothelial cell proliferation, survival, migration and MMP-2 production and angiogenesis,” Angiogenesis, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Y. Ren, R. T. Poon, H. T. Tsui et al., “Interleukin-8 serum levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: correlations with clinicopathological features and prognosis,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 16, part 1, pp. 5996–6001, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  43. T. Ueda, E. Shimada, and T. Urakawa, “Serum levels of cytokines in patients with colorectal cancer: possible involvement of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in hematogenous metastasis,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 423–429, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. F. Balkwill and A. Mantovani, “Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow?” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9255, pp. 539–545, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Mantovani, R. Bonecchi, and M. Locati, “Tuning inflammation and immunity by chemokine sequestration: decoys and more,” Nature Reviews, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 907–918, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. B. B. Aggarwal and B. Sung, “NF-κB in cancer: a matter of life and death,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 469–471, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  47. F. Rodier, J.-P. Coppé, C. K. Patil et al., “Persistent DNA damage signalling triggers senescence-associated inflammatory cytokine secretion,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 973–979, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Terzić, S. Grivennikov, E. Karin, and M. Karin, “Inflammation and colon cancer,” Gastroenterology, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 2101.e5–2114.e5, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. F. R. Greten, L. Eckmann, T. F. Greten et al., “IKKβ links inflammation and tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer,” Cell, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 285–296, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. Maeda, M. Akanuma, Y. Mitsuno et al., “Distinct mechanism of helicobacter pylori-mediated NF-κB activation between gastric cancer cells and monocytic cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 48, pp. 44856–44864, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. A. Sharma, M. K. R. Tummuru, M. J. Blaser, and L. D. Kerr, “Activation of IL-8 gene expression by Helicobacter pylori is regulated by transcription factor nuclear factor-κB in gastric epithelial cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, no. 5, pp. 2401–2407, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  52. C.-Y. Wu, C.-J. Wang, C.-C. Tseng et al., “Helicobacter pylori promote gastric cancer cells invasion through a NF-κB and COX-2-mediated pathway,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 11, no. 21, pp. 3197–3203, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  53. N. S. Rial, G. Lazennec, A. R. Prasad, R. S. Krouse, P. Lance, and E. W. Gerner, “Regulation of deoxycholate induction of CXCL8 by the adenomatous polyposis coli gene in colorectal cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 124, no. 10, pp. 2270–2280, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. Y. Zhang, L. Wang, M. Zhang, M. Jin, C. Bai, and X. Wang, “Potential mechanism of interleukin-8 production from lung cancer cells: an involvement of EGF-EGFR-PI3K-Akt-Erk pathway,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. Li, M. L. Varney, and R. K. Singh, “Expression of interleukin 8 and its receptors in human colon carcinoma cells with different metastatic potentials,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 3298–3304, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  56. R. K. Singh, M. Gutman, R. Radinsky, C. D. Bucana, and I. J. Fidler, “Expression of interleukin 8 correlates with the metastatic potential of human melanoma cells in nude mice,” Cancer Research, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 3242–3247, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  57. Q. Wang, N. Huber, G. Noel et al., “NF-κβ inhibition is ineffective in blocking cytokine-induced IL-8 production but P38 and STAT1 inhibitors are effective,” Inflammation Research, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 977–985, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. H. Kulbe, N. R. Levinson, F. Balkwill, and J. L. Wilson, “The chemokine network in cancer—much more than directing cell movement,” International Journal of Developmental Biology, vol. 48, no. 5-6, pp. 489–496, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. I. U. Schraufstatter, J. Chung, and M. Burger, “IL-8 activates endothelial cell CXCR1 and CXCR2 through Rho and Rac signaling pathways,” American Journal of Physiology: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 280, no. 6, pp. L1094–L1103, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  60. M. Q. Li, X. Z. Luo, Y. H. Meng et al., “CXCL8 enhances proliferation and growth and reduces apoptosis in endometrial stromal cells in an autocrine manner via a CXCR1-triggered PTEN/AKT signal pathway,” Human Reproduction, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 2107–2116, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. H. C. Lane, A. R. Anand, and R. K. Ganju, “Cbl and Akt regulate CXCL8-induced and CXCR1- and CXCR2-mediated chemotaxis,” International Immunology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1315–1325, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. G. Venkatakrishnan, R. Salgia, and J. E. Groopman, “Chemokine receptors CXCR-1/2 activate mitogen-activated protein kinase via the epidermal growth factor receptor in ovarian cancer cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 10, pp. 6868–6875, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. F. Luppi, A. M. Longo, W. I. de Boer, K. F. Rabe, and P. S. Hiemstra, “Interleukin-8 stimulates cell proliferation in non-small cell lung cancer through epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation,” Lung Cancer, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. C. F. MacManus, J. Pettigrew, A. Seaton et al., “Interleukin-8 signaling promotes translational regulation of cyclin D in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 737–748, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. R. M. Richardson, H. Ali, B. C. Pridgen, B. Haribabu, and R. Snyderman, “Multiple signaling pathways of human interleukin-8 receptor A: independent regulation by phosphorylation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 17, pp. 10690–10695, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. K. Inoue, J. W. Slaton, B. Y. Eve et al., “Interleukin 8 expression regulates tumorigenicity and metastases in androgen-independent prostate cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 2104–2119, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  67. M. Karin and F. R. Greten, “NF-κB: linking inflammation and immunity to cancer development and progression,” Nature Reviews, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 749–759, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. P. M. F. Siesser and S. K. Hanks, “The signaling and biological implications of FAK overexpression in cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 11, part 1, pp. 3233–3237, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. J. C. Acosta, A. O'Loghlen, A. Banito et al., “Chemokine signaling via the CXCR2 receptor reinforces senescence,” Cell, vol. 133, no. 6, pp. 1006–1018, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. T. Kuilman, C. Michaloglou, L. C. W. Vredeveld et al., “Oncogene-induced senescence relayed by an interleukin-dependent inflammatory network,” Cell, vol. 133, no. 6, pp. 1019–1031, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. A. Vincent-Salomon and J. P. Thiery, “Host microenvironment in breast cancer development: epithelia-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer development,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 101–106, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. B. B. McConnell and V. W. Yang, “The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer,” Current Colorectal Cancer Reports, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 69–74, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. A. J. Wilson, K. Byron, and P. R. Gibson, “Interleukin-8 stimulates the migration of human colonic epithelial cells in vitro,” Clinical Science, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 385–390, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. X. J. Li, L. X. Peng, J. Y. Shao et al., “As an independent unfavorable prognostic factor, IL-8 promotes metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma through induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and activation of AKT signaling,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1302–1309, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. W. E. Holmes, J. Lee, W. J. Kuang, G. C. Rice, and W. I. Wood, “Structure and functional expression of a human interleukin-8 receptor. Science. 1991. 253: 1278-1280,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 5, pp. 2895–2897, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  76. R. I. Fernando, M. D. Castillo, M. Litzinger, D. H. Hamilton, and C. Palena, “IL-8 signaling plays a critical role in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of human carcinoma cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 15, pp. 5296–5306, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. H. Iguchi, M. Ono, K. Matsushima, and M. Kuwano, “Overproduction of IL-8 results in suppression of bone metastasis by lung cancer cells in vivo,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 329–333, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  78. N. Mukaida, “Pathophysiological roles of interleukin-8/CXCL8 in pulmonary diseases,” American Journal of Physiology: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 284, no. 4, pp. L566–L577, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  79. J.-P. Coppé, C. K. Patil, F. Rodier et al., “Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor,” PLoS Biology, vol. 6, no. 12, article e301, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. A. Müller, B. Homey, H. Soto et al., “Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis,” Nature, vol. 410, no. 6824, pp. 50–56, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. J. V. den Bossche, B. Malissen, A. Mantovani, P. de Baetselier, and J. A. van Ginderachter, “Regulation and function of the E-cadherin/catenin complex in cells of the monocyte-macrophage lineage and DCs,” Blood, vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 1623–1633, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. A. Saalbach, C. Klein, J. Sleeman et al., “Dermal fibroblasts induce maturation of dendritic cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 8, pp. 4966–4974, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  83. M. B. Lutz and G. Schuler, “Immature, semi-mature and fully mature dendritic cells: which signals induce tolerance or immunity?” Trends in Immunology, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 445–449, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. I. Tabas and C. K. Glass, “Anti-inflammatory therapy in chronic disease: challenges and opportunities,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6116, pp. 166–172, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. T. T. Huang, S. M. Wuerzberger-Davis, B. J. Seufzer et al., “NF-κB activation by camptothecin. A linkage between nuclear dna damage and cytoplasmic signaling events,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 13, pp. 9501–9509, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. A. V. Prasad, N. Mohan, B. Chandrasekar, and M. L. Meltz, “Activation of nuclear factor κB in human lymphoblastoid cells by low-dose ionizing radiation,” Radiation Research, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 367–372, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. H. L. Pahl, “Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-κB transcription factors,” Oncogene, vol. 18, no. 49, pp. 6853–6866, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  88. J. Huang, J. L. Yao, L. Zhang et al., “Differential expression of interleukin-8 and its receptors in the neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine compartments of prostate cancer,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 166, no. 6, pp. 1807–1815, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  89. A. C. Bharti and B. B. Aggarwal, “Nuclear factor-κ B and cancer: its role in prevention and therapy,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 64, no. 5-6, pp. 883–888, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. A. Bellocq, M. Antoine, A. Flahault et al., “Neutrophil alveolitis in bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: induction by tumor-derived interleukin-8 and relation to clinical outcome,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  91. M. Haraguchi, K. Komuta, A. Akashi, S. Matsuzaki, J. Furui, and T. Kanematsu, “Elevated IL-8 levels in the drainage vein of resectable Dukes' C colorectal cancer indicate high risk for developing hepatic metastasis,” Oncology Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 159–165, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  92. T. Kantola, K. Klintrup, J. P. Väyrynen et al., “Stage-dependent alterations of the serum cytokine pattern in colorectal carcinoma,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 107, no. 10, pp. 1729–1736, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. H. Kuniyasu, W. Yasui, H. Shinohara et al., “Induction of angiogenesis by hyperplastic colonic mucosa adjacent to colon cancer,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 157, no. 5, pp. 1523–1535, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  94. S. L. McCarron, S. Edwards, P. R. Evans et al., “Influence of cytokine gene polymorphisms on the development of prostate cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 3369–3372, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  95. T. S. Collins, L.-F. Lee, and J. P.-Y. Ting, “Paclitaxel up-regulates interleukin-8 synthesis in human lung carcinoma through an NF-κB- and AP-1-dependent mechanism,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 78–84, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. C. Wilson, P. J. Maxwell, D. B. Longley, R. H. Wilson, P. G. Johnston, and D. J. J. Waugh, “Constitutive and treatment-induced CXCL8-signalling selectively modulates the efficacy of anti-metabolite therapeutics in metastatic prostate cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 5, Article ID e36545, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. F. Biasi, T. Guina, M. Maina et al., “Progressive increase of matrix metalloprotease-9 and interleukin-8 serum levels during carcinogenic process in human colorectal tract,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 7, Article ID e41839, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. S. Bünger, U. Haug, F. M. Kelly et al., “Toward standardized high-throughput serum diagnostics: multiplex-protein array identifies IL-8 and VEGF as serum markers for colon cancer,” Journal of Biomolecular Screening, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1018–1026, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. V. I. F. Slettenaar and J. L. Wilson, “The chemokine network: a target in cancer biology?” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 962–974, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. K. L. Widdowson, J. D. Elliott, D. F. Veber et al., “Evaluation of potent and selective small-molecule antagonists for the CXCR2 chemokine receptor,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1319–1321, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. M. L. Varney, S. Singh, A. Li, R. Mayer-Ezell, R. Bond, and R. K. Singh, “Small molecule antagonists for CXCR2 and CXCR1 inhibit human colon cancer liver metastases,” Cancer Letters, vol. 300, no. 2, pp. 180–188, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. S. Singh, A. Sadanandam, K. C. Nannuru et al., “Small-molecule antagonists for CXCR2 and CXCR1 inhibit human melanoma growth by decreasing tumor cell proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 2380–2386, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. J. Busch-Petersen, “Small molecule antagonists of the CXCR2 and CXCR1 chemokine receptors as therapeutic agents for the treatment of inflammatory diseases,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 6, no. 13, pp. 1345–1352, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  104. Y. Ning, M. J. Labonte, W. Zhang et al., “The CXCR2 antagonist, SCH-527123, shows antitumor activity and sensitizes cells to oxaliplatin in preclinical colon cancer models,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1353–1364, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Dominique Gales et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.