International Scholarly Research Notices / 2013 / Article / Tab 2 / Review Article
Tooth-Implant Connection: A Review Table 2 Success rate of Implant and tooth-implant supported prosthesis.
Author Type of case
Time Observation Akça et al. [22 ] 3-unit bridge 34 24 months Success rate: 100% The bone level is stable Block et al. [26 ] 3-unit bridge 60 5 years Success rate: 90.6% abutment loss Rigid results are better than nonrigid There are no differences between bone loss around the implants Brägger et al. [18 ] Various 18 4-5 years Success rate: 97.5% (implant supported) Success rate: 95% tooth-implant supported prosthesis Clarke et al. [27 ] 3-unit bridge 1 32 months Success rate: 100% Ericsson et al. [35 ] Various 10 6–30 months Success rate: 100% Gunne et al. [23 ] 3-unit bridge 20 10 years Success rate: 85.1% (tooth-implant supported prosthesis) There is no difference between implant-implant and tooth-implant supported prosthesis Jemt et al. [21 ] Various 20 15 years Success rate: 98.7% Kindberg et al. [34 ] Various 41 14 weeks–9 years Success rate: 92.85% Lindh et al. [36 ] Various 123 more than 15 years Success rate: 98.4% (implant supported) Success rate: 94.9% (tooth-implant supported prosthesis) There are more technical problems at tooth-implant supported prosthesis